• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

Textbook Publisher Announces ‘App’ Approach to Learning Materials

March 2, 2011, 10:00 am

Long Beach—The phrase “there’s an app for that” may be coming to textbooks.

Today a major textbook company, Cengage Learning, announced a new e-textbook publishing platform that lets professors plug in apps, some made by other software companies, to add to traditional textbook content features like tutoring services or the ability to trade margin notes with other students.

The system is called MindTap, and it is scheduled to be announced at the annual TED conference here. When Chris Vento, Cengage’s executive vice president for technology and development, explained the system to a reporter, he felt the need to put the word “textbook” in air quotes, since traditional textbook content is a small part of the new product. These digital textbooks essentially bundle together several products sold by Cengage and its subsidiaries, including their electronic test-bank system, called Aplia, as well as videos and other materials that the company owns the rights to, including the archives of Newsweek.  And MindTap allows professors to customize the presentation of the material, by adding their own slides, video lectures, articles, or free online content from elsewhere.

The wider implications of this view–the textbook as a small part of a learning experience that’s now focused on related interactive software–were spelled out for publishing as a whole last week by William D. Rieders, executive vice president for new media at the company, in an interview with The Chronicle.

Competing textbook publishers already offer similar bundles of learning materials, but what appears unique is that Cengage officials are working with third-party e-learning companies to let them build add-ons that can be added directly into the e-textbooks. In that way, the system might work something like Apple’s popular online store for apps that work on its smartphones or tablet computers.

Students will read the online textbooks via a standard Web browser, though Mr. Vento says the Web pages are coded so that they adapt to fit whatever device the student is using, whether it is a laptop, iPad, or a smartphone. The system’s interface consists of two side-by-side windows, one displaying a page of a textbook and the other allowing users to open another app within the system, such as a notebook page to type and share notes, or any of the other apps that a professor enabled for his or her course.

In some ways, the Cengage system appears to be competing with course-management systems like Blackboard, which have also added features and customization so that professors can bring together learning materials and services in one interface. Mr. Vento said his company was not trying to compete with course-management providers, however, noting that professors will still want to use a course-management system for things like managing enrollment and submitting grades.

The move is the latest in a growing platform war among textbook publishers, as traditional textbook companies seek to define what a textbook should be in the digital age and possibly even control the online storefront for textbook publishing.

Cengage officials said that nine colleges and universities are testing MindTap, though it declined to name them. It plans to make it more widely available for sale starting in June.

This entry was posted in Teaching. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • extra88

    I haven’t encountered Cengage’s other products but Aplia is not accessible, at all. All the questions are in Flash (without Flash’s accessibility features) so I don’t see how that part of the bundle is going to work on an iPad or other devices without Flash.

  • qaimarin

    Great comment/question, extra88. Actually, all Flash assets are being rebuilt in HTML5 to support multi-device access.

    Best,

    Nader Qaimari (Nader.Qaimari@cengage.com)
    Senior Vice President, Marketing
    Cengage Learning

  • daveapostles

    Blame Apple. Wintek, Foxconn, now refusing GPLed apps on the Apple appstore – complete charlatans.

  • windfix

    Textbook publishers certainly seem desperate to find a way to stay relevant. More useless electronic add-ons aren’t the way.

  • http://twitter.com/thinkwell thinkwell

    I like what we’ve done with our curriculum. Currently, we have two apps out: Biology and Calculus. Both make the entire courseworth’s of video lectures accessible on your iphone and in the case of the Calculus app, your iPad. You can easily search for the topic you need help on and it’s easy to create a library of lectures on your app.

    I think this extended textbook app idea sounds really cool. I like that you would be able to add content from other providers and just basically build your own course from a variety of resources. I see really strong homeschool applications with this and teaches customizing students courses to help them where they need it. This also becomes a true living textbook, which is really attractive with how quickly things change in our world.

  • lotsoquestions

    Those of you think these apps are a waste of time and money have obviously never taught an online course. The idea of a stats book that might come with a five minute video clip explaining a particular statistical procedure, the idea of a history book that comes preloaded with some clips from news reports made during World War Two, or a language textbook that comes with audio and video clips of conversations, news reports,etc. in the language? Priceless.
    Any professor who’s ever been asked to create an online course will tell you that it’s possible to waste hours and days finding these clips elsewhere, loading them onto a course platform, and then having to recheck the links every semester only to find out that they no longer work. (I like to create assignments that say: Watch this five minute video clip and then relate it to what we’re talking about in this chapter about ethnic stereotypes, nationalism, etc. It keeps students more engaged.)

    I routinely tell publishers that I won’t even consider a textbook that doesn’t have a website loaded with these types of materials, either specially prepared or gathered from elsewhere and kept up to date and functioning. For what we pay for textbooks, this is just common sense that such features should be offered.

  • http://jupiterjs.com Justin Meyer

    It’s an HTML5 app.

  • ClassroomAidInc

    Textbook as well as publishing should not be “boxed” in the “book” form, who can provide more seamless, human and touching learning experience with cost-effective way will win.

  • R117532

    Again, your assertion, ” ‘The facts of the story are simple, and should be familiar to *any* student of the for-profit education industry. . .  ’ ” is proven false. 

    Anyone so intellectually sloppy and/or lazy about such a simple point should not be accorded credibility in matters as complex as this. 

    From time to time, we all misspeak or overstate a claim but such excesses are your stock in trade, your dominate style. Let’s just let the readers decide. I believe I already know what you think.

  • fortysomethingprof

    “And Reinhardt is starting a football team…”

    Give them beer and circuses.

  • raymond_j_ritchie

    Yes – the article was going along OK until the bright idea of the football team came up.  Consider yourself bloody lucky if you do not have one.