More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND


In Response to C. Smith. Your paradox arises from an unacknowledged, and false, assumption. It's a common error to ignore the creation of new resources once people employ their minds. New ways of extending shrinking resources, and even discovery and invention of alternative resources, takes place every day. As long as people are free to think, innovate, produce, and retain the value of their efforts, there are no "finite resources" to be consumed.

To confirm this with historical evidence, one can make comparisons of commodity prices for supposedly "finite" resources (such as gold, crude oil, etc.). If they were truly "finite", supply and demand would force the prices higher over the long term. However, they always fall. The falling prices cannot be explained by demand falling faster than supply, with population growth, demand tends to grow and force prices of a finite commodity higher. The reality is that the prices fall. The false assumption is that resources are finite.

-- L. Edgett, BSEE CSU (posted 10/19, 4:43 p.m., E.D.T.)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments (required)

> STEP 3: Submit!

Check this box if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.
Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity.


Copyright © 1999 by The Chronicle of Higher Education