The Chronicle: Colloquy: Responses

In response to Melburn Thurman's question, "Are you arguing that it is impossible to distinguish science from religion, and both of these from magic?," I answer in the negative. I think, for example, that the question "Do photons have mass" is pretty obviously a scientific question, and "Does God answer prayers" is a religious one. But there are also questions that seem to span both domains, such as "What is ultimately real?"

Incidentally, I take the proposition "God answers prayers" to be an example of something that is not strongly falsifiable, but is weakly falsified.

: -- Todd Moody, assoc. prof. of philosophy (posted 2/12, 10:00 a.m., U.S. Eastern time)

previous response

next response

JOIN THE DEBATE

STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

STEP 2: Your comments

STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

APE-MEN
Our biological beastliness spawned our cultural greatness. But can our biological greatness save us from our cultural beastliness, asks David P. Barash, a professor of psychology at the University of Washington. (Password required; how to get one.)
(Illustration by Courtney Granner)