More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND

Whether traditional or online, extent of learner interaction with subject matter understandable to the learner, extent of learner interaction with subject matter expertise (professor, tutor, or other type of expertise), and extent to which such learner interaction can be both rapid and frequent as needed by the learner are key to learner success.

High values of these factors are generally not facilitated in the same ways in online and traditional learning. Interactivity in traditional learning is often in a classroom or a lab requiring physical presence at a particular time, or in a professor or tutor office requiring physical presence at a particular time. Interactivity in online learning is often through e-mail, e-file-transfer, audio and video conferencing, etc., as our interactivity in this colloquy is, not necessarily requiring physical presence at a particular time. We do not know which kind of interactivity is more effective and for which people or for which subject matter; perhaps because the kind is not of great importance generally.

Values of these factors are relatively high in some traditional learning and in some online learning, and less than high in some traditional or online learning.

Values of these factors should be very significant in traditional or online accreditation, in addition to values of the three factors mentioned in the Perley and Tanguay article. It is my experience that values of these factors, including the three factors mentioned in the Perley and Tanguay article, can be at least as high in online as in traditional learning, but not necessarily through use of the same methods, procedures, or professors in online as in traditional.

-- Cliff Layton, Director Online Services, Rogers State University (posted 10/29, 11:30 a.m., E.D.T.)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments

> STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

   


Copyright © 1999 by The Chronicle of Higher Education