|

|
|
Perhaps the real issue here is one of ownership. Who really "owns" history? In the United States, it seems to me that those who get the most publicity are those who historically win. Those in power have always disseminated massive amounts of alleged "facts" to a public made up of what we now might call information consumers; whether those facts prove to be accurate in the long run makes the difference between later judgments of accuracy and later condemnations of falsehood. We now look back to the work of "yellow journalists" published earlier in the century with respect and admiration, for their words helped cleanse industries and save lives. I would invite members of the Reagan Administration who are still with us to publicly correct the record if they are worried about the content of a book whose authorship they abetted in and apparently commissioned, wittingly or otherwise. Let the public decide whose stories and whose documents make more sense.
-
- -- Megan Greene, Scholar at Large/UT - Austin (posted 10/11, 4:35 p.m., E.D.T.)
JOIN THE DEBATE
|
Copyright © 1999 by The Chronicle of Higher Education
|