This is not a Chronicle article, but I wasn't sure if there was a more appropriate place to post. I looked at the various places and this seemed closest.
Anyway:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/10/24/anarchist.twitter.raid/index.htmlThis is the story of a man arrested, and many possessions seized, on the grounds that he caused riots.
I was struck in particular by this quote:
The published book seems sympathetic to the tactic of confronting police and destroying property of companies considered harmful, usually -- though not always -- multinational companies. Writing such a book is not a crime, though, and many of the other books cited by the police as evidence justifying the search after the fact can be bought on Amazon.com.
If that isn't worrisome enough, consider this:
Some of the other evidence the feds seized that shows he promotes riots? Steampunk magazine, for one. Buffy the Vampire Slayer DVDs.
Now, this article was written from a painfully biased viewpoint, and I wonder if any forumites have any information that might make the government's position here seem more reasoned and rational? Do I need to be afraid that I have a copy of Buffy the Vampire Slayer DVDs and
The Communist Manifesto (I think I still have that; it was an assigned text for a political science class many, many years ago) and therefore a raid on my apartment could be justified?