• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

New Director of MIT Media Lab Talks of Encouraging Openness

April 27, 2011, 6:37 pm

Joi ItoThis week the Massachusetts Institute of Technology named a new director for its high-tech Media Lab, and its choice, Joi Ito, is someone who says he has learned more from World of Warcraft than from traditional academic institutions. Mr. Ito is chairman and former chief executive of Creative Commons, a nonprofit that advocates for new, more-open copyright licenses that make online sharing easier. He has also been a high-tech entrepreneur and a venture capitalist. Though he briefly attended Tufts University and the University of Chicago, he never completed a college degree. Mr. Ito talked to The Chronicle about his hopes for the new job and about how video games have prepared him to lead professors.

Q. You’ve led information-sharing efforts—most recently as head of Creative Commons. Do you anticipate more sharing coming out of the Media Lab on your watch? Will we see more open-source or open-knowledge projects from the Media Lab itself?
A. That will definitely be a bias I have going in. I think being director of the Media Lab, I don’t have the illusion that I can order people around. I can encourage people, create processes, and kind of set the tone of the conversation. But the great thing about the Media Lab is that everyone’s allowed to do what they want to do, and so I will definitely encourage openness. I will encourage more use of social media and Internet tools. And I will encourage communication in different modes that the Media Lab hasn’t traditionally used as much.

Q. I’ve seen you quoted about your love of playing World of Warcraft, the multiplayer video game, and how it has taught you to be a better leader. How has online gaming prepared you for this job at the Media Lab?
A.
What’s interesting about a World of Warcraft guild is that you’ve got a group of people who are showing up and actually paying money to play this game, and as a leader of a guild, you’re trying to encourage a bunch of people to do a bunch of administrative work, come up with guild bylaws, and cooperate. And this is similar with volunteers at Creative Commons and open-source projects. It’s trying to lead a bunch of people who are just there because they want to be. It’s a very different kind of management than say managing a bank or an investment bank, where you’ve got sticks and carrots and structure. The leadership method of online communities and World of Warcraft and open-source projects is actually really similar to doing something like leading a bunch of super-smart, creative academics and students.

Q. Do you worry that because you don’t have a college degree coming into a job like this, that you might not be taken seriously by some people in academe?
A.
While I don’t have a college degree, I do spend a great deal of my time with academics. I really do sincerely believe that I can have a positive impact on academics and academia in general. There will be some academics who might not take me as seriously or might have a problem with the idea, but I do think I’ll be able to contribute. I’m cautiously optimistic.

Q. What was it that turned you off in your undergraduate experiences?
A.
My problem was I could get on the Internet and learn most of the stuff that I needed to learn. What I wanted from academia was coaching, was excitement, was projects. And the undergraduate programs I attended didn’t have that. They were trying to teach me stuff, instead of coaching me along my path. And that’s the kind of people that the Media Lab attracts.

The problem is that the Media Lab is only one institution, and so I’d love the Media Lab to invent a way to take what we’re learning about learning and be able to allow other people to replicate it.

Q. The Media Lab tried replicate it with offshoots in other countries, but they didn’t take off. Why do you think that is?
A.
Part of it is when you’re working in expensive sciences, you need a lot of money—when you’re building robots, when you’re poking brains. The thing that’s interesting about the Internet and about software is that the cost of failure is really low. And so the key is going to be to take the Media Lab’s DNA and put it in institutions that don’t cost as much money to start, and maybe in fields that don’t cost as much money to start, and just kind of get the method. It’s my mission to try to help figure it out at the Media Lab and how it’s going to be able to scale across the world.

Q. What’s most exciting to you about taking this job?
A.
It wasn’t until I visited that I really fell in love with the idea. When I understood what the lab really was—sitting down with faculty and students and having these streams of conversations that crossed disciplines. The word “interdisciplinary” doesn’t really do the Media Lab justice. There are a lot of interdisciplinary programs that really kind of build bridges between distinct disciplines, but the Media Lab is really a synthesis that allows and actually encourages people to break traditional academic frameworks and think about science’s view of art, say, or think about art from a mathematical perspective. I think the problem is we don’t really have a good word for it. And that should be one of my first projects is to try to explain that.

Q. What would be a good word for it?
A.
I can describe the elements and maybe you can help me think of the word. A lot of it has to do with the lab’s layout, and the fact that there’s only one of each category of academic there. You’re forced to explain what you’re doing in other people’s terms. And it’s also very spontaneous, and it embraces serendipity because it’s not planned as much as, say, if you have a multiyear project to bring this department closer to this department.

Q. It’s kind of a mashup?
A
. Yeah, it’s kind of a mashup. A lot of people call America a melting pot of cultures. I don’t actually think it is. I think of America as a tossed salad. You’ve got kind of this dressing that tastes the same but actually you’ve got very distinct cultures. I think Japan actually is more of a melting pot in some ways because you’ve got these cultures that have been there for so long that they kind of mash into one. I think the Media Lab is somewhere in between. Interdisciplinary is different kinds of food on the same plate, and then once you get to the Media Lab you’re going from a tossed salad toward a stew, and I think it’s fundamentally different because you get a very different chemical reaction when you sort of melt the stuff together.

Q. You mean getting professors to mix those disciplines together and really talk to each other across boundaries?
A
. Yes, that’s the difficulty that a lot of the multidisciplinary work has right now—not only between academics but to government, to nonprofits, to social entrepreneurs, to start-ups. That part of it can be improved. That’s where I’d like to make a lot of impact is to try to reach out to different cultures, to different sectors.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://twitter.com/jduart Josep M Duart

    Interesting view of interdisciplinarity.

  • jesimielmillar

    I completely agree with Mr. Ito when he says: “My problem was I could get on the Internet and learn most of the stuff that I needed to learn. What I wanted from academia was coaching, was excitement, was projects. And the undergraduate programs I attended didn’t have that.” That is indeed a great problem that we have in our society, and in our educational system in particular. We have educational institutions of higher learning (not including the technical colleges because they are typically more hands on training which fits that educational perspective) where professors are more concerned about their academic and personal research and the corresponding publications, and less about the success of their students. That is a system that is oftentimes created and perpetuated by the college/university itself, which places too much merit on the publication/research capacity of their staff, but, at the same time either turn a blind eye to the effectiveness of their teaching methodologies, or ignore student’s request for more effective teaching altogether. It is a very hypocritical system. I had a few online classes in my criminal justice undergaduate major where the professors were doing no teaching at all, simply putting up material and grading assignments, not even participating in the discussion boards, or providing feedback, encourament, coaching, etc. Among those professors were lawyers and one of them (which class I dropped because the selfishness and lack of integrity was too much for me to accept or comprehend) was a current Florida Judge, teaching part time at FIU. I was even threatened by one of those professors to be charged with disciplinary misconduct for bringing up the issue in the class of the lack of teaching or instructor involvement. Thus, I challenged the professor, and resolved the conflict, completed the class, and didn’t report it. However, in other unethical instances of other professor’s behaviors, reporting it to administration is only a little game of “don’t worry professor ‘Such,’ we shall give you a little pad on the back, tell you not to do it again, and don’t upset those inexperienced students, Please!”

    That is the kind of hypocrisy prevalent in higher education. I am even surprised that Mr. Ito was hired at MIT without a PhD in “I designed heaven and the known galaxies.” Probably he doesn’t have any times of unemployment on his resume, no quitting jobs because he would rather be unemployed than to be a part of unethical (sometimes illegal) business practices, all to see those employees with a flowless/continous employment record, but careless about integrity and ethics, get the open positions. MIT has always been a leader not only in refining the best minds of the country and internationally, but, also within such a realm of enlightened leadership, of being able to see value and potential where other elite universities fail to. Thus, I am happy that Mr. Ito got a part of that institutional/professional functionality. However, I assure you that even MIT needs great work in terms of improving social justice systems and functional paradigms of extrapolating the needed networking of human potential within our society.

    Jesimiel Millar
    Florida International University
    (Grad St. – Higher Ed Admin)
    jesimielmillar@hotmail.com

  • http://twitter.com/roYabdo roYAbdo

    Cool

  • jeffbellamy

    Joi,

    Congratulations on your new position. It’s great to embark on an exiting new undertaking. I think the key is to be constantly moving outside of your comfort zone. That is where the interesting things happen; out on the border.

    I’m sure you’ll do a great job and I’m looking forward to hearing how things go.

  • http://twitter.com/myerscb Corey Myers

    I wonder if he put WoW guild leader on his resume. :P

  • FrancisHamit

    I’ve known Joi Ito for many years, from hi-tech trade shows. He was a disciple of Timothy Leary’s when Leary was trying to hitch is fading star to Virtual Reality. (I wrote a book about VR that was published in 1993.) Joi and I have had our disagreements about intellectual property law. However, he is a very appropriate person to lead the Media Lab, which was founded on a “think outside the box” ethic. Most of the high-tech mavens who have advanced technology over the past 30 years have not followed the traditional academic path, but broke trail into new intellectual territory. I wish him well.

  • richardtaborgreene

    It is important to force faculty and force students and force administrators and force this and force that—-the rhetoric of the writer reveal his/her/its underlying agenda—forcing people in the “right”.   Dictators always need to appeal to force because virtues of non-dictators are never enough.  YUK

    AND there is the little matter of what a “core” is, some useful definitions from our past:
    1) mass killers study–great men of history
    2) a bunch of seeds in tough fibrous material to be separated from the juicy good stuff
    3) a study of how people white and male like me are the source of all goodness and rightness
    4) a repetition of the past 2000 years of my history as a kind of act of worship
    5) a collection of really racist imperial deluded male ideas taken as a cultural neutral
    6) a good excuse to kill poor people globally, vietnamese, iraqis, aphaghanistanis,
    7) proof that Harvard’s elite research methods produce evil.

  • frankschmidt

    A few comments, just from a cursory reading:

     1. I have looked at the Khan Academy offerings in my discipline. They are not even at Scientific American level, let alone what I expect from my upperclass students. If that’s the “new model” we’re in trouble.
    2. The “graduates taking jobs that require less than a college degree” is a time-dependent criterion. I recall in the ’70s, there were “engineers driving taxicabs.” Odd how an economic recovery alters that metric. Secondly, many jobs which didn’t require higher ed previously (e.g., sales) now do so, often because of the technical nature of what is being sold (pharmaceuticals, computer systems, etc.)
    3. You have not defined efficiency in a way that is applicable to the many missions of higher education. The traditional definition “more output with less input” implies that students are widgets. If so, I am sorry for anyone taking such a class.

  • polisciguy

    I’m sorry—they feed you a meal when they interview you for a college teaching job? The best I have ever received was a glass of iced tea at Carrows (I didn’t get that job, not surprisingly I suppose). I adjunct these days after my day job and dream one day, in the sunny and distant future, when I might be offered a meal (a nice salad perhaps, as I like to keep my dreams reasonable), while I plead for a job for which 8 to 10 other likely more qualified candidates are being considered. 

    Let me assure you, any selection committee will not have to worry about me ordering the osso bucco on a “first date,” so to speak.   

  • nilbogboh

    I sincerely hope that all search committees are not petty and judgmental as this. There are plenty of reasons why someone might not like Mexican food that have nothing to do close-mindedness or racism. My father has a serious aversion to onions and therefore never eats Mexican food, does that make him a racist? Ridiculous. Personally, as a vegetarian I worry all of the time that people won’t want to work with me because they see my food choices as difficult, picky, or even naive. How about members of the search committee maintain an open mind too?

  • dee615

    Do I have a particularly memorable dinner interview stories? Do I ever. This was not a case of being the candidate ignored by the committee, but the reverse. Throughout the entire dinner, the Engineering candidate acted as if I were completely invisible. (There were only three committee members present at the dinner.) When the server presented the check to me, the candidate’s jaw literally went slack. It was at that point that my presence registered in his consciousness – albeit momentarily.  At the end of the dinner he extended his hand to the other two committee members, but not to me. It  so happened that I was standing directly in front of him. Yes, extend hand to committee member to my left; mumble usual pleasantries. Ditto with person to my right. His dinner behavior was the final nail that sealed his fate. (Going through the list of possible reasons for his behavior, I strongly suspect that my being a foreign, Asian female is at least tangentially relevant.)

  • treehugger1

    @chronicle-c34e1994e74287d1703062dc315714d4:disqus:

    It’s funny that you should be the one invoking “scientific evidence” (re: breast-feeding and spicy foods). Where is the scientific evidence that “people who avoid ethnic food [are] a bit racist?” Or is this just what you happen to think? What you have been told? Really, where is the evidence?