|
elsie
|
 |
« Reply #195 on: February 02, 2012, 09:37:37 PM » |
|
I do like a little bit of style. I prefer something more like a large purse to a messenger bag.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"People assume that time is a strict progression from cause to effect. But actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff." - the Doctor
|
|
|
galactic_hedgehog
Procrastinating, Python-quoting, Blue Blazer-drinking, chocolate-chip cookie-eating, Pastafarian, Not So
Distinguished Senior Member
Posts: 17,915
Mind Ninja
|
|
« Reply #196 on: February 02, 2012, 09:45:23 PM » |
|
Morning dress (although Ascot actually banned from the Royal Enclosure this week), in the hunting field, or with a velvet smoking jacket or dressing gown only.
Otherwise, never, ever, ever, unless you're a complete cad and a bounder.
I've found my style! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A pun is primâ facie an insult to the person you are talking with. It implies utter indifference to or sublime contempt for his remarks, no matter how serious." -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. Hedgie loves to read. |
|
|
|
elsie
|
|
« Reply #197 on: February 04, 2012, 09:55:05 AM » |
|
I'm thinking about this bag ( http://www.tumi.com/product/index.jsp?productId=12296687&prodFindSrc=paramNav) which is kind of on the line between purse and messenger bag. Does anyone know anything about Tumi? The reviews I've seen indicate that it can hold an iPad pretty easily. I like that it comes in blue (bright pink or orange are right out). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"People assume that time is a strict progression from cause to effect. But actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff." - the Doctor
|
|
|
|
compdoc
|
|
« Reply #198 on: February 18, 2012, 05:26:23 PM » |
|
elsie,
I don't know a think about Tumi, but I love that bag!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
systeme_d_
|
|
« Reply #199 on: February 18, 2012, 05:49:38 PM » |
|
I like it too, Elsie. Particularly in "smoky quartz." The fact that it is lightweight makes it even more practical.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Systeme_D is right. <rah rah RESEARCH!> |
|
|
melba_frilkins
Doing laundry.
Member-Moderator
Distinguished Senior Member
Posts: 6,165
Ok, I'll tell you a little secret if I don't run o
|
|
« Reply #200 on: February 18, 2012, 06:43:32 PM » |
|
Speaking of accessories...
What's happened to necklaces? Looking at dresses worn at the Grammys (and other recent red carpet events), hardly any of the women are wearing necklaces. So many of those plunging necklines and strapless gowns just scream for a gorgeous necklace, but hardly anyone wears one. They look naked to me. Am I just old fashioned?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Nothing to see here. Move along, folks.
|
|
|
|
merce
|
|
« Reply #201 on: February 18, 2012, 07:27:56 PM » |
|
Naked is right! I have noticed the same missing necklaces and wondered if the idea was not to give more of a sense of nakedness. For my part, I'm thinking I'd like to experiment with a very thin silver chain with a http://www.etsy.com/listing/85775260/french-silver-antique-religious-medal-st?ref=sr_gallery_9&sref=&ga_includes- =tags&ga_search_query=st+saint+therese&ga_page=3&ga_search_type=all&ga_facet= disc, perhaps a relic medal worn, so the medal falls right in the dip between the collar bones.
I don't think this look would go with a deep plunge of a neckline. Just thought I'd share my fantasy here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Who looks for God in the Bible? That's pretty dumb.
|
|
|
marigolds
looks far too young to be a
Distinguished Senior Member
Posts: 6,293
if it ain't ruff it ain't me
|
|
« Reply #202 on: February 18, 2012, 07:31:59 PM » |
|
Speaking of accessories...
What's happened to necklaces? Looking at dresses worn at the Grammys (and other recent red carpet events), hardly any of the women are wearing necklaces. So many of those plunging necklines and strapless gowns just scream for a gorgeous necklace, but hardly anyone wears one. They look naked to me. Am I just old fashioned?
I wear huge chunky vintage necklaces (usually two- or three-strand, slightly longer than choker-length, in one color family and non-symmetrical stones. They're often Bakelite or something similar--like this or this) ALL THE TIME. I have ones that match nearly every color of outfit I'm likely to wear--I love them more, even, than all my vintage scarves from the early 60s. They dress up an outfit effortlessly! Those actresses are fools. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You and your mom are hillbillies. This is a house of learned doctors."
|
|
|
|
systeme_d_
|
|
« Reply #203 on: February 18, 2012, 07:36:38 PM » |
|
Speaking of accessories...
What's happened to necklaces? Looking at dresses worn at the Grammys (and other recent red carpet events), hardly any of the women are wearing necklaces. So many of those plunging necklines and strapless gowns just scream for a gorgeous necklace, but hardly anyone wears one. They look naked to me. Am I just old fashioned?
I wear huge chunky vintage necklaces (usually two- or three-strand, slightly longer than choker-length, in one color family and non-symmetrical stones. They're often Bakelite or something similar--like this or this) ALL THE TIME. I have ones that match nearly every color of outfit I'm likely to wear--I love them more, even, than all my vintage scarves from the early 60s. They dress up an outfit effortlessly! Those actresses are fools. Marigolds, I have been looking at this necklace for a few days, and although I won't buy it because I think it is overpriced, I love it. Your post brought it immediately to mind! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Systeme_D is right. <rah rah RESEARCH!> |
|
|
marigolds
looks far too young to be a
Distinguished Senior Member
Posts: 6,293
if it ain't ruff it ain't me
|
|
« Reply #204 on: February 18, 2012, 07:48:10 PM » |
|
Speaking of accessories...
What's happened to necklaces? Looking at dresses worn at the Grammys (and other recent red carpet events), hardly any of the women are wearing necklaces. So many of those plunging necklines and strapless gowns just scream for a gorgeous necklace, but hardly anyone wears one. They look naked to me. Am I just old fashioned?
I wear huge chunky vintage necklaces (usually two- or three-strand, slightly longer than choker-length, in one color family and non-symmetrical stones. They're often Bakelite or something similar--like this or this) ALL THE TIME. I have ones that match nearly every color of outfit I'm likely to wear--I love them more, even, than all my vintage scarves from the early 60s. They dress up an outfit effortlessly! Those actresses are fools. Marigolds, I have been looking at this necklace for a few days, and although I won't buy it because I think it is overpriced, I love it. Your post brought it immediately to mind! Oooh, gorgeous! I'd totally wear that with a khaki pencil skirt, a plain jane brown cardigan, and a plain white v-neck knit top. IT would completely make the outfit! That looks a lot like several of mine, but mine are probably less fancy in origin. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You and your mom are hillbillies. This is a house of learned doctors."
|
|
|
|
compdoc
|
|
« Reply #205 on: Yesterday at 08:31:26 PM » |
|
I just purchased a Beijo purse off ebay. I hope that I like it as much as my last one.
I went clothes' shopping yesterday and did not buy a single accessory, but I have lots that I don't wear enough already. Need to get busy getting my look together.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
systeme_d_
|
|
« Reply #206 on: Yesterday at 08:45:14 PM » |
|
Compdoc, I was thinking just yesterday that I needed another Beijo purse. A brown one. My only other brown Beijo is a briefcase. All my other Beijos are black and platinum and charcoal.
Which one did you get, Compdoc?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Systeme_D is right. <rah rah RESEARCH!> |
|
|
|
compdoc
|
|
« Reply #207 on: Yesterday at 10:42:53 PM » |
|
You know, I don't know the name of it. It's a metallic teal. I have a bubble gum.
Did not win the Pink Promise, which I wasn't sure I wanted to win anyway, since my mother did not survive her breast cancer fight.
I'm still trying to decide if I want to bid on another. Why? I don't know. Because it is cute.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
