More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND

An article in the new issue of The Chronicle explores how the tenure process is changing at many colleges. Most administrators say that their institutions are offering tenure to the same proportion of faculty members as they always have. But junior professors feel that the bar has been raised and that it is much more difficult to get tenure now. Many faculty members at colleges where people received tenure 20 years ago with minimal publication records report that they now must publish extensively to have a shot at tenure. Non-tenured professors also say that they must publish more quickly -- as they sometimes face early reviews (well before the official tenure review) that may determine their professional futures. Some scholars fear that these changes are having a negative effect on students and on scholarship. Research seems to be more valued than teaching, even at colleges that have considered themselves teaching institutions. And many faculty members feel that they must focus on work that can be published quickly, which may not necessarily be the most valuable work they could do. Is the bar for getting tenure getting too high? If so, what effect is that change having on scholarship and teaching? What should colleges and departments do about those trends?

For further information, see this background article:

> 25 RESPONSES (New 3/4)


JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments

> STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

   


Copyright © 2001 by The Chronicle of Higher Education