|
pgher
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2009, 01:15:02 PM » |
|
I had it happen to me for last spring semester, which was my first semester at this institution. Here, evaluations must be collected by non-students and non-instructors, so I enlisted a secretary. When I heard that the evaluations were missing, I was first angry at the secretary, then angry at the system. I had a long conversation with the chair of the relevant committee, and we agreed that there were significant flaws in the way the forms are handled. I went through the various stages of grief, ending with "acceptance."
Subsequently, we discovered that approximately 80% of our department also had missing evaluations. Our dept. chair investigated, and found almost all of them in storage. Apparently there was some problem in the way the machines were coded or something. In the end, I got my evaluations.
I guess there are a few lessons: 1. Don't be too quick to lay blame. There is a fairly long chain of events that has to happen to get evaluations from the individual students to the instructor. 2. Student evaluation processes should be periodically reviewed and revised to minimize opportunities for errors. This is particularly important in the present age of accountability. 3. Be careful who you trust. 4. Get other feedback. Peer evaluations, informal student evaluations, etc. These are only moderately useful (at best) for P&T, but are certainly useful for other purposes.
On the issue of online evals: This incident put me in the "anti" camp. Suppose this administrative error had occurred with an online system. With no paper trail, the information would be absolutely gone. With paper evals, they can be re-scanned (at least in principle, and this time in practice).
|