More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND

An essay in the new issue of The Chronicle says that an important failing in libraries today is that librarians don't know enough about why people read and what they like to read. Wayne A. Wiegand, a professor at the School of Library and Information Studies at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, writes that librarians "lack a deeper understanding of how libraries already serve readers, and they miss evidence that they could use to convince state legislatures and other sources of financial support that spending money on stories is important." Mr. Wiegand writes that this failure is needless -- given all the available research about why people read. Some of the blame for this "tremendous professional oversight," he writes, belongs to library schools, which have "generally ignored" the research. He says the schools focus almost exclusively on how to give library users "access to useful knowledge," rather than to the stories they want. Is Mr. Wiegand's critique of librarians and library schools correct? Are library schools failing to teach future librarians what they should know about what and why people read? Do library schools stress information at the expense of stories?

For further information, see this background article:

> 34 RESPONSES (New 12/13)


JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments

> STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

   


Copyright © 2000 by The Chronicle of Higher Education