|
Julie
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #78 on: October 27, 2005, 05:11:37 AM » |
|
I, too, hate the whining game, so I have changed my style of grading. It takes longer, but I get few, if any complaints, and students are generally responsive.
For essay exams: -I write a key before I grade. When I give back exams, I refer to the existence of the key as being a crucial part of my grading style. This does several things: first, it removes some of the subjectivity of the grading process, for both me and the students. Students complain about essay grading because they don't perceive it as an objective process (like a multiple choice exams).
-Next, in every essay I grade, in my comments I include a "ways to improve" section that provides constructive criticism. This way, they can interpret my approach as helping them become better throughout the class, not passing judgement on them. This seems a semantic difference, but it is effective.
-Finally, if they are still reticent, I tell them to go home and type up their essay exam answer and bring it in to discuss their grades. Students who are not interested will never take the time; those that are serious often come up later and say they are too embarrassed even to bring it in -- often shocked that I gave it as high a grade as I did. (Thanks to a colleague for this suggestion!)
For papers: -Very much the same process: a key, a "ways to improve" comment section; I also encourage students to read it out loud to themselves.
Overall, I find that student complaints are minimized with extensive comments during grading. I found that even at large schools with huge classes, my time was better spent in the commenting process rather than the time spent arguing during office hours. My evaluations are generally very good, and I think part of it is this commenting strategy.
|