The Chronicle of Higher Education
Forums
July 24, 2008, 02:32:20 PM *
Welcome, Guest. To post on these forums, please login or register.

Login with your Chronicle username and password
Highlights: Talk online about your experiences as an adjunct, visiting assistant professor, postdoc, or other contract faculty member.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The pressure cooker  (Read 3380 times)
chronicle_moderator
Staff
Junior member
*****
Posts: 59


View Profile
« on: June 30, 2006, 02:03:51 PM »

The chancellor of the University of California at Santa Cruz apparently committed suicide late last month, after a tenure beset with harsh criticism from students, employees, government officials, and the public. Experts on university leadership say the life of a college leader has become more complex, exhausting, and lonely in recent years, and the job has become harder to succeed at. Should the structure of leadership be changed to put fewer demands on the president? What other kinds of support might be offered to college leaders?
Read more...
Logged
bendedominicis
New member
*
Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2006, 10:52:24 AM »

Publication of the goals in relation to the institutional mission by which the President's performance will undergo periodic evaluation would assist much in facilitating effective communication throughout the institution among all stakeholders, in my view.  Unfortunately, at the American University in Bulgaria, the Board of Trustees has not publicized the criteria by which it will evaluate the new President which the Board hired in 2005.  The only information circulating consists of off-hand remarks that the President has to raise a certain sum of money in unrestricted funds.  I saw last year in another _Chronicle_ article that a California judge ruled that publication of the goals which the new President of a California state university campus should meet was not mandatory.  I can only wonder what the justification for such a decision would be.  Both AUBG and this California institution are US taxpayer-funded institutions, the former by the US Agency for International Development.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC

Articles for Discussion

  1. The Hardest Sell in Fund Raising: Attracting Talent
  2. A Midlife Crisis Hits College Campuses
  3. Balancing Work and Life at Indiana Wesleyan
  4. Virginia Wesleyan Revises Its Tenure Policy
  5. Your First Real Taste of Academic Culture
  6. How Not to Evaluate Your Department Head
  7. Reflections on the First Year
  8. Thrills and Chills at Tenure-Track Park
  9. Visions and Revisions
  10. Blackboard Says New Tool Will Synchronize With Competitor
  11. Dispute Over the Economics of File Sharing Intensifies
  12. When Politicians Come Calling

Live Discussions

Brown Bag

The Brown Bag: Read a transcript of an online discussion with Alan Contreras, a higher-education official in Oregon and longtime critic of the ease with which diploma mills operate in the United States, about whether much has changed in the four years since The Chronicle published a long report on the booming industry in spurious degrees, and what, if anything, is to be done.

Brown Bag

The Brown Bag: Barbara A. Lee, an expert in higher-education law and a professor at Rutgers University at New Brunswick, will answer questions and share strategies for navigating difficult classroom conversations and controversial topics while teaching, without landing yourself — or your institution — in a lawsuit. Join us for a live online chat, on Thursday, August 21, at 12 noon, U.S. Eastern time.

Previous discussions