The National Security Agency is financing research on how to collect data from the Internet to create extensive personal profiles of individuals. With services such as MySpace and Friendster chock full of personal information, the Web is a treasure trove, security experts say, just waiting to be sorted and categorized. By combining Web information with other data, such as those gathered by analyzing telephone records, the NSA may be able to find out more about people and the connections between them. (New Scientist)
Tech Therapy
View more >>College 2.0: Jeff Young on IT
-
'Social-Media Blasphemy': An Academic Adds 'Enemy' Feature to Facebook
An application that allows Facebook users to "enemy" people is meant to make us think critically about social media, its creators say.
- A Tech-Happy Professor Reboots After Hearing His Teaching Advice Isn't Working
- 'Badges' Earned Online Pose Challenge to Traditional College Diplomas
Hot Type: Jennifer Howard on Publishing
-
Who Gets to See Published Research?
The MIT Press and other critics say proposed legislation to limit public access to the results of some studies would work against the open exchange of ideas.
-
A New Journal for Life Scientists by Life Scientists Hopes to Lure Prestige
-
'Princeton Shorts' Tries to Lure Readers With Digital Excerpts From Full Books




24 Responses to In Plain Sight
picky - February 9, 2012 at 5:27 am
The fact that British English hasn’t changed quite that much over the intervening years is indicated by my knowing immediately that you have “loo” in the wrong column.
Mary Davenport Davis - February 9, 2012 at 10:15 am
I have to say that this list does not map well onto my own experience growing up around but not of the 1%. Prep school vs. Boarding school–maybe, but I tend to think of the terms as lexically distinct. A boarding school is where you board your children; a prep school is designed to get them into a good college. Most boarding schools are also prep schools, but only some prep schools are boarding schools.
With boat vs. yacht, my experience has been that speech context has a lot to do with it. I tend to think of “boat” as general-purpose, and “yacht” as a technical term. You call up a friend to say you’re taking the boat out tomorrow and would she like to come; you tell an acquaintance at a party that you like to take trips out on your boat, and, when she asks, you specify that it’s a 40 foot yacht. This seems to me to apply to most people with boats, regardless of class.
Could this be a regional thing? Most of my experience comes from the South and Mid-Atlantic.
dank48 - February 9, 2012 at 11:03 am
Our class differences seem to me to be marked at least as sharply by grammar and pronunciation (“accent”) as by vocabulary. In every region, there’s stratification by how we say it as well as by what we say. Novice novelists trying for “backwoods” markers often fall into the trap of pegging characters by word choice, assisted by phonetic spelling, and the choices are generally the same: “likker,” “britches,” “vittles.” One wonders how they think “liquor,” “breeches,” and “victuals” are supposed to be pronounced.
The overuse of “ladies” and “gentlemen” for “women” and “men,” however, is definitely a tell.
Guest - February 9, 2012 at 12:41 pm
Raven McDavid and Hans Kurath called the peculiar spellings “eye dialect.”
jffoster - February 9, 2012 at 2:26 pm
Yacht is also a technical term with regard to registration. Boats of or over a certain size can be registered with the Federal Government as a Yacht and entitled to wear the U S Yacht Ensign instead of the usual Merchant/Naval Ensign ~ National Flag. And they have a registered name but do not have State registration or bow numbers. But I doubt if that’s general to most Americans.
davidfromdarkestpa - February 9, 2012 at 2:28 pm
Saying “boat” displays a clear lack of sophistication–there are many kinds of vessels and someone wealthy enough to own one would never confuse his/her 3-master with their cigarette boat.
jffoster - February 9, 2012 at 2:29 pm
Withe respect to how students address professors, I suggest the regional variation here may override the class one. While it is apparently common among some East Coast universities and the NY Times, the Cincinnati Enquirer, and the CHE to use the title Dr. only for people with medical degrees, (reverse snobbery??, deliberate put down of nonmedical doctorates??,…), in the Middle West and South, it is usual to use the title Dr. as an address, even in relatively or very selective private colleges and “public ivies”.
dank48 - February 9, 2012 at 3:07 pm
What a great term for something I didn’t even know there was a term for.
Richard Grayson - February 9, 2012 at 11:49 pm
In Burma/Myanmar:
U: U Thant
Non-U: George Orwell
sibyl - February 10, 2012 at 10:39 am
I think this is more institutional than regional.
(I know some institutions where “Mr.” and “Ms.” are flaunted in a show of egalitarianism, and others that insist on the use of the term “Dean” when addressing anyone entitled to it, even if that person is the most junior assistant dean. Institutional customs are idiosyncratic.)
I know many Northeastern institutions where “Dr.” is used, although they tend to be among the less prestigious. Perhaps the general rule is that it is more frequently used at institutions where it cannot be assumed that a faculty member holds the Ph.D.
theart - February 10, 2012 at 2:16 pm
On the contrary. In some circles, any description other than just “boat” is considered a vulgar attempt by the speaker to impress the listener. Someone wealthy enough to own a 3-master either doesn’t care if you know it or hasn’t been wealthy very long.
andremayer - February 11, 2012 at 2:58 pm
I’d suggest that how professors are addressed is determined by the status of the institution, not of the student. I agree with Ms Davis about “boarding school” – a descriptive term with, if anything, slight punitive overtones. On the other hand,I can report that those of us who attended elite residential secondary schools do refer to them as “prep schools,” but are reluctant to extend that term to even the most prestigious school with no residential component.
winonaww - February 11, 2012 at 4:15 pm
Students’ habits, aside, those professors who insist on being called “Dr.” are certainly non-U speakers. Those institutions who encourage this are often schools who are associated with specific, often marginalized, identity groups, such as church-related schools or those who preferentially serve one cultural group or another.
winonaww - February 11, 2012 at 4:17 pm
“Among” and “amongst”; “divan” or “sofa” and “couch.” And a good share of our health conditions: “woman problems,” for example, rather than “ovarian” or “menstrual.” Yes, some of how we identify language rests in regional allowances; however, the influx of Anglo-phone speakers from other countries have complicated this: almost without exception these new Americans speak a definitely non-U English thinking that they are doing just the opposite, and their mixtures of registers and regionalisms are sometimes head-spinning.
jpminnc - February 11, 2012 at 11:12 pm
There’s also an element of willful modesty in using “boat” for “yacht,” the way classical violinists occasionally say “I fiddle for the xyz orchestra,” when “fiddle music” (such as Bluegrass) is the last thing they would ever be interested in. Such usages are closely bound to social class, but precisely because of that, people carefully modulate how they use their vocabulary. It’s impossible to just make a simple equation a=U: b=non-U.
manoflamancha - February 12, 2012 at 2:28 pm
The British uppers have so many silly “inversions” in language. When you asked how they like the soup, they may reply :”Quite good.” Which translated means “bloody awfull”
latico - February 12, 2012 at 3:56 pm
I grew up in Vermont, and “thanks much” was a feature of the local dialect, associated with “real Vermonters” and not with preppy interlopers with summer houses (“flatlanders”). So I have a hard time hearing it as an elite locution when it is so strongly associated with non-elite speakers in my experience. I would think that the U usage would be simply “Thanks” or “Thank you,” without embellishment.
elsieboy - February 12, 2012 at 10:08 pm
Are you certain about that?
zenprof - February 13, 2012 at 7:47 am
Usually we just say “school” (implying secondary school), simply assuming it was One Of Those, either boarding or day; “college” means university. It is the assumptions underneath to listen for, yes?
elidger - February 13, 2012 at 7:35 pm
A very useful piece of information for us, foreigners.We can hardly find anything of the sort from what’s available here. Thank you very much.
picky - February 14, 2012 at 10:29 am
Well, elsieboy, I was certain about that, and resumably Mr Yagoda was, because he has corrected his post, although without publishing a note drawing attention to his correction, and without adding a footnote to my comment. I don’t know about you, but I don’t consider that best journalistic practice, do you?
picky - February 14, 2012 at 12:02 pm
Ooops – how hamfisted! I’ve replied to you, elsieboy, but incompetence has shoved my reply way down on 14 Feb
elsieboy - February 14, 2012 at 3:59 pm
Ah yes I must have been looking at the corrected one, which looks perfectly right to me.
hlandecker - February 17, 2012 at 12:13 pm
Picky: Sorry, and thanks so much for your eagle eye. I did correct “loo” because of your note–you were exactly right. And I should have noted that and thanked you when I did it, but I forgot. Mea culpa, No excuses, except too many tasks, too small a brain.