catarin:
I was reading online about members of the Israeli Knesset who are drawing the line on this 60 year struggle. They are contacting many governments, nonMuslim and Muslim, to see who would be agreeable to take in some Arab Palestinian Muslims. In a humanitarian effort, they want to move refugees to other countries so the Muslims can start new lives. But will anyone take them?
A. Hitler did exactly the same
humanitarian effort (I don't really know if I have to put these words in quotation marks for you, catarin) for Jews. Nobody wanted to take Jews.
There are so many hadiths that need to be taken out of Islam because they are self-serving and false.
The whole Old Testament is "self-serving". But, I wrote it many times, this is not a problem: despite the fact that Old Testament stands only for the rights of the Chosen People, Jews, and it treats others very badly, it was a religious belief that nobody has the right to prohibit to the Jews. The problem began when Jews took it as a guide to start war against others, forming the Cult of Chosen People. Nothing was wrong with German history and the legend of Sigfrid, until the moment the cult of Sigfrid was propagated and taken as a gide for making a war.
Not the Old Testament, Koran, or the legend of Sigfrid are "false". False are the applications. And, please note that using each of them in a
defensive war is a noble patriotic propaganda, but they become the guides to crime when used in an
aggressive war. If you ask what is the difference between the two kinds of war, it is determined by two criteria: 1. Who started the war or the occupation of the foreign country and 2. On whose territory the war is going on. Starting the "preventive war" has no justification, it's a BS, although starting preventive attacks in a war is quite permissible.
All this is well known; I write it only because we are being thrown into the state of savagery by the war mongers who are trying hard to abolish the law.