next »

[drangie]

from Reuters Warsaw:

A Polish man got the shock of his life when he visited a brothel and spotted his wife among the establishment's employees. Polish tabloid Super Express said the woman had been making some extra money on the side while telling her husband she worked at a store in a nearby town.  "I was dumfounded. I thought I was dreaming," the husband told the newspaper on Wednesday.

The couple, married for 14 years, are now divorcing, the newspaper reported.

[big_giant_head]

Ah, but who busted whom? 

[slac_vap]

Why on earth would they divorce?  They sound like a perfect pair.  Maybe they could find comfort in the "Would you agree to an open marriage?" thread.

[john_proctor]

Or he could just start paying her.

(figure her lost income would be offset by his reduced spending).

Seems a potential win-win to me.

[prof_mom]

Or he could just start paying her.

(figure her lost income would be offset by his reduced spending).

Seems a potential win-win to me.

Maybe they will do that after the divorce.

[john_proctor]

Or he could just start paying her.

(figure her lost income would be offset by his reduced spending).

Seems a potential win-win to me.

Maybe they will do that after the divorce.

Yeah, but now with all the court costs, attourneys, pulling out 401ks early...

That'd be a net loss, big time.

Plus, just imagine the contractual clarity such would provide to sex (often a troublesome issue in a relationship - who wants what done to/by/with whom where how often etc).  You could have a regular set of rates, perhaps a "menu" of sorts, along with any "blackout dates" and/or hours of operation.

Further, everyone knows sex is more fun when you feel like you're getting away with something by doing it.  There could be untold potential in role play, whatever.

And there's no obligation to "snuggle" afterward; one could just go to sleep or go about the rest of the evening.

Hell, now that I think of it, I may just talk to Goody about something like that.

[slac_vap]

You know, I saw a Dr. Phil once that featured a couple that had just such an arrangement.  The wife actually printed up a menu with different prices for different acts.

When you think about it, what else was Desktop Publishing invented for?

[john_proctor]

I can only imagine.

I'm liking this idea more and more as I think about it.

"Baby, I'll take a number seven with a twist.  Oh, and 'super size' it, K?  What's that?  Oh, yeah, right it's after 11.  Umm.  What's the special tonight?"

[prof_mom]

Hell, now that I think of it, I may just talk to Goody about something like that.

Perhaps you should wait until after the wedding to have this discussion.

Perhaps this is TMI, but I prefer to have sex at the beginning of the evening. After sex it is nice to maybe take a little nap, shower and then go out to dinner or a movie or whatever. I guess this doesn't work well for people dating, but it works nicely when people live in the same house.

[threadkiller]

Hell, now that I think of it, I may just talk to Goody about something like that.

Perhaps you should wait until after the wedding to have this discussion.

Perhaps this is TMI, but I prefer to have sex at the beginning of the evening. After sex it is nice to maybe take a little nap, shower and then go out to dinner or a movie or whatever. I guess this doesn't work well for people dating, but it works nicely when people live in the same house.

Don't you have kids? ;-) I haven't had sex earlier than 9pm in years (to add to the TMI thread!)

[the_honey_badger]

Or he could just start paying her.

(figure her lost income would be offset by his reduced spending).

Seems a potential win-win to me.

Maybe they will do that after the divorce.

And there's no obligation to "snuggle" afterward; one could just go to sleep or go about the rest of the evening.

Hell, now that I think of it, I may just talk to Goody about something like that.

Uh, shouldn't you be in that stage of "love-struck, wanna snuggle and then do it again" mode of romance right now?  I mean, you just enthusiastically announced your engagement to us, if you don't want to "snuggle" now, when will you ever?

just sayin.

[prof_mom]

Hell, now that I think of it, I may just talk to Goody about something like that.

Perhaps you should wait until after the wedding to have this discussion.

Perhaps this is TMI, but I prefer to have sex at the beginning of the evening. After sex it is nice to maybe take a little nap, shower and then go out to dinner or a movie or whatever. I guess this doesn't work well for people dating, but it works nicely when people live in the same house.

Don't you have kids? ;-) I haven't had sex earlier than 9pm in years (to add to the TMI thread!)

Oh, was this supposed to represent what we actually do or what we wish we could do?

I was just sharing my fantasy. JP wants to be able to have specials of the day and order from a menu. I would like to be able to have sex, take a nap and then go out alone with my husband once in a while (in that order).

We still enforce an hour of afternoon quiet time in the house. The kids go to their rooms and the adults try to work or do other projects around the house. Sometimes we have a little happy hour or go to our room for quiet time. Will I be able to enforce quiet time when my kids are teenagers?  

[gayle]

Or he could just start paying her.

(figure her lost income would be offset by his reduced spending).

Seems a potential win-win to me.

Maybe they will do that after the divorce.

Yeah, but now with all the court costs, attourneys, pulling out 401ks early...

That'd be a net loss, big time.

Plus, just imagine the contractual clarity such would provide to sex (often a troublesome issue in a relationship - who wants what done to/by/with whom where how often etc).  You could have a regular set of rates, perhaps a "menu" of sorts, along with any "blackout dates" and/or hours of operation.

Further, everyone knows sex is more fun when you feel like you're getting away with something by doing it.  There could be untold potential in role play, whatever.

And there's no obligation to "snuggle" afterward; one could just go to sleep or go about the rest of the evening.

Hell, now that I think of it, I may just talk to Goody about something like that.

Here's a sample for you:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0217062contract1.html

[john_proctor]

Or he could just start paying her.

(figure her lost income would be offset by his reduced spending).

Seems a potential win-win to me.

Maybe they will do that after the divorce.

And there's no obligation to "snuggle" afterward; one could just go to sleep or go about the rest of the evening.

Hell, now that I think of it, I may just talk to Goody about something like that.

Uh, shouldn't you be in that stage of "love-struck, wanna snuggle and then do it again" mode of romance right now?  I mean, you just enthusiastically announced your engagement to us, if you don't want to "snuggle" now, when will you ever?

just sayin.

Oh, I've never had a snuggle phase (one of the things about Goody I really admire is that she doesn't have much of one).

Now, the do-it-again part, I can certainly endorse (and will gladly snuggle briefly during the "down time").  But I'd be just as happy getting up, getting a beer, etc. until the second time rolls around.

[wild_rose]

Now, the do-it-again part, I can certainly endorse (and will gladly snuggle briefly during the "down time").  But I'd be just as happy getting up, getting a beer, etc. until the second time rolls around.

Clearly that's a fantasy. In real life, I can only imagine where that beer would end up.