• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

IPods Harmful to Hearing?

September 5, 2006, 1:57 pm

The Royal National Institute for Deaf People, in Britian, is calling for manufacturers of digital-music players that attach directly to the ears to provide clearer warning labels on their products advising people not to listen to the players too loudly.

According to the institute, 79 percent of people between the ages of 16 and 30 have never seen the warning labels, and 58 percent of people in this age group are unaware that they could suffer hearing loss from using the devices.

"New technology and ever-increasing storage capacity enables people to listen nonstop for hours – and at louder volumes than ever before. If you are regularly plugged in, it is only too easy to clock up noise doses that could damage your hearing forever," John Low, the chief exective of the institute, was quoted as saying in a news release issued by the group.—Andrea L. Foster

This entry was posted in Student Life. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (23)

23 Responses to IPods Harmful to Hearing?

ptk_etal - May 17, 2012 at 3:10 pm

It was a great presentation, very clear and authentic, anyway I like my human presentations non-robotic.

Western_Dave - May 17, 2012 at 3:19 pm

I didn’t notice the ums in the Ted talk.  My theory is that the ums cue listeners that something important is coming up and give them time to catch up.   I’ve long noticed that if I’m losing the room in a talk, I should slow down, not speed up. 

bwogilvie - May 17, 2012 at 4:04 pm

I haven’t listened to your talk, but I have noticed that I’m much more aware of the ums, pauses, and errors in my own recorded talks than in those by others, probably because I already know the content, and thus I concentrate on the form.

One a related note, I realizes some years ago that lecturing in rooms that seat 120-150 (and sometimes 250) has led me to adopt a kind of booming voice delivery that reaches everyone but cuts out a lot of the variety of which my voice is capable. I’ve considered emulating Spalding Gray’s delivery, which would require a mike in big classrooms, but would give me a much broader palette with which to work.

sherbygirl - May 17, 2012 at 4:12 pm

I give my students a lecture every semester about eliminating “punctuation words” from their essays (the so’s, well’s, likes, and, I swear, one students even had an um in his paper once). My worst habit is turning my sentences into questions by ending them with, right? I get painfully self-conscious whenever I do this lecture because I become acutely aware of how bad my speech patterns really are. But it’s only when I lecture; when I present, they seem to lesson (but not disappear).

physioprof - May 17, 2012 at 8:52 pm

Amateur public speakers–and I include academics in this category–almost always speak way too fast. Listen to a really good political speechmaker, and if you pay attention to the cadence, you’ll be shocked at how slow they are speaking. The ums and ahs and whatnot are effective because they force you to slow down and give the audience time to catch up. If you speak slowly enough, you don’t need them.

aeonelpis - May 17, 2012 at 9:17 pm

I teach public speaking and communication, and I do notice when people fill their pauses up with disfluencies (or vocalized fillers). The pauses need to stay in place, but you can ditch the um, uh, and ah for other, more productive, pauses.

Pausing for the audience to catch up matters. On the whole, people struggle to retain information they only hear, so having a moment to pause and take stock helps people to integrate the new information into the big picture. It’s like the old Mario Brothers games — you finish a level (a section or point of the speech) and you pop back up to the big map, showing you where you stand in the big picture. Audiences need these pauses and moments of reflection. The disfluencies can go away, but you need to keep the pausing.
Audiences respond best to people they perceive as genuine, another reason I suspect that people responded to the disfluencies in this study. The vocalized fillers make the address seem less memorized and rehearsed. In the trade, we call this extemporaneous delivery. It’s prepared, practiced some (I recommend 8-12 times), but you don’t have it all scripted or memorized. Speaking from notes almost always results in a speech that connects better with the audience.

If you want to cut out the fillers, try cutting them down by halves. The first step is awareness. Try to sort out what leads you to fill the pauses. Are you trying to think of what to say next? Pause and look at your cards instead. Are you nervous? Take a drink of water to ease the symptoms. Do you have a lot of energy and the words are coming too quickly so the um, uh, and ah make their way into the stream? Move around and gesture (it will absorb the hormones and help you calm down). If you cut half out each time you speak, you’ll form new habits that replace the filled pauses.

studentteacher - May 18, 2012 at 8:10 am

Thank you so much for the original talk and passing along “Don’t Ditch the Ums.”  I like ums so much better than the aggressive punctuations “look” and “listen,” and better than “right,” especially when said without the rise at the end.  I have tried to leave the space and do a silent “um.”  Perhaps an “um drum” we could hit each time we get to that moment would work. :)

I’m terribly conflicted about recording my voice for students and “memorialization.”  A colleague of mind recently died and her online recordings have become problematic for her family and friends…perhaps with time.

studentteacher - May 18, 2012 at 8:12 am

Thank you so much for the original talk and passing along “Don’t Ditch the Ums.”  I like ums so much better than the aggressive punctuations “look” and “listen,” and better than “right,” especially when said without the rise at the end.  I have tried to leave the space and do a silent “um.”  Perhaps an “um drum” we could hit each time we get to that moment would work. :)

I’m terribly conflicted about recording my voice for students and “memorialization.”  A colleague of mind recently died and her online recordings have become problematic for her family and friends…perhaps with time.

mcmacdonald - May 18, 2012 at 8:14 am

Scott Fraundorf and Duane Watson’s research undoubtedly explains something that may have been omitted from the press release:  pauses are the speaker’s (largely unconsious) strategy to allow extra planning time for the next chunk of material to be said.  Therefore, as several comments here note, the more you practice and also learn to slow down, the less you umm.  Since the pausing and similar strategies like adding filler words (like, um, you know, sort of) are an unconscious and natural consequence of the way unpracticed language production works, practicing the material is a better strategy for getting rid of these things than consciously trying to eliminate them.

henrycalphinjr - May 18, 2012 at 9:08 am

I don’t see why there is a link in the picture and headline between stuttering and speech quirks. Both stutterers and non-stutterers use filler words, but stuttering is a bit more than a quirk. I figured that it need not be said that one is a disability and the other a temporary roadblock, but the picture and headline tell me otherwise.

jjdeal - May 18, 2012 at 9:35 am

I was broken of “ums” and “ahs” in high school by a history teacher and his “Ahh Meter.”  Students would be given a photo from that day’s newspaper and asked to speak extemporaneously for three minutes.  Said teacher would sit in the back of the room with a 3 lb coffee can and a handful of huge nuts and bolts.  Upon the first “ah” or “um” –  WHAM…the bolts and nuts hit the can with the most awful racket.  Cured every single one of us of that habit….To this day, I do not punctuate my speeches or lectures with “ums” or “ahs,” and I find it most distracting to listen to someone who does.  Thank you Larry Marzulli!!!!

susanda - May 18, 2012 at 9:38 am

Years ago I heard a piece on NPR about how they edit. (I think it was on “On the Media”.) They don’t sound mellifluous and fluent right off the bat, trust me.

v8573254 - May 18, 2012 at 10:03 am

B/c I watched the TED after reading this, I noticed “um.”  No real distraction.
A/b content — K-12 schools could do likewise, and some may do that already when distance or course offerings are big factors.

proftowanda - May 18, 2012 at 10:58 am

Ummmm, don’t worry a bit about it.  I “hear” your voice in your written work, such as an article of yours that I just cited in my work in progress . . . and you sound brilliant in your article.  (More fun, when I found your article and found it to be spot-on for my needs, was realizing that the author is aka Tenured Radical, so that I could picture your visage while I “heard” your voice in your work.)

kimpetorin - May 18, 2012 at 12:17 pm

 lessen

godard - May 18, 2012 at 2:49 pm

i, too, notice the “ahs.”  they are as obnoxious as the “like.”  signifiers without signifieds that make the speaker sound illiterate.

timothyquigley - May 18, 2012 at 3:21 pm

Great presentation Claire. I didn’t notice the “disfluencies” either. But I’m with you on the search for more felicitous ways to fill those gaps. Most of us are uncomfortable with “dead air space” when speaking, but I’m coming to feel that simply pausing and allowing listeners in meetings, lecture halls, conversations, etc. to “see me thinking” may be just fine.

Of course, this also means they have to be patient. But maybe that’s okay, too?

aephirah - May 18, 2012 at 3:49 pm

My son took a course with a professor whose “ums” were incredibly distracting.  Since I know this instructor, I am aware that he routinely inserts as many as 5 “ums” per sentence even when he is READING a presentation. (The fact that I have frequently begun to count them also means that I am no longer listening to content.) Normal, natural disfluencies are not a distraction, but exaggerated and persistent ones can be disastrous –especially for someone whose entire career is built around speaking in public.

graddirector - May 18, 2012 at 4:34 pm

I teach an oral presentation  class for science grad students.  I would disagree about the Ums, Ahs, etc.  They should be ditched whenever possible since they are very distracting to the audience and make the speaker sound very uncertain about their topic.  However, I would agree with others about cadence.   Most nervous  speakers go way too fast when over rehearsed.  The key is to just stop talking when thinking about what to say next without putting in an UM.  However, it can be weird and distracting to take that too far as well.  Once I had a student who would pause 15 seconds between slides….

urbanexile - May 18, 2012 at 8:43 pm

As your putative publicist, I would like to see half the ums and few more dramatic silences accompanied by intense gazes into the audience. It was, however, a very good talk.

Tenured_Radical - May 19, 2012 at 8:14 am

While people who are distressed by their own, and others’, stuttering may disagree, I’m not altogether sure that the distinction is that clear cut, except that the two are subject to different forms of stigma. The link was intentional. It was intended to make readers think about listening, patterns of speech that are perhaps wrongly viewed as shameful and disfunctional, and the dominant assumption that disfluent speech patterns indicate disorganized thought and a lack of will.  I know several academics who stutter and the corollary to this research would be that they are extraordinarily popular teachers from whom students claim to learn in distinctive ways.  I am also using the word “quirk” deliberately, since it is exactly employed that way in Looney Tunes.  If you notice, Porky Pig usually has something extraordinarily important to say, and he makes you wait for it.  Daffy Duck, however, is elegantly verbose and says almost nothing of any substance.

henrycalphinjr - May 21, 2012 at 8:42 am

Thank you for the reply. Your thoughts here would have been better served in the article, though. Stuttering is not mentioned within the text of the article, while the headline and picture place it at the forefront of the reader’s thought on the matter.

From the view of the listener, stuttering and filler words may be similar as potential disfluency, or as you mention, perceived lack of will, but that’s an entirely different article. To posit that a fluent speaker’s filler words are akin to stuttering in any manner just seems off. If a listener cannot tell the difference between a stutterer and a few ums, then the listener is not empathetic and/or the stuttering is quite mild.

baruch2 - May 22, 2012 at 9:55 am

Depending on the number of “um”s and how jarringly they’re said, I can sometimes find myself focusing more on them than on the presentation content. Generally, it seems that heavy reliance on “um”s means the speaker should slow down, not necessarily polish their presentation to the point of being robotic.