• Sunday, February 19, 2012
February 19, 2012, 01:48:53 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with your Chronicle username and password
News: For all you tweeters, follow The Chronicle on Twitter.
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 17
  Print  
Author Topic: Capella and Walden Universities  (Read 62760 times)
gourmand601
Member
***
Posts: 165


« Reply #90 on: July 16, 2008, 08:29:53 PM »

Quote from: truescholar601
Well there definitely is nothing wrong with having more than one master's degree. I would try to work out a deal with my advisor and provost...etc. and see if i could double dip and work on another master's in the same area. It's quite doable.

Best of luck to you.

Yes but at this institution a master's means two more years on top of the PhD. It is through credit hours only. I will also have to do a thesis. I really want to get out and get a job and start making money instead of living like...well...a college student.  I guess going to Capella or Walden online while I worked would defeat the purpose.....

I think it's doubtful that you need another masters. You were accepted to a good PhD program. All you have to do is finish it and keep going strong.

If you do not want to include your for-profit masters on your CV... you can always do one at another school... and for cheap too.

You can do it after you finish your doctorate.... but that's only if you still do not want to use your current master's degree.
Logged

"It all follows the same old rule, the best engineers were technicians
first, the best doctors were medics first, the best Ph.D.'s were
practitioners first."
nomad
Member
***
Posts: 108


« Reply #91 on: July 16, 2008, 08:52:12 PM »

Quote from: truescholar601


If you do not want to include your for-profit masters on your CV... you can always do one at another school... and for cheap too.

You can do it after you finish your doctorate.... but that's only if you still do not want to use your current master's degree.

Yes but it would be a little odd to list my masters as coming after my PhD on my CV. I like what octoprof said. If I am going to research PFP Universities having that on my CV could be a help rather then a hindrance. Of course this depends on what the results of my research turn out to be.....
Logged
gourmand601
Member
***
Posts: 165


« Reply #92 on: July 16, 2008, 10:35:07 PM »

Quote from: truescholar601


If you do not want to include your for-profit masters on your CV... you can always do one at another school... and for cheap too.

You can do it after you finish your doctorate.... but that's only if you still do not want to use your current master's degree.

Yes but it would be a little odd to list my masters as coming after my PhD on my CV. I like what octoprof said. If I am going to research PFP Universities having that on my CV could be a help rather then a hindrance. Of course this depends on what the results of my research turn out to be.....

Okay.

I have colleagues who have doctorates in say education but get a master's in public health or business..... it will not seem odd to get another masters after you get your doctorate.

But that is your decision.

Best of luck to you.
Logged

"It all follows the same old rule, the best engineers were technicians
first, the best doctors were medics first, the best Ph.D.'s were
practitioners first."
aandsdean
I feel affirmed that I'm truly a 6,000+ post
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 6,411

Positively impactful on stakeholder synergies


« Reply #93 on: July 17, 2008, 06:47:06 AM »

Quote from: truescholar601


If you do not want to include your for-profit masters on your CV... you can always do one at another school... and for cheap too.

You can do it after you finish your doctorate.... but that's only if you still do not want to use your current master's degree.

Yes but it would be a little odd to list my masters as coming after my PhD on my CV. I like what octoprof said. If I am going to research PFP Universities having that on my CV could be a help rather then a hindrance. Of course this depends on what the results of my research turn out to be.....

Okay.

I have colleagues who have doctorates in say education but get a master's in public health or business..... it will not seem odd to get another masters after you get your doctorate.

But that is your decision.

Best of luck to you.

It would seem odd if it were in the same or a closely related field (which an MPA or MBA are not, relative to education).
Logged

Wearing a black armband for Lucy
gourmand601
Member
***
Posts: 165


« Reply #94 on: July 17, 2008, 07:18:54 AM »

Quote from: truescholar601


If you do not want to include your for-profit masters on your CV... you can always do one at another school... and for cheap too.

You can do it after you finish your doctorate.... but that's only if you still do not want to use your current master's degree.

Yes but it would be a little odd to list my masters as coming after my PhD on my CV. I like what octoprof said. If I am going to research PFP Universities having that on my CV could be a help rather then a hindrance. Of course this depends on what the results of my research turn out to be.....

Okay.

I have colleagues who have doctorates in say education but get a master's in public health or business..... it will not seem odd to get another masters after you get your doctorate.

But that is your decision.

Best of luck to you.

It would seem odd if it were in the same or a closely related field (which an MPA or MBA are not, relative to education).

Well that was the point that I was trying to make since Nomad did not want to double-dip during her doctoral program. I have found it to be quite usual for doctorate holders to go back and get a master's in another area. This would make them academically qualified to teach another subject.... especially one outside of their primary area.
Logged

"It all follows the same old rule, the best engineers were technicians
first, the best doctors were medics first, the best Ph.D.'s were
practitioners first."
untenured
On far too many committees
Member-Moderator
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 5,540


« Reply #95 on: July 17, 2008, 08:07:24 AM »

I wouldn't worry so much about the order of the graduate degrees either.  Just in case, I'd have an answer prepared in case the question comes up.

Whatever happened to OP?  It's been a few days.

Untenured
Logged

Quote from: kedves link=topic=56697.msg1152543#msg1152543
You are among the Pure and Truthful, however small their Number.
My goodness, that was an exceptionally good analysis of the forum.
jonesey
All-Purpose Savage, Barroom Sociologist, and
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 6,035


« Reply #96 on: July 17, 2008, 08:46:26 AM »

I don't think True works for Walden.  I do think that he/she is defending the school because he/she's defending his/her PhD. 

You don't see folks jumping up and down defending Yale.  True doth protest too much, it seems. 

True, if you're happy with your PhD (and, obviously, you are) then be happy.  All this hyperbole isn't making you, or Walden, look good. 
Logged

Jonesey, I know you're a being of sensitivity and refinement.
gourmand601
Member
***
Posts: 165


« Reply #97 on: July 17, 2008, 09:09:41 AM »

I don't think True works for Walden.  I do think that he/she is defending the school because he/she's defending his/her PhD. 

You don't see folks jumping up and down defending Yale.  True doth protest too much, it seems. 

True, if you're happy with your PhD (and, obviously, you are) then be happy.  All this hyperbole isn't making you, or Walden, look good. 

I have not defended anything. Someone posed a question about two institutions and I provided factual information about one of them to the best of my knowledge. This information was intended to give them, and perhaps anyone else who may have been interested.... a slate of information that would allow them to make an informed decision as whether or not to attend a program THEY HAD ALREADY APPLIED TO.

I also provided factual information about other programs as well. I preferred to give this information instead of lending a baseless opinion.

I have not presented my CV to anyone on this board.. because it really does not matter what anyone here thinks.  Several of you have contacted me in private which lets me know that what I've posted has been well received. I appreciate your genuine inquiry and support.

Best

TS601
Logged

"It all follows the same old rule, the best engineers were technicians
first, the best doctors were medics first, the best Ph.D.'s were
practitioners first."
nomad
Member
***
Posts: 108


« Reply #98 on: July 17, 2008, 02:21:31 PM »

OK. I only just joined in this post yesterday so I am not trying to stir things up but there has been a lot of discussion about looking up the facts and doing the research. I have actually done quite a bit of the research and am in the process of doing more.  If anyone has anything interesting that I am forgetting I welcome comments. Like I said I am in the process of collecting this info.



The issue is not online education (I work for a university that has a large, successful, and good online program), but the for-profit nature of Walden and Capella.  They are corporations for the benefit of stockholders, and nothing can change that short of their conversion to 501(c)3 status, which we'll see long after even the 32-year-olds among us are dead.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Capella is publicly traded. Walden is not and is a member of an international network of universities with over 270,000 students worldwide  and
25 institutions with 58 campuses in 16 countries. The President and Provost have all final say regarding the academics of the institution.


TrueScholar is correct. Walden is not publicly traded. There are only 12 publicly traded organizations and many of these companies are parents to several separate universities and colleges. The ones that come to mind are ITT Tech, DeVry (including Keller), Phoenix (including Apollo),  Strayer, Career Education Corp, Corinthian etc

Waldon, however, still IS a for profit (FP) organization. As you can see from above the majority of private for profits are NOT publicly traded. This does not separate Walden from the pack. It simply is not shareholder run.

The issue is not the distance. It is the profit as mentioned above. According to Kinser (2006), the simultaneous growth of distance learning and FPs is purely coincidental. There are very few distance learning FPs.  The majority of distance institutions are not FP. The majority of FPs are not distance. This means that a person who is interested in distance learning can easily find an organization that is not a FP.

I have found that FP offer a specific type of education. This is why I ended up with FP. They offer hands on instruction by professional currently working in or retired from a specific field. For me it was computer info systems. They had the labs that I needed and offered profs who worked in the very fields that I was interested in and in the very city in which I lived. This gave me networking opportunities as well as education. For this reason you will not find many programs in humanities or hard sciences. This is why you find education, info systems, and psychology.

Many non-profit institutions are switching to for profit or are being bought out by for profit organizations because they simply cannot make it in this economy. With a growing number of nontraditional students, many smaller institutions cannot afford the necessary infrastructure to pull these students in. Academia is a business and institutions need financial support or they won't last. Just as much, many nonprofits adopt a for profit model of management and operation.

I have found only one university that has made the switch, National. I know that there have been buyouts such as South (or Southern - sorry I don't have that specific info directly in front of me). I did find evidence of non profits creating a for profit aspect of their program such as eCorrnell. Obviously, Cornell did not make the switch. They added income to an already existing organization. This is not the same thing. If I am incorrect and there are traditional universities that are making the switch I would like to have this info. I have done the research. I can find only one.

Accreditation -
Accreditation was mentioned. The majority of FPs are NOT accredited equally to NFPs. The majority (over 3500) have national accreditation which is different then the regional accreditation that most traditional colleges and universities have. This is why credits are often non transferable. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. Many students do not know that their credits will NOT transfer if they leave a FP and decided to go to a traditional school.  While this is a problem with most FPs I also know from discussion with colleagues that many FPs which are regionally accredited, give credits that will not transfer. Phoenix comes to mind. Some will transfer and some will not. I know that DeVry is working out something with the local community colleges in one location to accept transfers. (Although I cannot remember which state or city this is in.) Devry, however is regionally accredited.

Regional accreditation is also not equal. Nobody seems to know how many FPs have regional accreditation but there are estimates that range from 64 to 10% of FPs. Unfortunately, the database that contains this info, IPEDS, spits out different numbers depending on how the question is asked. It remains a mystery.

Interesting to note is that North Central is the agency that accredits all 6 virtual only universities. Only North Central, no other. (If I am incorrect please tell me. This is what my research has found.) North Central also accredits 5 of the 7 FP doctoral Universities. Interesting?

What is more interesting is that I have found no journal articles that have discussed recruiting methods although there is a general feeling that recruiting is unethical. There have been newspaper articles and TV reports, but no studies. So the jury is still out on recruitment.

So since there is a lot of argument and a lot of "look it up yourself", in this post I thought I would throw out some facts. This is my area of interest. For some more reading:

http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0787985287.html
I have found an online version of this report but for the life of me I cannot remember where it is.


Nomad
« Last Edit: July 17, 2008, 02:28:51 PM by nomad » Logged
gourmand601
Member
***
Posts: 165


« Reply #99 on: July 17, 2008, 03:44:15 PM »

OK. I only just joined in this post yesterday so I am not trying to stir things up but there has been a lot of discussion about looking up the facts and doing the research. I have actually done quite a bit of the research and am in the process of doing more.  If anyone has anything interesting that I am forgetting I welcome comments. Like I said I am in the process of collecting this info.



The issue is not online education (I work for a university that has a large, successful, and good online program), but the for-profit nature of Walden and Capella.  They are corporations for the benefit of stockholders, and nothing can change that short of their conversion to 501(c)3 status, which we'll see long after even the 32-year-olds among us are dead.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Capella is publicly traded. Walden is not and is a member of an international network of universities with over 270,000 students worldwide  and
25 institutions with 58 campuses in 16 countries. The President and Provost have all final say regarding the academics of the institution.


TrueScholar is correct. Walden is not publicly traded. There are only 12 publicly traded organizations and many of these companies are parents to several separate universities and colleges. The ones that come to mind are ITT Tech, DeVry (including Keller), Phoenix (including Apollo),  Strayer, Career Education Corp, Corinthian etc

Waldon, however, still IS a for profit (FP) organization. As you can see from above the majority of private for profits are NOT publicly traded. This does not separate Walden from the pack. It simply is not shareholder run.

The issue is not the distance. It is the profit as mentioned above. According to Kinser (2006), the simultaneous growth of distance learning and FPs is purely coincidental. There are very few distance learning FPs.  The majority of distance institutions are not FP. The majority of FPs are not distance. This means that a person who is interested in distance learning can easily find an organization that is not a FP.

I have found that FP offer a specific type of education. This is why I ended up with FP. They offer hands on instruction by professional currently working in or retired from a specific field. For me it was computer info systems. They had the labs that I needed and offered profs who worked in the very fields that I was interested in and in the very city in which I lived. This gave me networking opportunities as well as education. For this reason you will not find many programs in humanities or hard sciences. This is why you find education, info systems, and psychology.

Many non-profit institutions are switching to for profit or are being bought out by for profit organizations because they simply cannot make it in this economy. With a growing number of nontraditional students, many smaller institutions cannot afford the necessary infrastructure to pull these students in. Academia is a business and institutions need financial support or they won't last. Just as much, many nonprofits adopt a for profit model of management and operation.

I have found only one university that has made the switch, National. I know that there have been buyouts such as South (or Southern - sorry I don't have that specific info directly in front of me). I did find evidence of non profits creating a for profit aspect of their program such as eCorrnell. Obviously, Cornell did not make the switch. They added income to an already existing organization. This is not the same thing. If I am incorrect and there are traditional universities that are making the switch I would like to have this info. I have done the research. I can find only one.

Accreditation -
Accreditation was mentioned. The majority of FPs are NOT accredited equally to NFPs. The majority (over 3500) have national accreditation which is different then the regional accreditation that most traditional colleges and universities have. This is why credits are often non transferable. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. Many students do not know that their credits will NOT transfer if they leave a FP and decided to go to a traditional school.  While this is a problem with most FPs I also know from discussion with colleagues that many FPs which are regionally accredited, give credits that will not transfer. Phoenix comes to mind. Some will transfer and some will not. I know that DeVry is working out something with the local community colleges in one location to accept transfers. (Although I cannot remember which state or city this is in.) Devry, however is regionally accredited.

Regional accreditation is also not equal. Nobody seems to know how many FPs have regional accreditation but there are estimates that range from 64 to 10% of FPs. Unfortunately, the database that contains this info, IPEDS, spits out different numbers depending on how the question is asked. It remains a mystery.

Interesting to note is that North Central is the agency that accredits all 6 virtual only universities. Only North Central, no other. (If I am incorrect please tell me. This is what my research has found.) North Central also accredits 5 of the 7 FP doctoral Universities. Interesting?

What is more interesting is that I have found no journal articles that have discussed recruiting methods although there is a general feeling that recruiting is unethical. There have been newspaper articles and TV reports, but no studies. So the jury is still out on recruitment.

So since there is a lot of argument and a lot of "look it up yourself", in this post I thought I would throw out some facts. This is my area of interest. For some more reading:

http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0787985287.html
I have found an online version of this report but for the life of me I cannot remember where it is.


Nomad

Nomad, I think you have done an excellent job in presenting your argument. Just be careful in saying that something I said may be true..... it tends to open the flood gates. lol

I think you have here the beginnings of perhaps a strong literature review.

All of the below are copy/pasted from The Chronicle

John F. Kennedy recently merged with National because of its inability to "compete with Apollo's University of Phoenix.

Laureate Education, who owns Walden University, announced yesterday that it has acquired NewSchool of Architecture and Design, based in San Diego, California, and has finalized its acquisition of Kendall College, based in Chicago, Illinois. These institutions strategically complement the Laureate International Universities Network. They also are the Network’s first U.S. campus-based institutions.

NewSchool of Architecture and Design, founded in 1980, is fully accredited by the National Architecture Accrediting Board and the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools. The school, with more than 440 students, offers both a Bachelors and a Masters degree in architecture.

Kendall College, with approximately 1,500 students, is one of the leading culinary and hospitality institutions in the U.S. Founded in 1934, Kendall also offers degrees in business and early childhood education. Kendall is accredited by The Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, and the associates degrees within its culinary school are accredited by the American Culinary Federation. Laureate announced a broad partnership with Kendall in 2004. Laureate provided financial assistance to support construction of Kendall’s new state-of-the-art campus in downtown Chicago and received an option to acquire the institution.

University of Northern Virginia, for profit, has been in talks to acquire Myers College.

Apollo Group recently purchased a few universities in Chile

Laureate Education, a private firm that owns Walden University, is in talks with a struggling college in New Mexico that could give the international company a second campus location in the United States and turn the College of Santa Fe into the latest private college to seek a deal with a for-profit higher-education company in hopes of resolving its financial troubles.

Western Governors University, an online institution has a nonprofit status but operates under a for-profit model like Franklin University. Western Governors University is regionally accredited by the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities, one of the major accrediting commissions recognized by the U.S. Department of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. The Northwest Commission is also responsible for the accreditation of other major institutions such as the University of Washington, University of Oregon, Gonzaga University, University of Utah, University of Idaho, and BYU, to name just a few. Although regional accreditation is considered the highest form of accreditation, WGU is also nationally accredited by the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC).  
 
WGU has the distinction of being the only university to receive regional accreditation from four regional accrediting commissions. In part because of its founding by the governors of 19 western states, which encompass a wide geographic region, WGU was simultaneously reviewed by a special committee — the Inter-Regional Accrediting Committee — comprised of representatives from four regional accrediting commissions. In February 2003, the committee awarded WGU accreditation in all four regions, an extraordinary recognition that had never before nor since occurred. The Northwest Commission is now considered WGU's "home" accrediting body because the university's headquarters are located in Utah, which falls under the review of the Northwest Commission. WGU still continues to be an institution with a broad focus and a mission to expand access to higher education.


Hope this helps with your research.

And thanks for being objective in your post.





Logged

"It all follows the same old rule, the best engineers were technicians
first, the best doctors were medics first, the best Ph.D.'s were
practitioners first."
nomad
Member
***
Posts: 108


« Reply #100 on: July 17, 2008, 04:04:02 PM »

Actually it is the other way around. I have the lit review in front of me on my desk.  I took my entire lit review and stuck it into one post.

This is pulled from your post

"Western Governors University, an online institution has a nonprofit status but operates under a for-profit model like Franklin University. "

What does for profit model mean in this quote? Is top down organizational governance which is management centered instead of faculty centered? Does it refer to finance?  Does it refer to student services? This is a pretty vague description.
Logged
gourmand601
Member
***
Posts: 165


« Reply #101 on: July 17, 2008, 04:25:43 PM »

Actually it is the other way around. I have the lit review in front of me on my desk.  I took my entire lit review and stuck it into one post.

This is pulled from your post

"Western Governors University, an online institution has a nonprofit status but operates under a for-profit model like Franklin University. "

What does for profit model mean in this quote? Is top down organizational governance which is management centered instead of faculty centered? Does it refer to finance?  Does it refer to student services? This is a pretty vague description.

I'm in a business discipline so it's very simple for me to understand.

For some, for-profit and not-for-profit, is a simple play of words. If you think about it, all institutions need money and are in the business to make it. If not, why does tuition keep going up every year? Making money comes with a huge bag of making enough to recruit qualified faculty, upkeep facilities....etc. But when you get in the business of for-profit and not-for-profit, you get into business structure and tax filings. Whereas not-for-profit, institutions must give away, or find a way to channel just as much as they take in, for-profit institutions, if they choose, can keep every single dime they make. In other words, for non-profits the bottom line must be zeroed...... which is why you find some departments well financed and some underfinanced.... which is why you see some deans taking international trips to conferences (to play), getting paid while on sobbatical,  and some deans feeding students who attend class during the day gourmet lunches. Plain and simple.... especially with state schools.... if there is any money left over..... the budget will be stripped.

With for-profit institutions, left over money is just that.... profit. Money is usually "invested" back into the university to make it grow, or placed in a bank account to draw interest. Bonuses are given as well as merit pay increases.... depending on student and performance reviews. In instances where institutions are publicly traded funds are allocated accordingly toward shareholder's wealth. One important note however, is that in order to get tax breaks.... they must also spend spend spend... which is why you see some institutions advertising on every street corner or pop-up ad.... it's a write-off.

Some for-profits, however, operate like non-profits. Even though profits are left over, much of this is given back in forms of research funding, fellowships, and scholarships to students. This way they can write it off as perhaps a loss or gift. With for-profit institutions, faculty and adminstrative salaries are generally higher and are paid based on demand..... per head. For instance, at Walden University, Ph.D. faculty get a base salary but are paid extra for each mentee he or she mentors for the dissertation. Of course this is because it involves a substantially larger amount of work. But there is a cap in the number that can be mentored by each faculty mentor.

I tried to give you a quick course. lol  But does any of this help?
Logged

"It all follows the same old rule, the best engineers were technicians
first, the best doctors were medics first, the best Ph.D.'s were
practitioners first."
gourmand601
Member
***
Posts: 165


« Reply #102 on: July 17, 2008, 04:29:18 PM »

Actually it is the other way around. I have the lit review in front of me on my desk.  I took my entire lit review and stuck it into one post.

This is pulled from your post

"Western Governors University, an online institution has a nonprofit status but operates under a for-profit model like Franklin University. "

What does for profit model mean in this quote? Is top down organizational governance which is management centered instead of faculty centered? Does it refer to finance?  Does it refer to student services? This is a pretty vague description.

With for-profit institutions, you can still have organizational governance and faculty governance. Actually... if you think about it... every institution has this. Sometimes the two sides do clash. I honestly see it as a checks and balance as long as the institution isn't publicly traded......

But the overall idea here is student centeredness.
Logged

"It all follows the same old rule, the best engineers were technicians
first, the best doctors were medics first, the best Ph.D.'s were
practitioners first."
untenured
On far too many committees
Member-Moderator
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 5,540


« Reply #103 on: July 17, 2008, 04:55:12 PM »

I think truescholar found a friend.

Aww.

Untenured
Logged

Quote from: kedves link=topic=56697.msg1152543#msg1152543
You are among the Pure and Truthful, however small their Number.
My goodness, that was an exceptionally good analysis of the forum.
nomad
Member
***
Posts: 108


« Reply #104 on: July 17, 2008, 05:02:16 PM »

Actually it is the other way around. I have the lit review in front of me on my desk.  I took my entire lit review and stuck it into one post.

This is pulled from your post

"Western Governors University, an online institution has a nonprofit status but operates under a for-profit model like Franklin University. "

What does for profit model mean in this quote? Is top down organizational governance which is management centered instead of faculty centered? Does it refer to finance?  Does it refer to student services? This is a pretty vague description.

With for-profit institutions, you can still have organizational governance and faculty governance. Actually... if you think about it... every institution has this. Sometimes the two sides do clash. I honestly see it as a checks and balance as long as the institution isn't publicly traded......

But the overall idea here is student centeredness.

Actually this is where the literature is somewhat strong. One of the main differences between FP and traditional NPs is the governance and decision making.  FP  typically have no faculty governance. Faculty are employees without tenure and they serve the administration. They do not have the protection of tenure. There are no steps for advancement. Faculty are not hired based on their education as much as their expertise. The education is a requirement of accreditation. The expertise, specifically in the field, is the requirement of the institution. This means that FP and traditionals have different models of decision making not related to finance.

One more area that makes the difference are courses. FP courses are typically NOT designed by faculty. They are designed by subjects experts and taught by faculty. In my experience faculty at traditional universities design their own courses. This is a major difference in teaching model and this is pretty significant in my experience. This means that any faculty can fill any spot as long as they have some knowledge of an area. This means that a student wont choose a school because a specific findividual is there.

Most students who are choosing between FP and traditional organizations do not know this the differences that I have discussed. The question is, when you speak of a non-profit with a FP model are you talking more then the bottom line. Who designs the courses? How are faculty treated and what is their place?

It is the place of the faculty that makes the choice between the FP or traditional significant. Not the finances. A student must understand when they choose a FP who they are learning from and what they are learning. For a masters in info systems it didn't matter for me. For a PhD where I will be doing original research under the guidance of a mentor it make a huge difference. If I plan to seek out an academic job after graduation, my mentor matters. If I want to do research as a grad student, I want someone whose name is known and who is currently publishing. In my opinion this specifically can be a problem for a student hoping to go into academia from a FP institution. It is not only about how the money is handled. It is about who is being hired to teach. I enjoyed teaching at the FP I worked at. But I taught from a syllabus that was designed by someone else and gave tests that were required by the organization. I instructed. This worked well for undergrads and my AA students. This is not a good thing for graduate students especially PhD level.

I wrote this rather quickly as I am just about to step out. Hopefully it made sense.

Nomad
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 17
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!