More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND


Bobby Quine says that existence is hardly self-evident. Hardly self-evident? To you maybe, but not to me. What can be more self-evident than existence? You do not prove that existence exists because it is the basis on which all proofs depend. To even ask the question "Does existence exist?" implies that you have accepted it in your attempt to deny or question it. Existence is an axiom on which all knowledge begins. Remember: There is: existence; something: identity; I am aware of: consciousness. These are the three basic axioms that Objectivism recognizes--upon which all knowledge is built and all proofs depend. Now what is so difficult to understand about that? Don't convolute and complicate the issue when it is easy to understand.

-- Thomas Belizarius, student of philosophy (posted 5/4, 10:45 a.m., E.D.T.)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments (required)

> STEP 3: Submit!

Check this box if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.
Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity.


Copyright © 1999 by The Chronicle of Higher Education