More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND

People who care about the future should be very concerned about Peter Singer.

I base this on a reading of the book he wrote with Helga Kuhse, Should the Baby Live: The Problem (sic) of Handicapped Infants. If the ideas weren't so attractive to those who can't or won't think critically, I'd recommend the book for people who don't like suspense.

In the book, Singer and Kuhnse attempt to refute the "slippery slope" analogy by giving the example of a skier who can turn and stop at will. Of course the Nazi example, which Singer doesn't like, wasn't like that, nor are the governments or medical professions of the United States, Australia, or any human creation. We know that in the country where physicians induce death most frequently, the Netherlands, doctors repeatedly breach "safeguards." (A study in the Journal of Medical Ethics suggested that "voluntary" euthanasia wasn't voluntary not 2, or 10, but 20% of the time).

I'd like to believe that we could rely on the "marketplace of ideas" in international governmental and academic discussions. But for the marketplace to stand a chance, people with disabilities would need to be proportionally represented. We aren't, and a consequence is that our lives are undervalued by Singer and others who venture onto the slippery slope of compromise in the interest of the "greater good."

-- Art Blaser, Associate Professor of Political Science, Chapman University (posted 3/23, 1:35 p.m., E.S.T.)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments

> STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

   


Copyright © 2000 by The Chronicle of Higher Education