More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND


Mr. Sciabarra grossly distorts Rand's views on Dualism:

"Mr. Sciabarra thinks that it helped her to look at ideas in a wider context, and to formulate her rejection of dualism in all its forms, from good versus evil to mind versus body."

Rand rejected the dualism of mind vs. body in favor of a unity of complements, not synthesis of opposites. She never rejected the dualism of good vs. evil - in fact she repeatedly and explicitly advocated their opposition. Where do you see in her writing a synthesis between Capitalism and Communism, Egoism and Altruism, knowledge and fantasy, or between Dagny Taggart and Lilian Rearden?

-- Michelle Fram Cohen, M.A. Comparative Literature, SUNY at Binghamton (posted 4/19, 10:15 a.m., E.D.T.)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments (required)

> STEP 3: Submit!

Check this box if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.
Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity.


Copyright © 1999 by The Chronicle of Higher Education