More options | Back issues
Home
News
Opinion & Forums
Careers
Sponsored Information & Solutions
Campus Viewpoints
Services
The Chronicle of Higher Education: Colloquy

COLLOQUY
THE QUESTION
RESPONSES
BACKGROUND

Singer's simplistic brand of utilitarianism is not only intellectually suspect, but a direct assault on the whole notion of human rights. As the preamble to the United Nations, universal declaration of human rights (1948) declares, "[R]ecognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world."

Human beings are special precisely because they are human. In a cynical time such as ours, this statement may seem circular, but it is one of the truths that the Declaration of Independence concluded was "self-evident" when it stated that all men are created equal and endowed with the right to life. As Albert Schweitzer once warned, "Whenever there is lost the consciousness that every man is an object of concern for us just because he is a man, civilization and morals are shaken and the advance to fully developed inhumanity is only a matter of time." Those inclined to join with Singer and rationalize the destruction of the innocent in the name of "the greater good" seem oblivious of the fact that that same rationale figured prominently in the atrocities perpetrated by the Nazis in Germany and the Communists in the Soviet Union and China. Have they considered the question put to Scrooge in A Christmas Carol? "Will you decide what men shall live and what men shall die? It may be that in the site of Heaven, you are more worthless and less fit to live than millions like this poor man's child. Oh God! To hear the Insect on the leaf pronouncing on the too much life among his hungry brothers in the dust."

-- James Bohan, Author, The House of Atreus: Abortion as a Human Rights Issue (posted 3/13, 10:40 a.m., E.S.T.)
< previous response
next response >

JOIN THE DEBATE

> STEP 1: Your contact information (required)

Your name:

Your title & institution:

Your phone:

Your e-mail address:

> STEP 2: Your comments

> STEP 3: Submit!

Be sure to include your name and affiliation. Legitimate requests for anonymity will be honored.

The Chronicle maintains Colloquy as an open forum where readers can comment on issues. Submissions may be condensed or edited for clarity, but editing is kept to a minimum. We correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc. In addition, we remove statements that have the potential to be libelous or to slander someone. In cases in which people make claims that could be libelous, we will remove the names of institutions and departments. But in those cases, we will not alter the ideas contained in the submissions.

Please read our privacy policy or our Colloquy help page if you have questions.

Check this box only if you would like this submission to be considered for publication as a letter to the editor in the printed Chronicle.

   


Copyright © 2000 by The Chronicle of Higher Education