The Chronicle: Colloquy: Responses

Professor Ryan: In an earlier discussion we disputed positions. I suggested there, from the positions your took, and my knowledge of the weak writings on archaeological theory and practice of people in the discipline of philosophy, that academic philosophy was far from being what it should be. It is my custom, when I over-generalize, or am in error in other ways, to try to make amendment. Hence, this, in essence, is a thanks for your participation in the present discussion.

Much earlier I expressed my admiration for the abilities of Professor Moody, who is, like you, also in philosophy. I have gained a good deal from following his arguments. He and I hold quite different positions. You and I are not truly far apart, but are separated somewhat. Your summary statement of the central matters of concern in this discussion, I see as a truly notable contribution, as is your persistence in pushing the matter of strong and weak verification. Hence, you too, have my sincere thanks.

: -- Melburn D. Thurman, none (posted 2/13, 12:30 p.m., U.S. Eastern time)

previous response

next response

JOIN THE DEBATE

STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

STEP 2: Your comments

STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

APE-MEN
Our biological beastliness spawned our cultural greatness. But can our biological greatness save us from our cultural beastliness, asks David P. Barash, a professor of psychology at the University of Washington. (Password required; how to get one.)
(Illustration by Courtney Granner)