• Saturday, February 18, 2012
February 18, 2012, 05:56:55 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with your Chronicle username and password
News: For all you tweeters, follow The Chronicle on Twitter.
 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
  Print  
Author Topic: "Anglo-Saxon" instead of "white"?  (Read 29072 times)
larryc
Hu hatin'
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 17,565

Eschew the hu.


WWW
« Reply #45 on: October 15, 2006, 12:17:27 AM »

Hmmm, maybe the author is trying for a generic term that encompasses different sorts of white people. I sometimes write about fur traders in the Pacific Northwest in the early 1800s--Americans, English, French Canadian, Scots, and a smattering of others.  When I get tired of writing "white" I am hard-pressed for another term. I have written Euro-American but that is so awkward.
Logged

martina
Member
***
Posts: 160


« Reply #46 on: October 15, 2006, 03:28:19 AM »

In Israel the term Anglo-Saxons is used to refer to anyone who is a native speaker of English (South Africans, Brits, Canadians, Americans, Australians, etc.)- which when you think about it is bizarre, as very few people who live in Israel (and even those who speak English) have any Anglo-Saxon heritage!
Logged
crazybatlady
The Very First
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 4,730


« Reply #47 on: October 15, 2006, 09:52:35 AM »

Hmmm, maybe the author is trying for a generic term that encompasses different sorts of white people. I sometimes write about fur traders in the Pacific Northwest in the early 1800s--Americans, English, French Canadian, Scots, and a smattering of others.  When I get tired of writing "white" I am hard-pressed for another term. I have written Euro-American but that is so awkward.

Thank you for your reply, Larry.  I value your opinion greatly and in this case even more so because it sounds like you write within the same area as the author of this article.

So:

It seems like I might be overreading the use of this term?  That in fact the author is just using it to avoid the repetitiveness of white, white, white?  (And why is this author capitalizing white?  Do you do that too?)

However, I understand if the author is trying to use the terminology of the era, but he doesn't seem to be using it properly--he calls a group of explorers that seems to include an Italian "Anglo-Saxon", for example.  I wish I had the article here so I could quote it.

I guess I'd conclude that he's using the same term that the explorers did, but not in the same way; instead, he's using it more like we understand it today--which seems like sloppy scholarship to me.

Is this an unfair conclusion?
Logged

As always, CBL rules!  All hail the CBL!
larryc
Hu hatin'
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 17,565

Eschew the hu.


WWW
« Reply #48 on: October 15, 2006, 10:19:55 AM »

I think you should email the author and get to the bottom of this.  I have no idea why an 1890 Italian in Alaska would have been described as Anglo-Saxon, either then or now. I do not capitalize white, or black, but I do Indian or African American.  All standard usage.
Logged

helpful
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 8,910


« Reply #49 on: October 15, 2006, 10:42:27 AM »

It has always been my understanding that "Anglo-Saxon" refers to people, white or otherwise, who trace their ancestry to the British Isles and/or Germany. Scotish Americans, for example, are a subset of that group. 

The Scots, and the Irish, and the Welsh, are of Celt heritage, not Anglo-Saxon. Completely different group.
Logged
crazybatlady
The Very First
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 4,730


« Reply #50 on: October 15, 2006, 11:14:03 AM »

I've found the email address and will get to the bottom of this (tactfully and kindly, of course).

Thanks for everyone's help.
Logged

As always, CBL rules!  All hail the CBL!
zharkov
or, the modern Prometheus.
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 8,523


« Reply #51 on: October 15, 2006, 03:06:52 PM »

It has always been my understanding that "Anglo-Saxon" refers to people, white or otherwise, who trace their ancestry to the British Isles and/or Germany. Scotish Americans, for example, are a subset of that group. 

The Scots, and the Irish, and the Welsh, are of Celt heritage, not Anglo-Saxon. Completely different group.

And a lot of those from the British Isles have Norman last names, not Anglo-Saxon.  The last Anglo-Saxon English king was in 1066; mostly Normans since then, toss in some Dutch and German, too. 



Logged

__________
Zharkov's Razor:
Adapting Zharkov a bit to this situation, ignorance and confusion can explain a lot.
gennimom
Somewhat Southern (Have I really posted that much?)
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 16,764

Let's get summer over with! Me want snow!


« Reply #52 on: October 17, 2006, 10:47:43 PM »

Hmm. I always thought I was a WASP. I guess I'm not since my brother's geneological efforts have shown we have German, Swedish, Scots, and probably Irish in us, as well as English. Heh.
Logged

...only after reading gm's post, my new mantra is "always listen to gennimom".
Monday reeks! - Garfield
The outside of a horse is good for the inside of a person (or something like that).
supernumerary
Senior member
****
Posts: 638


« Reply #53 on: October 17, 2006, 11:01:30 PM »

I've just been reading that the Germans referred to the Brits and Americans in the 1930s as 'Anglo-Saxon' regardless of provenance. Don't know if they still do, but since the French certainly do, I'm wondering whether Anglo-Saxon isn't just used to mean 'English-speaking', i.e. it's more about language than race: Anglo-Saxon is an English-speaking white person. That would explain what some posters have said about Celtic peoples being called Anglo-Saxon, and what Martina was saying about Israel.
Logged
gennimom
Somewhat Southern (Have I really posted that much?)
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 16,764

Let's get summer over with! Me want snow!


« Reply #54 on: October 17, 2006, 11:06:46 PM »

You know, at one time these words may have had clear definitions, but I would be willing to bet that time and all of the changes that have happened since then have made their usage not so clear cut. There seems to be a lot of words out there that don't mean quite the same thing they used to.
We can look at the fact that the original speakers of English probably wouldn't be able to understand us today.
Logged

...only after reading gm's post, my new mantra is "always listen to gennimom".
Monday reeks! - Garfield
The outside of a horse is good for the inside of a person (or something like that).
adhoc
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 1,409


« Reply #55 on: October 17, 2006, 11:13:43 PM »

The "Saxon" in "Anglo-Saxon" refers to Germany.
Logged
gennimom
Somewhat Southern (Have I really posted that much?)
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 16,764

Let's get summer over with! Me want snow!


« Reply #56 on: October 17, 2006, 11:15:37 PM »

Ugh. I think I'm getting lost now. Although my brain seems to be trying to remind me I heard that somewhere before. Maybe I am a WASP? I don't know anymore. *sigh*
May be getting close to time for bed. Food first though.
Logged

...only after reading gm's post, my new mantra is "always listen to gennimom".
Monday reeks! - Garfield
The outside of a horse is good for the inside of a person (or something like that).
supernumerary
Senior member
****
Posts: 638


« Reply #57 on: October 17, 2006, 11:19:55 PM »

It does indeed, adhoc, which is what makes it so interesting to read the things the Germans said about the 'Anglo-Saxons' in the 1930s. This being between the wars it wasn't flattering. The irony is striking, but again it's just a use of language since in terms of 'blood' many Brits and Americans at the time were (are?) every bit as German as any German from Germany (language and culture apart).
Logged
dr_stones
We broke a six-pack in the store to get just one
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 5,445

пошлите законоведами пушки и деньг


« Reply #58 on: October 18, 2006, 06:39:09 AM »

"White, Anglo" is a term used to broadly describe Caucasians who speak English, in order to differentiate them from caucasians of Latino heritage.  But Anglo-Saxon is too narrow to even encapsulate the hsitoric English-speakers of the world . . . I dare say, were one to go into a bar in Dublin or Edinborough or Aberystwyth and refer to a patron as an "Anglo-Saxo,"  one'd likely find a celtic Irish, celtic Scottish, or Welsh fist amidst your teeth.



Logged

"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Samuel "Steroid Free" Clemens
helpful
Distinguished Senior Member
*****
Posts: 8,910


« Reply #59 on: October 18, 2006, 08:42:23 AM »

"White, Anglo" is a term used to broadly describe Caucasians who speak English, in order to differentiate them from caucasians of Latino heritage.  But Anglo-Saxon is too narrow to even encapsulate the hsitoric English-speakers of the world . . . I dare say, were one to go into a bar in Dublin or Edinborough or Aberystwyth and refer to a patron as an "Anglo-Saxo,"  one'd likely find a celtic Irish, celtic Scottish, or Welsh fist amidst your teeth.





As I have pointed out before, even the term "Caucasian" has doubtful origins, so I don't use it.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!