More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND

I thank Dan Fefferman for his straightforward answer to my criticism of his original comments.

For the record, although I'm in serious disagreement with the theology, the philosophy, and most of the politics ("personal" and otherwise) of virtually all of the "cults" and "cult"-like organizations in question, as a First Amendment absolutist I must support their right to exist on campus as long as we allow "mainstream" religious organizations to exist there as well.

I should hope we learned from the Branch Davidian debacle what can happen when people overreact to organizations that seem weird or sinister to outsiders.

That being said, I would also hope that our universities can do a sufficiently good job of imbuing our students with the intellectual rigor necessary to engage in analytical reasoning and rational problem-solving, so they don't need mysticism or superstition to help get them through the uncertainties and difficulties that will confront them in life.

Unfortunately, given the recent debacle concerning teaching evolution in public schools in Kansas, it seems as if our entire society has a long way to go in this regard.

-- David G. Whiteis, Indiana-Purdue University at Ft. Wayne (posted 8/24, 12:08 p.m., E.D.T.)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments

> STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

   


Copyright © 1999 by The Chronicle of Higher Education