I am hoping that "in general" was not a blast towards me and my original post. I would hope that this site is more supportive than that...
This
is a supportive place, but it requires that its members develop a bit of a thick skin and understand that it's possible to take comments in ways other than intended by the sender. That might have been a dig at you; it might also have been a dig at your grad program, or grad programs in general, at the poor job of preparing graduates for life on the tenure track; it may also have just been a vent of steam, not directed at anyone in particular. Don't be so quick to be offended.
For example, it is easy to misinterpret this comment:
Thank you to all of those who responded. I wanted other conferences to ADD to my calendar other than the ones in my region and AERA.
Is that thank-you sarcastic, rather than earnest? Are you blasting people for not understanding your intentions in the first place? Probably not, and yet I wouldn't be surprised if some people took it that way.
Incidentally, it would have been useful if you had included this information in your first post, which gave no indication that you knew about AERA or regional conferences.
Now then. I think the best conference on teaching is the Lilly Conference that usually takes place in the fall. I've never been to a more useful or helpful conference. I am a humanist, and yet the best tips I got came from a physicist and a social scientist. You can find information at
http://www.units.muohio.edu/lillycon/.
Good luck.