More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND


I think Bobby Quine's error is that he thinks "self-evident" is the same as "tautological".

Counterexamples to this are of two kinds:

Tautological things that are not self-evident, and self-evident things that are not tautological. The former can easily be found: Just pick a tautology that is exeedingly complicated and whose proof is long. Many mathematical theorems will serve.

The other kind of counterexample is more interesting. "Existence exists" is one. The law of excluded middle is another. The existence of one's own consciousness is yet another. These are self-evident non-tautologies.

Where do they come from? At the risk of being repetitious, I think an interesting account of this can be found in Peikoff's paper "Aristotle's Intuitive Induction" in the 1985 volume of The New Scholasticism.

-- Michael Hardy, assistant professor, UNCP (posted 5/4, 5:30 p.m., E.D.T.)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments (required)

> STEP 3: Submit!

Check this box if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.
Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity.


Copyright © 1999 by The Chronicle of Higher Education