• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

U.S. and Australia Compete for Coveted Partnerships With Chinese Higher Education

May 19, 2011, 10:19 am

Sydney, Australia—Australian academics are anxiously eying what they see as rising U.S. interest in China. They talk of hearing American accents in Beijing, and they have noticed a real dip in Chinese students at home. They attribute some of that decrease to competition from the United States.

The number of new Chinese students at Australian postsecondary institutions this year is down 15 to 25 percent, says Anthony Pollock, the chief executive of IDP Education, a student-recruitment company. (The most recent U.S. numbers show Chinese students up more than 50 percent.) But from my observations here, admittedly anecdotal, the Australians are well ahead of Americans in building connections to China. Those connections are at a variety of levels: cooperative research, institutional partnerships, and platforms for student and faculty exchange.

First, some important background: Australia was one of the first Western countries to establish diplomatic relations with China in the 1970s, as the Cultural Revolution drew to a close. Now China is Australia’s top trading partner, thanks to China’s appetite for coal, iron, and natural gas. Australia is a day’s plane ride from China, compared to the two days of travel time from the eastern United States. Overlapping time zones between Australia and China make it easier for university partners in the two countries to do business than U.S.-China partners.

Although geographical proximity does not guarantee intellectual links, I have the sense that many Australians get off the plane and go straight to work in China. American academic administrators sometimes seem to still be scanning the Chinese academic environment when they arrive in Beijing or Shanghai. It’s important to avoid stereotypes of course: Mandarin-speaking Australians have committed gaffes in China, and some American institutions—Yale and Johns Hopkins come to mind—have long-standing and deep Chinese relationships.

Still, in the institutions that I have visited in Australia, administrators rattle off impressive lists of activities in China and talk of recent or forthcoming trips. In October, Australia’s “Group of Eight,” eight of the top Australian universities, signed an agreement with the Chinese universities known as the “China Nine,” including such brand names as Fudan, Peking, and Tsinghua universities, and the “Hong Kong Three” (University of Hong Kong, Chinese University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology). Initially the agreement is centered on student exchange, but should blossom into faculty exchanges and joint degrees, says Jennie Lang, pro-vice-chancellor for international at the University of New South Wales, a Group of Eight member. “Suddenly we have access to a couple of hundred student places,” says Ms. Lang.

There is also plenty of action outside of the Group of Eight. When I talked to Steven Schwartz, the vice chancellor of Macquarie University, earlier this week, he was essentially just off the plane from a trip with the prime minister to Beijing. The voice of Ian O’Connor, the vice chancellor of Griffith University, swelled with enthusiasm in an interview as he mentioned the eagerness of Chinese academics to go straight to work on making partnerships productive. His description of Chinese attitudes reminded me of the Nike “Just do it” advertising campaign. In April, Griffith celebrated the official start to a China-supported Confucius Institute, not that unusual an achievement, but this one will be centered on tourism, believed to be one of a kind.

This week, Simon Evans, pro-vice-chancellor for international at the University of Melbourne, and colleagues, are headed off on a four-city, 13-university tour to seek out Melbourne alumni living in China and to talk with institutions where Melbourne has research-led relationships. Mr. Evans estimates that 100 Melbourne scholars are doing research in or on China. “The international element of the university is not built around student recruiting,” said Mr. Evans. “It is built around everything that we do.”

Ultimately, of course, it is difficult to measure Chinese connections when you are not in China. At the Universitas 21 meeting that I am attending here, I sought out Wu Zhipan, an executive vice president for Peking University. Our conversation circled back to students. He told me that with China’s one-child policy, Chinese parents pay great attention to the safety of their children. Australia is still viewed as a comparatively safe study destination, he says. But when it comes to working toward a doctorate, he said, U.S. laboratories and equipment are often viewed as the best.

This entry was posted in International. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • davidmilstone

    Great article Eric – we in higher education need to keep in mind our raison d’etre – and Odalis’ story is a great one!  Thanks!

  • mtc1840

    Outstanding article, outstanding achievements by this young man.  May he continue to succeed.

  • socafish

     I am sure someone in Texas or Arizona is working on a methodology to assure this doesn’t happen again.

  • jlpeducation

    love this. if only we had the time or resources to give every student like this a chance.

  • cosdean

    This is a great program.  I’ve been a donor to the program since it’s beginning and I am thrilled that it has been so succesful and made such a profound impact on these students lives.  Best money I ever spent.  

  • 1021ajr

    This sounds like a wonderful program and I really enjoyed the article.  Northeastern used to be far more committed, however, to supporting the needs of working class students, particularly those from Boston and surrounding towns, than it is now.  While the Torch Program is laudable, I wonder how many more students could have benefited from an NU education had the institution not followed an enrollment management and marketing strategy to aggressively reposition itself to become another Boston U/US News Top 100.

  • darccity

    What a feel good story! But the only aspect that wasn’t correct is the author’s conclusion in the title: “Why Odalis Polanco’s SAT Score Didn’t Matter.”  The Northeastern program was great for English as a Second Language applicants, especially immigrants, because the SAT (even the Math word problems) discriminates against such applicants. However, that does NOT justify doing away with SAT exams for everyone else. The SAT was designed to reduce the preferences toward high income families built into the application process. Optional SATs is even worse because it makes SAT medians skewed high (those with lower scores won’t take the exam).

  • erichoover

    darccity — I wrote this headline to emphasize the fact that, for this one student, a low SAT score was neither a barrier nor an indication of his (lack of) potential. That’s all.

    Eric Hoover

  • SophieMerry

    Good for Mr. Polanco! 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6SD3KL55NEZ5SGE4GV7XIRHUEE Tom

    Back in the day when most Northeastern students were (white) working class students, there was no UMASS Boston nor were there any community colleges.  For the late blooming student who does not come from a disadvantaged background, those schools now offer an affordable
    alternative.

  • kherndon

    A must-read for any academic professional–thanks for the positive article, Eric. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/Northeastern.University.Sustainability Carol Rosskam

    I’ve met Odalis on a number of occassions the past several months. He’s super enthusiastic and can articulate the importance of sustainability - and its relationship with business – better than most students can, even upon their graduation. Odalis will be a fantastic addition to any organization for which he works, and he’s a shining example of a Torch bearer success! 

  • kathleenchgriffin

    As a first-generation-in-my-family Irish American FT evening college student of 30, I had no SAT angst.  I simply enrolled!  But as someone who automatically aces every standardized test (e.g., 98% percentile on GRE), I think Northeastern is wise to have several means of assessing student potential.   Some students are not good at tests, but flower in other settings. 

  • richardtaborgreene

     Chinese, especially the children of the coastal elite, are very brand conscious, much as Japanese were some time ago.   Universities, globally viewed, have prominent brands and much of what a student BUYS at university is the brand that goes with it.   China is filled with several generations used to prodigious amounts of effort and work and when released into Australian and US universities, much gets done, especially in the US as the US’ culture is so welcoming and respecting of……Effort.   China is Effort, the USA loves Effort—a marriage made in history if not heaven.  

    Give credit to Australia for being Open Seriously to Asia after decades of closure and be mindful of important intellectual areas—design comes to mind—where Australia academia is decades ahead of US universities in funding, publishing, research, collaborations, globality, technique, and theory.   

    As is so often the case, students face a choice of Brand with real dangers and high costs, versus real worth with safety and great Australian enjoyments of life.   Both have their virtues and distinct costs—so you gain either way or lose either way.   China will be producing tens of millions willing and able to make this choice in coming years.   

    I am glad this is happening.  In addition, China’s leaders are actually now inventing new forms of higher education, unthought of in the West, that will give the West, even the US’ best, a run for their money—–lovely, about time, what’s that in the ear……………………..the sound………………………………………the sound……………………………….of the creaks…………………………of history turning!

  • burger1376

    After I graduated from a top Chinese university, I found that the only ”inventing” going on in the higher education of that nation is in cheating.  Chinese students never go to class, copy papers off the internet, and even sometimes pay to have their papers written by other, more hard working students.  I am not sure what  ”inventing of new forms of higher education” you are talking about.  Have you actually stepped foot in a Chinese university?  The international students at my university (American, Russian, Korean, European, etc) were the only ones writing their own papers, attending classes, and discussing the topics after class.  The chinese students spent most of their time playing video games or Majiang. 

    With that being said, it would be wise for both the US and Australia to be careful where they do their cooperation and where they recruit students from.  There are, or course, many high quality students within China.  But, you can’t be blinded by fake Chinese statistics; you have to realize that the majority of Chinese students are not what they are hyped up to be.   There is no “history turning” going on in higher education, especially involving China.  And, as we have seen with campuses like Johns Hopkins University-Nanjing University cooperation, we find that the quality of Johns Hopkins has to lower itself to the standards and lack of academic freedom of the host nation. 

    Therefore, in response to the article, I believe that American Universities are learning their lessons.  They are going to China continuously seeking out the best cooperation, while Australia seems to be seeking out any cooperation regardless of the results. Australia seems to be easily fooled by the Chinese idea of “face.”   

  • richardtaborgreene

    China is a very big nation and maybe no one at all knows all that goes on in higher education innovation there right now—there are things you apparently did not see and it would see more…………learningful…………………open-ishy……………………to ask me what I saw where rather than without effort assume your limited exposure represented the total of that big nation.   What I am talking about will be unavoidable in about 18 months so take a look at the NYTimes around end of 2012.    Over generalizing from limited personal exposure is NOT a great tool for career building in general.   I have struggled to overcome it all my life without putting it to rest.    

  • manoflamancha

     Australia is still recovering from the anti-asia bent after the World War II, and the immigration policy was based upon perceptions of the Yellow Peril. In fact, in a memorable speech in parliament given by a future prime minister regarding opening up immigration from the east relative to the UK, he was said to have intoned: “But gentlemen, two Wongs don’t make a White!”. So, there is the modern tendency by the intellegentia down under to give unspoken respect to the Chinese, but one wonders if the working classes will put up with the invasion of Asian students. There have been reports of violence against Pakistani and Indian students, especially around Sydney. The Chinese may give pause to injecting too many students at once. University folk down under have little communication with the true dinky di aussie working man, so there is really no agreement between the two groups respecting the issue of asian immigration, legal or not.

  • http://twitter.com/CHERHK Higher Ed HKU

    Competition for influence and reputation-driven partnerships in China will certainly increase over the next decade.

  • gavin_moodie

    Australia was anti Asian since the anti Chinese riots on the Victorian gold fields in the 1850s which was soon followed by Victorian legislation severely limiting Chinese immigration and the federal Parliament’s Immigration Restriction Act 1901 which legislated the ‘White Australia policy’.  

    Australian academics are well aware of the resistance to high immigration since it was a major theme of the federal election in August last year.  Nonetheless, there is broadly bipartisan support to increase immigration again to provide labour for the 2nd phase of the mining boom.  

  • old nassau’67

    Every Division I Athletic Department has a similar program, called “Recruiting”, which provides student-athletes with tutoring, training, and one-on-one mentoring – to keep them eligible. Also, dedicated dorms, cafeterias, and work-out areas. These students’ SAT’s (and GPA’s) are usually “well below the university’s median mark”.
    These recruits, too, are invited for a rigorous visit, meeting with coaches and varsity athletes, also cheerleaders and pep squads, to display their abilities – vertical jump, 40-yd. sprint, etc. They, too, receive full scholarships. And hope to land a job in the pro’s.
    The difference, as noted in a CHE article only yesterday, “NCAA Penalizes 103 Teams for Missing Academic-Progress Mark”.