= Premium Content
Log In
|
Create a Free Account
|
Subscribe Now
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Subscribe Today
Home
News
Opinion & Ideas
Facts & Figures
Blogs
Jobs
Advice
Forums
Events
Store
Forum Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Chronicle Forums
Careers
Research Questions
edited volume--copy editing
May 29, 2012, 04:58:53 AM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Remember Me
Login with your Chronicle username and password
News
: For all you tweeters, follow
The Chronicle
on
Twitter.
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: edited volume--copy editing (Read 1121 times)
tt33_hist
Junior member
Posts: 98
edited volume--copy editing
«
on:
February 12, 2008, 05:56:57 PM »
This is my first time editing a volume and I am not sure about the "correct" procedures for the upcoming production process. The press is copy editing the ms. Do I have an ethical obligation to my authors to ask for their approval of the changes? The turnaround time is pretty quick--about 2 weeks.
Logged
englitprof
Distinguished Senior Member
Posts: 1,678
Re: edited volume--copy editing
«
Reply #1 on:
February 12, 2008, 09:59:09 PM »
I haven't dealt with this myself, though I will be in a few months and so am interested in what others with more experience have to say.
However, my inclination is that, as editor, *you* are the one with final call at this point.
Logged
"Saving just one dog won't change the world, but surely the world will change for that one dog." --unknown
infopri
I guess I'm now a VERY
Distinguished Senior Member
Posts: 18,463
When all else fails, let us agree to disagree.
Re: edited volume--copy editing
«
Reply #2 on:
February 13, 2008, 02:38:05 AM »
I have been on both sides of the editing process (although not a book), and I think you should work to get authors' approval for
any and all
changes to their work, no matter how minor. Time permitting, send the authors the schedule (for reviewing such changes) way in advance, warn them of the tight turnaround again when the window is approaching, remind them of the deadline again when they get the edited manuscript, and send them another reminder the day before the deadline. If they don't meet the deadline, they're out of luck, but you can in that case say you tried.
Also, don't forget that this review process can all be done via email (with attachments), which will eliminate postal delays.
Logged
Quote from: grasshopper on April 29, 2012, 11:27:28 AM
Your experience is not universal. Words to live by.
MYOB. Y enseņen bien a sus hijos.
gobelin
Member
Posts: 122
Re: edited volume--copy editing
«
Reply #3 on:
February 13, 2008, 09:56:07 AM »
I agree with Infopri that it's really important to get the authors to do this. Depending on the publisher, they might send the copy-edited chapters direct to individual authors (this is the way it has always worked for me, as editor and author). As Infopri says, it will really help to let the authors know of the time-scale in which this will be happening, and to keep them informed if the schedule slips. This all has to be done so quickly that it really helps to know when to expect it, and also people can let you know which address to send it to if they are away on sabbatical or something.
Logged
tenured_feminist
Distinguished Senior Member
Posts: 7,529
Re: edited volume--copy editing
«
Reply #4 on:
February 13, 2008, 10:54:53 AM »
Run it past the authors if you can. Some presses don't do this and will just ask you to answer queries, leaving the only final review opportunity for page proofs.
Logged
Quote
You people are not fooling me. I know exactly what occurred in that thread, and I know exactly what you all are doing.
seniorscholar
Distinguished Senior Member
Posts: 5,211
Re: edited volume--copy editing
«
Reply #5 on:
February 13, 2008, 02:53:09 PM »
Turnaround is always very fast at the copy editing stage. As others have said, give the authors the schedule, impress on them the importance of keeping to it, ask the press to notify you when authors' responses have been received if the authors are too dumb to cc you on it. In addition go through the copy editing of the whole thing yourself on a separate set. Then when the press's editor calls and says that author x has rewritten one-third of the essay, grab your own copy and either tell the press to skip that one or beg for time to see what's been done. And when you learn that 10 days past the deadline, author Y is not responding to requests to get the material in, you already have your copy to submit instead.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Opinion
-----------------------------
=> Discuss
Chronicle
Articles
-----------------------------
Cafe
-----------------------------
=> Meet and Greet
=> Tech Talk for Befuddled Academics
=> Conferences and Academic Travel
=> We Speak Volumes
=> Questions, Comments?
===> Frequently Asked Questions
=> Asked and Answered
===> Great Debates
-----------------------------
Careers
-----------------------------
=> Job-Seeking Experiences
===> The Two-Body Problem
=> The Interview Process
=> Balancing Work and Life
===> Health Issues on the Job
=> On the Money
=> In the Classroom
===> Online Teaching
=> Research Questions
=> Working as a Postdoc
=> The Nontenure Track
=> The Tenure Track
=> Mid-Career
=> Retiring From Academe
=> Grad-School Life
=> Diversity in the Workplace
=> Leaving Academe
=> Department Chairs and Deans
=> The Administrative Track
=> Working Abroad
===> Academics in the UK
===> Academics in the Middle East
-----------------------------
Special Topics
-----------------------------
=> Katrina, Rita, Wilma & Irene
=> Academic Libraries
=> School & College
Loading...
Copyright 2012. All Rights reserved
The Chronicle of Higher Education
1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037