More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND

As the bastion of independent, critical thinking and free speech, I find it unconscionable that universities find it necessary to censor unconventional ideas and beliefs offered by alternative religious groups. Since when is it the objective of academic institutions to protect legal adults from unpopular ideas? This kind of paternalism smacks of indoctrination uncharacteristic of the very principles taught in the classroom. Constitutional and ethical issues aside, the fear-mongering about so-called cults is unfounded. If one looks carefully at the proponents of control, one sees the orchestration of this effort by individuals aligned with the anticult movement carrying out a campaign of disinformation, unscientific allegations about new religions, and a frightening moral crusade to implement a particularistic moral vision of society that runs counter to cultural/religious pluralism and diversity. Anytime naysayers begin to warn us about "dangerous" ideas, we should be alert to the McCarthy-like implications. The campus should be the first place to recognize such scare tactics and the last place to endorse censorship.

-- Stuart A. Wright, Professor of Sociology, Lamar University (posted 8/20, 2:14 p.m., E.D.T.)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments

> STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

   


Copyright © 1999 by The Chronicle of Higher Education