= Premium Content
Log In
|
Create a Free Account
|
Subscribe Now
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Subscribe Today
Home
News
Opinion & Ideas
Facts & Figures
Blogs
Jobs
Advice
Forums
Events
Forum Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Chronicle Forums
Careers
Job-Seeking Experiences
application technicalities!
February 18, 2012, 10:24:08 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Remember Me
Login with your Chronicle username and password
News
: For all you tweeters, follow
The Chronicle
on
Twitter.
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: application technicalities! (Read 2860 times)
whazzit
Guest
application technicalities!
«
on:
October 19, 2005, 01:15:28 PM »
Here are a couple of small procedural questions, and apologies if they've been covered elsewhere:
when applying, is it OK to use plain ol' regular white printing paper? Or is nicer paper with institutional letterhead preferred?
this might be really tiny: is it OK to fold application materials in a small envelope? or is it better to use those large manila envelopes?
I know these are petty questions. But hey, you know how it is.
Logged
anon
Guest
Re: application technicalities!
«
Reply #1 on:
October 19, 2005, 01:25:56 PM »
plain paper is fine, letterhead is good, fancy paper is silly.
large manilla please, when we put those folded materials, which are folded for 3-5 days, back into manilla folders, they take extra space.
how are you folding these application anyway?
letter 2-4 pages
vita 4-11 pages
+ whatever else....
Logged
squidward
Guest
Re: application technicalities!
«
Reply #2 on:
October 19, 2005, 01:48:56 PM »
Applications also tend to get xeroxed, so folded papers (or stapled ones) would not go through the automatic feeder too well. It could jam everything up, and ruin your application, at which point they would throw it in the trash and never tell you (just being facetious to add to your paranoia).
Logged
Bboy
Guest
application technicalities
«
Reply #3 on:
October 19, 2005, 02:36:26 PM »
whazzit wrote:
> when applying, is it OK to use plain ol' regular white printing
> paper? Or is nicer paper with institutional letterhead
> preferred?
>
I once knew a professor who wouldn't look at CVs on fancy paper (meaning, colorful, or thick bond, not "letterhead-fancy"). They thought it was pretentious, and was an unsubstantiated attempt to get noticed.
I would spend more time on double checking for typos, error, consistencies, etc.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Opinion
-----------------------------
=> Discuss
Chronicle
Articles
-----------------------------
Cafe
-----------------------------
=> Meet and Greet
=> Tech Talk for Befuddled Academics
=> Conferences and Academic Travel
=> We Speak Volumes
=> Questions, Comments?
===> Frequently Asked Questions
=> Asked and Answered
===> Great Debates
-----------------------------
Careers
-----------------------------
=> Job-Seeking Experiences
===> The Two-Body Problem
=> The Interview Process
=> Balancing Work and Life
===> Health Issues on the Job
=> On the Money
=> In the Classroom
===> Online Teaching
=> Research Questions
=> Working as a Postdoc
=> The Nontenure Track
=> The Tenure Track
=> Mid-Career
=> Retiring From Academe
=> Grad-School Life
=> Diversity in the Workplace
=> Leaving Academe
=> Department Chairs and Deans
=> The Administrative Track
=> Working Abroad
===> Academics in the UK
===> Academics in the Middle East
-----------------------------
Special Topics
-----------------------------
=> Katrina, Rita, Wilma & Irene
=> Academic Libraries
=> School & College
Loading...
Copyright 2012. All Rights reserved
The Chronicle of Higher Education
1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037