• Tuesday, May 29, 2012
May 29, 2012, 01:49:14 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with your Chronicle username and password
News: Talk about how to cope with chronic illness, disability, and other health issues in the academic workplace.
 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Reimbursement for Meals including Spouse  (Read 8769 times)
aandsdean
I feel affirmed that I'm truly a 6,000+ post
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 6,641

Positively impactful on stakeholder synergies


« Reply #15 on: April 14, 2008, 12:24:47 PM »

qrypt

I invoke the rules to ensure that my university continues to have tax-exempt status and our researchers continue to qualify for federal research grants.  These privileges require tax returns and financial statements, whether you appreciate or desire those services or not.

The decision to employ the president's spouse is not mine to make or change.  That recommendation did not come from accounting, but from HR.


PS:  You can only find out from the form 990 if the spousal president is an employee if s/he is among the five most highly compensated non-officer employees.

For what it's worth, I've been at two private schools where the presidents' wives (in both cases) were most definitely not employees.  There'd have been lynchings.
Logged

Wearing a black armband for Lucy
bayoucitybeancounter
Junior member
**
Posts: 95


« Reply #16 on: April 14, 2008, 01:36:34 PM »

It is no longer true that you can only find out if the president's spouse is an employee if he or she in among the five highest paid non-officers.  Refer to Schedule A, Part II line 2D.

The question is:
During the year, has the organization, either directly or indirectly, engaged in any of the following acts with any substantial contributors, trustees, directors, officers, creators, key employees, or MEMBER OF THEIR FAMILIES (emphasis mine), or with any taxable organization with which any such person is affiliated as an officer, director, trustee, majority owner, or principal beneficiary? (If the answer to any question is "Yes," attach a detailed statement explaining the transactions.)
a. Sale, exchange or leasing of property?
b. Lending of money or other extension of credit?
c. Furnishing of goods, services, or facilities?
d. Payment of compensation (or payment or reimbursement of expenses if more than $1,000)?
e. Transfer of any part of its income or assets?

It's really a very thorough, well-written question.  There's no way to dodge it with shell corporations or consulting or any of that nonsense.

Logged
aandsdean
I feel affirmed that I'm truly a 6,000+ post
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 6,641

Positively impactful on stakeholder synergies


« Reply #17 on: April 14, 2008, 02:04:33 PM »

It is no longer true that you can only find out if the president's spouse is an employee if he or she in among the five highest paid non-officers.  Refer to Schedule A, Part II line 2D.

The question is:
During the year, has the organization, either directly or indirectly, engaged in any of the following acts with any substantial contributors, trustees, directors, officers, creators, key employees, or MEMBER OF THEIR FAMILIES (emphasis mine), or with any taxable organization with which any such person is affiliated as an officer, director, trustee, majority owner, or principal beneficiary? (If the answer to any question is "Yes," attach a detailed statement explaining the transactions.)
a. Sale, exchange or leasing of property?
b. Lending of money or other extension of credit?
c. Furnishing of goods, services, or facilities?
d. Payment of compensation (or payment or reimbursement of expenses if more than $1,000)?
e. Transfer of any part of its income or assets?

It's really a very thorough, well-written question.  There's no way to dodge it with shell corporations or consulting or any of that nonsense.



I'd like to talk more about this but it would get dull for others.  For example, in many instances, trustees are also directors, presidents, etc., of local banks, and it's as sure as the sun shines that the college will be doing business with those banks, particularly if the school is in a small town where there are only small, local banks.  I presume the "detailed statement" would explain this situation?

The question you quote likely doesn't cover faculty, though, who I don't believe would be defined as officers, directors, or key employees.  Also, an individual  faculty spouse who got a couple of meals would for sure fall under the $1,000 figure in d.  A president's spouse, however, probably wouldn't fall under the $1,000.
Logged

Wearing a black armband for Lucy
bayoucitybeancounter
Junior member
**
Posts: 95


« Reply #18 on: April 14, 2008, 03:20:38 PM »

Yes, the detailed statement covers any business with your theoretical local bank, although usually it's a jargon-filled weasally-worded paragraph hitting the required buzzwords like "arms-length" and "conflict of interest policy" that doesn't really say much.

You are correct that this question doesn't cover faculty spouses.  However, even though transactions with faculty spouses are not disclosed on the university's tax return, the tax implications of such transactions are still governed by IRS regulations.

Still sucks for the faculty, who probably didn't want to be at the after-hours it's-really-additional-work function in the first place, let alone have to pick up the tab for his/her spouse who REALLY didn't want to be there.

Logged
bewildered
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 1,114


« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2008, 07:36:11 AM »

are we still talking about interview situations?  Because I can state very authoritatively that not only would my spouse not show up, but he/ she would not even be invited.

If we're not talking about interview/ restaurant situations, then I can state, equally authoritatively and unambiguously, that any time my spouse has been invited to an after-hours function, no one has presented us with a bill.  And if they did, which (to repeat) they haven't, I'm quite certain we simply wouldn't pay.

But then my experience is limited to state universities and private universities; I don't know how the other sectors handle it.
Logged
new_bus_prof
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 1,239


« Reply #20 on: June 07, 2008, 12:59:09 AM »

One state school I worked for had the departments submit a list of spousal/significant others to be requested to be included on the school's "Relocation Committee".

Spouses/Significant others were sent a small postcard asking for their willingness to serve this voluntary role, as may be requested by the dean or department, to attend "recruitment functions such as breakfasts, lunches, and dinners for possible new faculty, guests, lecturers, etc. to answer questions about relocation and the local area". It had a print name line, signature line, date, and checkbox.

The hardest part was making sure the "Relocation Committee" list was updated after divorces, separations, and ceremonies.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!