• Tuesday, May 29, 2012
May 29, 2012, 05:52:57 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with your Chronicle username and password
News: Talk about how to cope with chronic illness, disability, and other health issues in the academic workplace.
 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Changing social circles?  (Read 4360 times)
promovenda
Just thrilled to be a
Senior member
****
Posts: 943

Lost in the library


« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2009, 03:11:36 AM »

C. S. Lewis mentions this phenomenon in his book The Four Loves, in the chapter on Affection.
Logged

"You're a wonderful bartender, Promovenda.  The hamster bestows one of his special nibbles on your ear."
nikolite
The boss of me, but still just a
Junior member
**
Posts: 94


« Reply #16 on: May 30, 2009, 04:28:56 PM »

Also, grad students are really boring to people who are not interested in the same ideas.  My husband cannot stand going to grad student parties; it's not because he feels threatened by how great and super-intellectual we are or that he can't keep up, it's just that departmental gossip and a bunch of talk about Kant don't float his boat. 

I agree with Marigolds, I think in many cases people are just bored by certain intellectual and philosophical conversations in general.  Even during my senior year of college and while applying to grad school, I slowly began to lose certain friends who just didn't care about politics the way I did, or the psychological/emotional forces that influence voting, etc. etc.  So everyday conversations (with family and friends) began to come to a halt just because I started watching Jim Lehrer, McLaughlin Group and the like, and found social critique more interesting than whose album is coming out.  Not that I couldn't talk about Keisha Cole's new album, but after a while it gets boring and hard to "fake it" anymore, so to speak.  I'd also feel a little bummed that I was there for someone, but they weren't really there for me when I needed an ear.  I have one particular friend who I adore, but I know it won't work because our interests have changed so very much.  I don't think she feels inferior or anything, she just finds me boring sometimes, and I honestly feel the same about her, although she's terribly sweet and we still go out every now and then (in moderate doses).

But I've also had the problem of a friend thinking that I thought I was better than her, and becoming cold towards me once she found out I was applying to grad school and not planning on getting a job after graduation.  While I never talked about applying to grad school, didn't tell her what schools I got in (until I chose one and I just mentioned it to her once before she promptly changed the subject) she still found it necessary to tell everyone at a party that she had gotten accepted into the same school, after they begged her for months about attending, but rejected them because the classes looked too boring.  Mind you, I'm omitting countless facts that assures this story was a complete fabrication, and it really disheartened me that she felt she had to do that.  This was announced (of course) after the conversation came up that I was going to start a Ph.D and I guess I'd gotten too many congrats.  We don't really talk anymore, but there is absolutely nothing I can do besides being there for her when she feels like talking again.  But I know she won't be there for me and I'm not sure if that's even worth it. 

Then again, there are friends who have completely different worlds from me, but we still enjoy each other's company and I can talk to them about my fears of grad school without being judged or asked stupid questions about my reasons.  And I look forward to making new friends during grad school, on the inside and outside of academia, who will hopefully grow in the same direction that I am.  Every change we make will probably lead to newer and broader networks of friends, and that's not a bad thing.  D*mn, I wrote too much.
Logged

"He who restrains his desire does so because his desire is weak enough to be restrained."
oseph
Embracing the crazy
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 4,266


« Reply #17 on: May 30, 2009, 05:05:48 PM »

Oh, and of course I forgot the most important part - after the first year or so, I got really bored talking about my field or theorists all of the time, and I also got bored with the constant edginess and pseudo-witty quips and eternal analysis and deconstruction of everything under the sun.  Not that I don't like what we might call more intellectual conversations, but I found over time that perhaps 20% of the conversations I had with peers were genuine intellectual exchanges and the rest was a mixture of insecure showing off, intellectual wanking, fact recitations, and theory-babble that scrambled my brains.  So I got a bit more variety in my conversations and found myself once again able to talk about normal people stuff.
Logged

Oseph....you are right and you make sense.

For your future comments, I insult very directly.
thundering_m
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 1,896


« Reply #18 on: May 30, 2009, 05:20:42 PM »

Hear! Hear!
Oh, and of course I forgot the most important part - after the first year or so, I got really bored talking about my field or theorists all of the time, and I also got bored with the constant edginess and pseudo-witty quips and eternal analysis and deconstruction of everything under the sun.  Not that I don't like what we might call more intellectual conversations, but I found over time that perhaps 20% of the conversations I had with peers were genuine intellectual exchanges and the rest was a mixture of insecure showing off, intellectual wanking, fact recitations, and theory-babble that scrambled my brains.  So I got a bit more variety in my conversations and found myself once again able to talk about normal people stuff.
Logged

-TM
Thundering Marshmallow
marigolds
looks far too young to be a
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 7,355

i had fun once and it was awful


« Reply #19 on: May 30, 2009, 05:25:27 PM »

Oh, and of course I forgot the most important part - after the first year or so, I got really bored talking about my field or theorists all of the time, and I also got bored with the constant edginess and pseudo-witty quips and eternal analysis and deconstruction of everything under the sun.  Not that I don't like what we might call more intellectual conversations, but I found over time that perhaps 20% of the conversations I had with peers were genuine intellectual exchanges and the rest was a mixture of insecure showing off, intellectual wanking, fact recitations, and theory-babble that scrambled my brains.  So I got a bit more variety in my conversations and found myself once again able to talk about normal people stuff.

This is completely true.  My husband is a bit once-burned-twice-shy and still won't go to parties because he might get bored, but my cohort talks about TV shows way more than anything to do with work now.  (We still spend a lot of time on department gossip, though.) 
Logged

"You and your mom are hillbillies. This is a house of learned doctors."
commcycle
Senior member
****
Posts: 349


« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2009, 12:50:27 AM »

This is completely true.  My husband is a bit once-burned-twice-shy and still won't go to parties because he might get bored, but my cohort talks about TV shows way more than anything to do with work now.  (We still spend a lot of time on department gossip, though.) 

PhD Comics to the rescue:
http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1038
Logged
sugaree
shakin' it since 2007 and only a
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 3,486


« Reply #21 on: June 01, 2009, 02:34:15 PM »

Oh, and of course I forgot the most important part - after the first year or so, I got really bored talking about my field or theorists all of the time, and I also got bored with the constant edginess and pseudo-witty quips and eternal analysis and deconstruction of everything under the sun.  Not that I don't like what we might call more intellectual conversations, but I found over time that perhaps 20% of the conversations I had with peers were genuine intellectual exchanges and the rest was a mixture of insecure showing off, intellectual wanking, fact recitations, and theory-babble that scrambled my brains.  So I got a bit more variety in my conversations and found myself once again able to talk about normal people stuff.

This is completely true.  My husband is a bit once-burned-twice-shy and still won't go to parties because he might get bored, but my cohort talks about TV shows way more than anything to do with work now.  (We still spend a lot of time on department gossip, though.) 

Oh god, so true! When I first started grad school, I bonded quickly with a few of my cohort (who are still very close friends today). We giggled and gossiped and talked about television way too much, inspiring another grad - who was all of one year ahead of us in the program and oh-so-much-more-experienced - to comment that we didn't take things seriously enough and thus would never make it (like presumably he would, with his set-the-world-on-fire research). Today, all of us have completed doctoral degrees and TT jobs. Him? Never finished.

And no, I'm not gloating at all, why do you ask?
Logged

where's the bourbon?
smallways
Senior member
****
Posts: 268


« Reply #22 on: June 01, 2009, 06:56:38 PM »

I used to feel bad about taking my decidedly non-academic husband to grad student gatherings. Then I went to a few of his work gatherings, and realized that everyone talks shop--grad students just do it in larger words. I find that if I keep my comments about grad school light and funny (crap student essays and colourful personalities instead of methodology and the state of academe) people are pretty happy to hear about what I'm up to.

I would also like to fourth what Oseph said.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!