• Tuesday, May 29, 2012
May 29, 2012, 02:27:01 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with your Chronicle username and password
News: Talk about how to cope with chronic illness, disability, and other health issues in the academic workplace.
 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 138
  Print  
Author Topic: Oxford Round Table  (Read 403675 times)
untenured
On far too many committees
Member-Moderator
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 5,625


« Reply #15 on: December 15, 2006, 10:25:14 AM »

*scratches head*  Hmm...

The ORT are smart critters, aren't they.  If they have a disclaimer that can make a difference.  Also, if they do not reference Oxford University they may not infringe.  Still, the clear implication from their overall literature is that they carry the prestige and the associaton of the great institution.  There has to be *something* Oxford could do.  Maybe not.

Untenured

 
Logged

Quote from: kedves link=topic=56697.msg1152543#msg1152543
You are among the Pure and Truthful, however small their Number.
My goodness, that was an exceptionally good analysis of the forum.
ukprof
New member
*
Posts: 7


« Reply #16 on: December 18, 2006, 10:24:14 AM »

There is something the University can do, and it would appear that this is in the works. I have heard back from the Principal of one of the Colleges the group uses and he has contacted the Roundtable to tell them to amend their website (beyond the vague disclaimer) and has appointed a small committee to look at this in-house. Obviously, the group can use 'Oxford' as a name, in that they run a conference in the city of Oxford.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2007, 10:15:08 AM by moderator » Logged
snape
Senior member
****
Posts: 449


« Reply #17 on: December 18, 2006, 11:53:41 AM »

I presume the ORT has mass-mailed presumably thousands of faculty over a period of years about this event.  I presume thousands because folks of all stripes, professions, and regions seem to get these letters.  The university must be aware by now what is going on.  I cannot see how they are not aware.

As for other schools, I conclude that people genuinely believe they have been invited to something prestigious:

http://www.erskine.edu/news/ro.08.04.04.html - PR article about Erskine College dean of students invited.  The article talks about Oxford U.

http://www.marshallparthenon.com/media/storage/paper534/news/2005/11/18/News/Mu.Professor.Invited.To.Oxford.Round.Table-1110698.shtml?norewrite200612141151&sourcedomain=www.marshallparthenon.com

Apparently it's a big deal at Marshall University too.

Note this quote, "She will join a small group of approximately 35 academics, lawyers and public officials from all over the world who have an interest in or work in the criminal justice field. "

Just search for "Oxford Round Table" on yahoo and you will see school after school that lists attendance by one of its faculty with pride.

Untenured

According to the Marshall U website there are seven colleges in Oxford. According to the Oxford University website there are 39!
« Last Edit: September 14, 2007, 10:19:56 AM by moderator » Logged
gastr1
Senior member
****
Posts: 441


« Reply #18 on: December 20, 2006, 10:10:36 PM »

Ah, but what trademarks are they infringing? Oxford (the uni) owns the rights to the "University of Oxford" and "Oxford University" names and is very good nowadays at protecting them, but it has no rights in respect of the name "Oxford". In fact, Oxford has been attached to so many things over the past couple of hundred years that I suspect it's pretty much fair game in trademark terms. As long as the ORT people make sure that they have a disclaimer saying that they're not the University (and they do), all the university can do is grind its teeth in frustration.

Maybe they don't have much legal recourse, but they could stop renting their facilities to these fools that are profiting off of the school's reputation, couldn't they? That would be a start.
Logged

"Gastr1 should not touch Cezanne, it's a travesty that gastr1 does it. Gastr1 must stay within Rothko and Svartz."
august
Hoping one day to be a distinguished
Senior member
****
Posts: 742


« Reply #19 on: December 20, 2006, 10:49:01 PM »

I've been getting these invitations for about four years now, since I've had a tt job.  However, this last year a senior colleague was "invited" to give a paper at Oxford, got funding for it from our University, and then went with his wife and took pictures, etc.  Anyway, I thought it was very legit and was so impressed.  In fact, the chair emailed everyone when he went.  Come to find out, it was ORT.  Wow.
Logged

I want to believe...
ontrack08
New member
*
Posts: 2


« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2007, 01:21:00 PM »

While I greatly appreciate the fact that technology allwas individuals to express themselves and their opinions on various academic topics it is troublesome that individuals such "untenured," (username clearly indicates lack of a credibility) go great lengths to spread false negatives. People should do there homework before falsely accuse an organization of being a sham. I hate these blogs things but I have to say I was compelled to defend my experience at the Roundtable. I am part of a highly regarded institution of higher learning and many of my colleages, including several university presidents and deans find the Roundtable to be a successful legitimate academic arena where individuals from all over the world come to share and expand ideas,thoughts, and feelings in a presitigous manner. Maybe some of you should spend more time on your profession than spending time on a computer slandering an activity you nothing about. Attendees papers are given an opportunity to have their paper reviewed and published in a legitmate journal that is found in  university libraries. I met people with backgrounds that would never include a sham outfit. I have no idea what the selction criteria is nor do I care ...I went on the university's dime and gained knowledge and made some friends. The former Israeli Minister of Education has even attended.
Logged
untenured
On far too many committees
Member-Moderator
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 5,625


« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2007, 01:59:27 PM »

I simply cannot let "ontrack08" pearls of wisdom pass by without reply.

While I greatly appreciate the fact that technology allwas individuals to express themselves and their opinions on various academic topics it is troublesome that individuals such "untenured," (username clearly indicates lack of a credibility) go great lengths to spread false negatives.

Let me get this straight.  Because I call myself "unternured" as my user name, this "clearly indicates a lack of credibility" on my part.  Does crazybatlady belong in an asylum because she chooses such a name?  Do academics without tenure simply have no credibility to you when they post simply because they do not have tenure?  How can you even assume that I do not have tenure?  It's a username, nothing more.

People should do there homework before falsely accuse an organization of being a sham. I hate these blogs things but I have to say I was compelled to defend my experience at the Roundtable. I am part of a highly regarded institution of higher learning and many of my colleages, including several university presidents and deans find the Roundtable to be a successful legitimate academic arena where individuals from all over the world come to share and expand ideas,thoughts, and feelings in a presitigous manner.

Ok, you've written words and formed sentences, but you have not really *said* anything.  An event is not prestigious or legitimate simply because you (someone who evaluates credibility by username) claims it to be such.  How many attendees from top-ranked schools attended?  I also seriously doubt that "several university presidents and deans" attended your roundtable.  If so, please list them.  I'd be happy to read your list.

Maybe some of you should spend more time on your profession than spending time on a computer slandering an activity you nothing about.

I have not attended ORT.  However, I do know something about ORT.  I have received their mailings.  I have listened to others who received their mailings.  Based upon what I articulate above, I conclude that attending ORT is non-selective and non-prestigious.  See my earlier posts.  In addition, reasonable evidence exists that ORT simply leeches of the prestige of the University name.


Attendees papers are given an opportunity to have their paper reviewed and published in a legitmate journal that is found in  university libraries.

A "legitimate journal that is found in university libraries"?  That's the language scholars use to describe a bottom of the barrel publication outlet.  Legitimate.  What journal isn't "legitimate"?  What journal isn't found in at least 2 libraries?  Really, now.


I met people with backgrounds that would never include a sham outfit.

I never said that the people who attended are from "sham outfits."  I do say that ORT just might be non-prestigious and trading off the prestige of a truly meritoroius university.

I have no idea what the selction criteria is nor do I care

Really, now?  That's wonderful, just wonderful.  You'll have a great future in academia.

...I went on the university's dime and gained knowledge and made some friends.

So because the university paid you to go selectivity does not matter?  I'm sure your administrators would not want to hear this.

The former Israeli Minister of Education has even attended.

And he received a nice trip to the UK.  Good for her.



Listen, ontrack08, here's what happened.  You read the thread and were shocked to learn that the wonderful conference you attended was not what it really seems.  You can't really admit that to yourself though.  Too much of your self-esteem is attached to your attendance.  So, you lash out and attack others in this thread (see the name/credibility statement above) and make vague assertions about quality.  Deep down, your feelings are hurt.  You just learned that maybe, just maybe, ORT took you for a ride.

The bottom line is ORT could be a wonderful, highly-selective, and elite event where the best of the best scholars meet, present, and discuss.  I cannot for say for sure.  I can only evaluate based upon the evidence I have.  That evidence, however, is not promising.

You know what, on further reflection I think ORT was just right for you, ontrack08.  The perfect conference for your interest in abilities.  I'm glad you had a good time.

Untenured



« Last Edit: September 14, 2007, 10:25:05 AM by moderator » Logged

Quote from: kedves link=topic=56697.msg1152543#msg1152543
You are among the Pure and Truthful, however small their Number.
My goodness, that was an exceptionally good analysis of the forum.
americanist
Senior member
****
Posts: 648


« Reply #22 on: January 30, 2007, 03:49:15 PM »

If the ORT "allwas" individuals like ontrack08 into "there" conference, then I think that says all we need to know about ORT.
Logged
patagonia
Junior member
**
Posts: 57


« Reply #23 on: January 30, 2007, 09:28:00 PM »

Thank you for your thoughtful response, untenured. I regularly receive solicitations from ORT and they go right into the trash. I would rather spend my time and effort on conferences that are taken seriously at my university and by colleagues in my discipline. Not long ago, we had a junior faculty member who was not retained because all he/she had added to his/her vitae for the year was the ORT conference and the ORT publication.
Logged

"I have never forced anyone to do anything. I have done everything you've heard."

"Can you see anything in the dark, with your sunglasses on?" she asked me.
    "The big show is inside my head," I said.
Kurt Vonnegut, Breakfast of Champions..
snape
Senior member
****
Posts: 449


« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2007, 10:06:45 AM »

The former Israeli Minister of Education has even attended.

I saw a former British Prime Minister in a bookshop. Doesn't make it a prestigious conference.
Logged
snape
Senior member
****
Posts: 449


« Reply #25 on: January 31, 2007, 10:11:55 AM »


Attendees papers are given an opportunity to have their paper reviewed and published in a legitmate journal that is found in  university libraries.

A "legitimate journal that is found in university libraries"?  That's the language scholars use to describe a bottom of the barrel publication outlet.  Legitimate.  What journal isn't "legitimate"?  What journal isn't found in at least 2 libraries?  Really, now.


I've published several articles in the Journal of Legitimate Studies


Logged
ontrack08
New member
*
Posts: 2


« Reply #26 on: January 31, 2007, 02:19:22 PM »

Wow I'm impressed that individuals has so much free time time to spend on blog. I bet you all are so proud of yourselves attacking a non-professional blogger who has better than things to do then sit in front of a computer all day and check my errors. Untenured, what's in a name? So Oxford shirts, Oxford shoes and other items you possibly couldn't own are using the name of a prestigious university? Your arguments and facts are based on a bunch hearsay from bloggers on an open forum who are nothing more than a bunch of bored nobodies. The Chronicle of Higher Education, back in the early 90s had an article about the ORT and get this...the article was a positve informative piece of writing unlike this thread. I'm not going to waste my time blogging with individuals who aren't well-informed and to the few who think the ORT is sham keep thinking that. I think you guys are the joke and god help those actually have to learn from you. The lack of class and professionalism you shown on an open forum clearly indicates how you really are. I'll start a thread about how university lprofs. are spending more time on computers blogging with buddies and wasting university moneyand the students time. There are alot more of individuals like myself who think there ORT experience was a positive one. They are using their time more wisely by applying what they learned from attending the ORT and not spending it on useless threads. Please feel free to fire back, we know you have nothing to do. Don't get offended if I don't respond to to a few useless academic wannabees
Logged
john_proctor
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 7,027


« Reply #27 on: January 31, 2007, 03:29:31 PM »

Wow I'm impressed that individuals has so much free time time to spend on blog. I bet you all are so proud of yourselves attacking a non-professional blogger who has better than things to do then sit in front of a computer all day and check my errors. Untenured, what's in a name? So Oxford shirts, Oxford shoes and other items you possibly couldn't own are using the name of a prestigious university? Your arguments and facts are based on a bunch hearsay from bloggers on an open forum who are nothing more than a bunch of bored nobodies. The Chronicle of Higher Education, back in the early 90s had an article about the ORT and get this...the article was a positve informative piece of writing unlike this thread. I'm not going to waste my time blogging with individuals who aren't well-informed and to the few who think the ORT is sham keep thinking that. I think you guys are the joke and god help those actually have to learn from you. The lack of class and professionalism you shown on an open forum clearly indicates how you really are. I'll start a thread about how university lprofs. are spending more time on computers blogging with buddies and wasting university moneyand the students time. There are alot more of individuals like myself who think there ORT experience was a positive one. They are using their time more wisely by applying what they learned from attending the ORT and not spending it on useless threads. Please feel free to fire back, we know you have nothing to do. Don't get offended if I don't respond to to a few useless academic wannabees

Well, I, for one, shall now have to rethink everything-about ORT, about my career, about my use of time, about my pedagogic approach, about my publications, about everything. 

Thank you.  Thank you, ontrack08.
Logged

"Look upon me! I'll show you the 'life of the mind.'"
spork
If you are reading this, I am naked.
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 13,194


« Reply #28 on: January 31, 2007, 05:54:27 PM »

I go to Davos instead.
Logged

a.k.a. gum-chewing monkey in a Tufts University jacket

"Please do not force people who are exhausted to take medication for hallucinations." -- Memo from the Chair, Department of White Privilege Studies, Fiork University
socsci
Senior member
****
Posts: 476


« Reply #29 on: January 31, 2007, 07:23:39 PM »

I go to Davos instead.

Showoff!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 138
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!