|
lotsoquestions
|
 |
« on: May 05, 2008, 05:45:21 PM » |
|
I now have three different university gigs and I'm just wondering how you all decide which one to list when you present papers and publish research. Do you rotate them? Choose the most prestigious? Choose the one where research is ostensible valued? Thanks --
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
womanofproperty
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2008, 09:51:36 PM » |
|
When I was in this situation (affiliated with two institutions, though, not three) and presented research results at conferences, I'd use the institution whose IRB committee approved the research. That institution should get the "credit," so to speak, for supporting the research.
Am I right in thinking from your question that the work wasn't carried out in association with any of the institutions you're currently working at and that you're no longer affiliated with the institution where the work was done?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sciencephd
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2008, 10:08:01 PM » |
|
Choose the one which will benefit you most, whether wrt prestige, or perhaps if one of these places is where you expect to apply for a permanent position.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I just hate it that I constantly have to like everyone and everything. -- moonstone
O, what a hateful feminist concoction!
Jews, communists, "lesbians", feminists and marihuana addicts --Pyshnov
|
|
|
|
lotsoquestions
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2008, 08:26:27 AM » |
|
I'm a social science type, so no one at any university has provided me with any resources (beyond access to interlibrary loan). I'm still ostensibly affiliated with university number 1, where I was while I did the research. But the truly petty part of me doesn't want to give them any credit since it's the place where I feel most exploited. I like the idea of choosing the one that offers the most promotion potential.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mozman
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2008, 12:09:07 PM » |
|
Why not both? I have 2 different institutional affiliations and use both of them, denoted by footnotes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Could you grow the foot into another patient? I mean, you are a scientist.
|
|
|
wanderer
I Don't Re-
Senior member
Posts: 295
|
|
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2008, 01:59:18 PM » |
|
Have you considered combining the institutions into an attention-getting, creative affiliation?
I'm thinking of something like UNC Tampa, University of Michiana, or Central Harvard State... I bet if you shared your affiliations with us we could come up with something great.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
yellowtractor
|
|
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2008, 02:11:19 PM » |
|
Have you considered combining the institutions into an attention-getting, creative affiliation?
I'm thinking of something like UNC Tampa, University of Michiana, or Central Harvard State... I bet if you shared your affiliations with us we could come up with something great.
It's what I would do. The University of Central Harvard State, c'est moi. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
i think is good for every one only the think is that we will always scares about that. |
|
|
miss_m
I can't believe I'm a
Member
Posts: 132
"Sit your ass down and write."--larryc
|
|
« Reply #7 on: May 07, 2008, 05:29:21 PM » |
|
I tend to choose the one I feel more attached to or secure with, as I usually have one of those. Especially for pubs, as I don't want to go through proofs with one affliation listed only to have that not be the right uni when the thing comes out in print.
Otherwise, I choose the one that has money to reimburse conference expenses, as all the schools I have been with want evidence of presentation to give funds. I couldn't bring myself to highlight my little name and another school's name when this institution is footing the bill.
MM
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"In academia, there's always someone who is brighter, more charismatic, more connected, more insightful, and more well-paid than you."
--Untenured
|
|
|
|
