I am tempted to put the 'Worth' mug into the mailbox of one of my colleagues who appears to be determined to monopolize meetings and tell me how to do my job (I now have to chair some meetings). This would not be so bad were it not for the fact that his interventions on procedure and his 'helpful' comment frequently make him look like an idiot, but he is completely oblivious to the fact. I certainly need to find some way of keeping him under control as I would like the meetings to be a focussed forum for multiple opinions, and short, and so would most (all? - maybe not his closest ally) of the other attendees.
Videotape. Seriously. "So no one has to take notes, and so we can provide a more complete transcript for the people who couldn't be here today, we're simply going to videotape. Then we'll take turns reviewing it and writing down minutes to be sure we all recall the same decisions."
.
Then approach said bombast with this logic: " You contribute so much and have obviously thought about each and every item on the agenda to a great extent. Would you mind being the first reviewer?"
Then see what the guy comes up with (e.g. some reflection), but no matter what: "Now that you've seen how we interact as a group, do you have some ideas for getting everyone engaged in the process? The cohesive, cooperative relationships are actually more important than the particular projects at this point in our development as a functioning committee."
Bossy guy may be so focused on the task he feels like a conduit for ideas, not a person in a relationship; he is also not focused on the future and the idea of building bridges and paths for future tasks. But you knew that. This strategy might make it self-evident to him, with some guidance.