More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND

Having read the article, my initial reaction is one of shock, that UND would knowingly associate with a white Aryan supremacist, in 1988. In retrospect it is not surprising. Today, in 2000-1, UND not only names a building after Englstad, but allows him to dictate human rights policy concerning minority students here on campus. This follows a long pattern of demonstrated institutional racism here at UND, including:

--The perpetrators of the hate crime, (pointing a gun, toy or not, and shouting obscenities at a ethnic minority is terrorizing and a hate crime under federal statutes), as described in the article, was also reported in the campus newspaper (Dakota Student), went unpunished, yet six days later three Native Americans participating in a peaceful demonstration promoting human rights were arrested and prosecuted for disorderly conduct. This same group of individuals were fraternity members dressed as cowboys and Indians, with the cowboys chasing the Indians around campus, also terrorized another Native American woman and her grandchild.

--As official policy UND doesn't extend tuition deferment to individuals receiving tribal funding, (last semester I was unable to charge books on account and this semester my registration was canceled as a result of this policy).

--UND claims a zero-tolerance policy on discrimination and that taunting such as "Sioux Suck" and "Kill the Sioux" doesn't occur at sports events, yet it does. On February 2, 2001 my step daughter witnessed this ugliness as a member of a contingent of high school girls basketball players and culture club members that participated in a Native exhibition dance during half-time of the UND-NDSU game. She later asked me why they do that. The main argument of opponents of the "Fighting Sioux" name is the logo perpetuates a negative stereotype that dehumanizes all native people. The challenge facing the opponents of the "Fighting Sioux" logo is overcoming and reversing over seventy years of exposure to this misinformation, with education and legislation so that in the future no ethnic group will be subject to this humiliation.

-- Randy Black Cloud, City of Grand Forks-Water treatment operator, part-time student at the University of North Dakota (posted 3/1, 9:30 a.m., U.S. Eastern time)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments

> STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

   


Copyright © 2001 by The Chronicle of Higher Education