• Tuesday, May 29, 2012
May 29, 2012, 12:06:35 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with your Chronicle username and password
News: Talk about how to cope with chronic illness, disability, and other health issues in the academic workplace.
 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Presses' reputations - matters less here?  (Read 3769 times)
mamakath
New member
*
Posts: 1


« on: October 23, 2007, 05:57:40 AM »

I've just started as a lecturer in a very good humanities department, and am looking to publish my book-of-the-thesis.  I've read a lot on the Chronicle fora about the importance of publishing with a press that's well thought of, but I've noticed that many of my new colleagues, and many in my old department (both of which were 5* departments) have published with Rodopi, or Peter Lang, or Edwin Mellen - certainly not prestigious presses and in case of the latter two, publishers that are often referred to as "vanity presses" on the fora.  Does it just matter a lot less where you publish in the UK?  Should I only worry about the reputation of the press I publish with if I'm going to be looking for jobs in the US?

Just curious...
Logged
sandgrounder
Senior member
****
Posts: 297


« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2007, 07:15:02 AM »

No where it's published is very important in the UK or at least. Big university presses are preferred then each discipline will have its pecking order.
I've only ever heard of Peter Lang of the three you mention: I do know that they do publish a lot of edited workshop proceedings in my field which may explain any chapters there - especially if the editor is from Belgium or the Netherlands. Rather surprised that unless you're from the Netherlands or Belgium where it does seem to have a different status you'd choose it for a book. Although I think they will publish unedited PhD dissertations: this is sometimes necessary to be awarded the degree at some European universities so possibily another explanation.
Logged
argos1227
Junior member
**
Posts: 56


« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2007, 01:48:43 PM »

FYI:  There's a newer thread on Lang that has some international flavo(u)r here:

http://chronicle.com/forums/index.php/topic,42838.0.html
Logged

Anonymity is not an excuse to be evil.
brummagem
New member
*
Posts: 28


« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2007, 06:37:39 AM »

I appreciate Sandgrounder's response, but was wondering if others might weigh in.

Like the OP, I have noticed that many scholars in 5* departments seem to publish with non-university presses, including some that are (unfairly) maligned on this board (like Peter Lang). I realise that the answer to the original query is likely discipline-specific in some ways (I am in cultural studies, if that helps), but it is my impression, overall, that the publisher does not matter so much here as it does in the tenure-track crazy US.
Logged
snape
Senior member
****
Posts: 449


« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2007, 10:01:53 AM »

I am in Russell group university with colleagues who are well known and have published with Peter Lang.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!