• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

Private-Equity Firm to Buy Blackboard for $1.64-Billion

July 1, 2011, 2:48 pm

Blackboard Inc., maker of the popular college course-management software, announced on Friday that it had agreed to a $1.64-billion buyout by a private-equity firm, Providence Equity Partners.

The announcement came after the company said in April that it had received offers, setting off fevered speculation about the identity of its suitors. Blackboard plans to close the deal in the last quarter of this year.

The buyout is a big change in direction for one of higher education’s most prominent vendors, which had faced mounting pressure to both produce quarterly profits and shore up a declining market share for course-management software against an increasingly well-financed field of competitors.

After going public in 2004, Blackboard has grown steadily in size, buying two major competitors, Angel Learning and WebCT, and expanding into new markets, including analytics, mobile software, and emergency messaging. But the company seemed to strain at times in its attempt to meet the growth expectations of investors while focusing on the education market, which is often slow to make new investments.

Ray Henderson, president of Blackboard Learn, predicted in an interview with The Chronicle on Friday that going private will help the company bring back market share, although he argued that concerns about its hold on the market have been overstated. Now the company will not have to manage the perceptions of the few dozen institutional investors, which will give the company additional flexibility to serve its clients, he said.

The move will also help the company become more agile and to invest for long-term growth, Mr. Henderson said. As a public company, “there’s a lot of buzz that you don’t control,” Mr. Henderson said. “Just the basic stealth of being able to conduct business outside of the limelight is important.”

Blackboard took pains to tell its clients how little would change. The buyout would cause “no change in our relationship,” the company said in a statement, and Mr. Henderson wrote in a blog post that the pricing of its products would “remain within historical norms for the foreseeable future.”

Independent observers generally agreed that major, immediate changes for college customers of Blackboard were unlikely. Private-equity firms like Providence, which owns stakes in several other major education companies, are interested in “predictable streams of cash,” said Trace Urdan, an analyst at Signal Hill.

“There’s no need for them to make a really big, significant change to it,” Mr. Urdan said. “It’s not broken, it’s probably just not a growth stock anymore.”

Mr. Henderson said access to private capital will ensure that Blackboard will be able to put money into product development or big acquisitions. But in the wake of the announcement, observers said Blackboard still faces challenges in convincing its customers that it will continue to invest in all of its products. Providence could elect to pull Blackboard back from markets outside the core of its business, such as international education or research-and-development spending, Mr. Urdan said.

Blackboard could face a difficult patch while it manages the concerns of its clients during the transition period, said Vicki Tambellini, president of the Tambellini Group, a higher-education consulting firm. “For a time, this is not going to give institutions confidence,” Ms. Tambinelli said. “I think this will create doubt in terms of what it means to the institutions going forward.”

However, Mr. Henderson played down the possibility that Blackboard might scale back in some areas, although he said the company had not yet discussed those issues in detail with Providence. The key question is not where Blackboard will pare back, he said, but “where do we decide to lay down additional markers?”

“What do we decide that we’re going to really put our shoulder to?” he added.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://www.samplereality.com Mark Sample

    I’m shifting to more creative assignments like this in my non-composition classes. And it’d be a perfect assignment for my classes on graphic novels and narrative.

    I’m curious about the evaluation aspect of this assignment. I’m feeling my way toward a fair and useful way to evaluate student assignments that focus on what I call “creative analysis,” but I’d love to hear what approach you or others have taken for grading creative assignments.

  • studentperspective

     I’m so delighted my campus already made the switch away from Blackboard to Moodle.

  • Prof_truthteller

    It will be interesting to see what impact a multi-national investment firm, with holdings in both content and delivery technology in telco, media, and entertainment, will have on a company like BB, especially when able to operate “under the radar” of public scrutiny. Let’s see, not only can they not report to the media what they are doing, but hey! they OWN the media.

  • 11122741

    it is going to be interesting to see if online learning collapses over the next decade the way programmed instruction did in the 1960′s after billions were spent on it and the hype wore off
    and the realities set in.

  • graymondbrown

    It would be a great benefit to STEM education if Blackboard (or one of its competitors) would integrate Mathematica (or another capable CAS software) with their product.  The current difficulty in attaining decent electronic mathematical discourse between students and instructors is a large and unnecessary obstacle.

  • amnirov

    This is going to suck. Private equity firms = satan.

  • Guest

    lol! I actually gave up on all of them and simply use a blog and my private website, plus the listserv. It works.

  • cust0s

    As one who teaches both face-to-face and online, I would argue that the investment was well made.  The only collapse I could see would the impact on private schools who utilize online learning and fail to meet the requirements of newly proposed congressional legislation (e.g. gainful employment rule, etc.).  There was no way any investors could have seen this coming.  Most students in the online environment have been just as diligent though the major difference seems to be that they love and “need” the convenience of learning off campus just to maintain their employment, family connections, etc.  So, again, seemed like a good investment but the new legislation complicates things UNLESS you are a public school (e.g. tax payers are now the investors, right?).  Not so fair if you ask me.  Just my 2 cents.

  • cust0s

    Hey Gray,

    Why not Salmon Khan?  Remember his http://www.khanacademy.org/? He accomplished this so well…  or so I thought… and he made it free to everyone.

  • CanAmSteve

    I’d say they are fishin’ with dynamite. Everyone thinks there is some pot of gold in e-learning but no one has found it, so buying up any company with even a hint of success gives Big Money a place to put their dollars to work with some hope of future reward.

    For the most part, e-learning has been evolutionary rather than revolutionary. You still see “e-learning” programs running on the accepted “academic year” and simply mimicking F2F instruction but “with computers!”

    The corporate world, OTOH, sees shortcuts and money savings, so can be hoodwinked by LMS sellers into seeing ROI that may never materialize.

    LMS and course-management software should be standardized and it should be free. Service providers can make a living developing and supporting the framework, but IMO proprietary solutions are a waste of time and money.

  • mdefusco

    When will education see that the four mainstays of growth in any field are ideas, people, government and capital (in that order)?  Education is the second largest industry in the US (valued at over $1 trillion each year – behind only healthcare) with  no really organized access to capital.  Blackboard, whose growth was once spurred by its access to public markets, now decided that the oligopoly of several large institutional investors disabled them and decided on more orderly capital.   The results will be another chance to challenge assumptions and to assume a board that will insist on growth (not necessarily quarter to quarter).   This is a wonderful sign of a growing industry that has capital options.   We didn’t have similar negative reactions when Providence made a similar buyout several years ago of EDMC (now back publicly traded)  or when Goldman invested in Laureate.   We should applaud when risk capital wants to reinvorgorate firms that get stymied by their own success. (Peter Drucker once commented that the one way to insure a firm’s failure was to have 5 years of uninterrupted success).  That’s how industries stay vibrant.  Ask  General Motors.

  • czander

    Will the cost for using Blackboard increase? Given the track record of these buy-outs boys, of course the cost will increase. Consumers beware whenever the investment firms get into something the consumer suffers. Just look at what these guys are doing to the price of food.

  • CanAmSteve

    No direct argument – as long as you consider education just another place to make a buck. If e-learning is analogous to – say – the invention of moveable type in its importance to dissemination of knowledge, then we could be talking about who makes the best printing press.

    Or not. While I can take my content and shop it to any number of service providers who will compete to offer me the best product, the current e-learning market is based on technological dead-ending customers (and Blackboard’s history is a prime example).

  • mdefusco

    Part of free enterprise is the payment for risks taken.   When “buy-out boys” invest in companies that have reached their maturity and hope to take it to new heights, they deserve to be paid for taking the risk.  As far as the cost of food, it was not long ago that people spent there entire lives (and those of their families) feeding themselves.   Thank goodness that we have gotten to a point where not everyone is required to feed ourselves and we can focus on developing other ventures because we are more productive.    Or perhaps we go back to the good old days when everyone farms.  Can we count you in for your 40 acres czander?

  • etjatm

    This ought to make response to support requests soooo much better. lol.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=13756380 Cole Spolaric

    I can’t believe anyone would spend nearly 2 billion dollars on such a piece of crap!!!!

  • manitoga

    Don’t forget that Bb has intellectual property for Prometheus, Angel Learning, WebCT, Xythos, SafeAssign, Eluminate and WIMBA, in addition to it’s Learn platform.

  • johnakline

    I’m laughing at Cole’s post. And I agree. That quality would never be accepted for a commercial product. And it all just feels old  -as if web 2.0 didn’t happen. Which is why we keep seeing new and better LMSs popping up. Let’s hope that the competition will motivate Bb to improve. I think the new structure afforded by this purchase will allow Bb to be more innovative, improve its products and serve the academic market better. Or not – but then that is the nature of competition.

  • richardtaborgreene

    those greedy psychopaths Harvard Business School graduates screw up again—-their inablility to feel causes constant errors of theft and judgment—-all that eliteness, all those clever econ cover stories for theft, all that psychopathology hidden by elegant ideas from greed-inducing faculty, and to think the REST OF ACADEMIA WORSHIP THEM AS THEIR OWN ELITE—-yuk yuk yuk

    this private equity will soon be private iniquity.