More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND

While there is no question that there are great benefits to society when "broken windows" are tended to, that is not the issue that should concern criminal justice professionals. The only issue that matters in this debate is whether combating decay has a correlation with a drop in the crime rate. While the great spineless "blob" of police administrators would swear that fighting urban blight over the past decade has somehow reduced crime, there is little evidence to support this. In a booming economy, with shrinking populations of teenagers, street crime rates should wane regardless of policing methods employed. Police officials are laughably predictable in claiming credit for any drop in the crime rate, while pointing the finger at the economy and demographics for any rise in crime. The "flavor of the month" in policing for the past few years has been "aggressive policing," zero tolerance of those "broken windows." The Top Cops boast that thry are responsible for the crime drop. Really? In two years--when the recession is in full bloom--something tells me that words like "economy" and "demographics" will be all we hear from their lips--again.
-- Fred McQuiggan, Sgt., Philadelphia Police (posted 2/6, 9:35 a.m., U.S. Eastern time)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments

> STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

   


Copyright © 2001 by The Chronicle of Higher Education