= Premium Content
Log In
|
Create a Free Account
|
Subscribe Now
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Subscribe Today
Home
News
Opinion & Ideas
Facts & Figures
Blogs
Jobs
Advice
Forums
Events
Forum Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Chronicle Forums
Careers
Working Abroad
Academics in the UK
Industrial action - state of play
February 19, 2012, 03:19:47 AM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Remember Me
Login with your Chronicle username and password
News
: For all you tweeters, follow
The Chronicle
on
Twitter.
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Industrial action - state of play (Read 4447 times)
Also in the UK
Guest
Industrial action - state of play
«
on:
May 26, 2006, 04:22:42 AM »
I see the BBC website quotes the UCEA as saying a breakthrough is imminent? Is this other peoples' sense? I am in the Philippines on fieldwork and needless to say information is sketchy...
Thanks
[%sig%]
Logged
ExPat in UK
Guest
Re: Industrial action - state of play
«
Reply #1 on:
May 26, 2006, 04:35:23 AM »
You know as much as we do... I guess the best way to follow the information is from the web sites of the two unions.
Logged
Lucy
Guest
Re: Industrial action - state of play
«
Reply #2 on:
May 27, 2006, 06:10:44 AM »
They didn't make a new offer yet. It seems possible that one will be made on Tuesday. In any case, at least they are talking, which is a start.
Logged
UK too
Guest
Re: Industrial action - state of play
«
Reply #3 on:
May 27, 2006, 08:48:02 AM »
11% over two years is the gossip here on the offer.
Doesn't seem so good to me....
Logged
science expat
Guest
Re: would a 2 year deal be satisfactory?
«
Reply #4 on:
May 28, 2006, 06:30:55 AM »
This question comes from a query on ExPat's thread below as well as a comment on this one so I thought I'd move it up the list.
Both UK too's gossip and my own reading of the tea leaves (i.e. the unions implying that a 2 year deal could be possible) suggest that the offer will be X over two years.
I'm not in the union but would like to know what you'd accept. And, how p*ssed off are you and why?
ExPat's answer to essentially the same query is copied below.
Cheers!
ExPat in UK wrote:
> science expat wrote:
>
> > What do you think, is the offer likely to be 10-11% over 2
> > years? If so, will the union members support it?
>
> I really am clueless about what the offer will be. As for
> support... hmmm... we had a branch meeting last week and there
> were over 100 folks there... that's about 95 more than normally
> attend. OK, that's what I was told... it was my first meeting.
> I've been a union member ever since I joined to protect myself
> from a harassing associate dean!
>
> Everyone I know (even folks not in the Union) are totally
> p*ssed (American use of the term) with the employers and their
> actions.
>
> If the deal is only for 2 years, does this mean we go through
> this carnival again in 2008????
[%sig%]
Logged
UK too
Guest
Re: would a 2 year deal be satisfactory?
«
Reply #5 on:
May 28, 2006, 06:37:03 AM »
I think if the offer were to match or better the previous three year offer but be spread over two years that would be at the limits of acceptability. If it is indeed 11% over two years I think people would be highly upset as it would indicate another AUT capitulation.
Even if the offer is good and is accepted the feeling at my institution is that it will take a lot to mend bridges between the employers and employees. The behaviour of the employers, from lying to docking wages to renaging on promises has been nothing short of shocking and I am certainly considering whether I want to continue if the higher ed sector in the UK.
Logged
ExPat in UK
Guest
The Guardian Says
«
Reply #6 on:
May 28, 2006, 05:13:35 PM »
According to the Guardian the pay offer will be 10.33 for two years... but... and here's the point that the unions will refuse: there can be NO industrial action in year 3
Logged
puzzled
Guest
Re: would a 2 year deal be satisfactory?
«
Reply #7 on:
May 29, 2006, 07:13:54 AM »
puzzled...what's the logic of agreeing to a two-year deal of 10.33% instead of the initial offer of 12.6 over three years?
Logged
Scottish snr lecturer
Guest
We've got 12.6% over 3 yrs
«
Reply #8 on:
May 29, 2006, 07:53:56 AM »
And we'll take that - thanks!
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Opinion
-----------------------------
=> Discuss
Chronicle
Articles
-----------------------------
Cafe
-----------------------------
=> Meet and Greet
=> Tech Talk for Befuddled Academics
=> Conferences and Academic Travel
=> We Speak Volumes
=> Questions, Comments?
===> Frequently Asked Questions
=> Asked and Answered
===> Great Debates
-----------------------------
Careers
-----------------------------
=> Job-Seeking Experiences
===> The Two-Body Problem
=> The Interview Process
=> Balancing Work and Life
===> Health Issues on the Job
=> On the Money
=> In the Classroom
===> Online Teaching
=> Research Questions
=> Working as a Postdoc
=> The Nontenure Track
=> The Tenure Track
=> Mid-Career
=> Retiring From Academe
=> Grad-School Life
=> Diversity in the Workplace
=> Leaving Academe
=> Department Chairs and Deans
=> The Administrative Track
=> Working Abroad
===> Academics in the UK
===> Academics in the Middle East
-----------------------------
Special Topics
-----------------------------
=> Katrina, Rita, Wilma & Irene
=> Academic Libraries
=> School & College
Loading...
Copyright 2012. All Rights reserved
The Chronicle of Higher Education
1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037