Hi Dale!
(I hope the OP doesn't mind a tiny bit of a hijack here-he/she knows I'm a kindred spirit with a similar mission)
You said:
"Academic advising at the entry level/front line is not about filling out paperwork or about matching students with classes that fit their 11 am - 2 pm class-taking window."
***
Even so, I am finding in my advisor interviewing sessions that the committees are VERY squeamish about how a PhD will handle the more "repetitive" aspects of the job. They fear I won't stick around because of the drudgery aspects.
This varies from institution to institution. At mine, we have a significant number of advisers with Ph.D. from various liberal arts backgrounds (quite a few English Ph.D.'s actually). These are individuals who value their Ph.D. educations and the academic environment but decided that they preferred student services and administration to the classroom.
Kind of like a teaching philosophy, an applicant for an advising position should have something of an advising philosophy. What do you think an adviser should be able to do for students, given the right conditions?