• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

Elimination of California Agency Could Limit Access to Student Data

August 11, 2011, 8:10 pm

The elimination of California’s higher-education coordinating board is causing concern among some researchers that decades of data about college students will be harder to access.

In a line-item veto last month, Gov. Jerry Brown eliminated support for the California Postsecondary Education Commission, calling it “ineffective.” The surprise move has provoked concern that the commission’s student-records database dating back to 1976 will be in limbo—or even lost—when the agency closes in September.

The database includes statistics on enrollment, transfer between public institutions, college-going rates for high-school students, and other measures that can be difficult or impossible to get from each of the state’s three college systems.

“We don’t know what the $11-billion we’re spending on higher education is delivering for us,” said Adrian Griffin, the commission’s assistant director of research and policy development. “Without this, it’s hard to tell how well students are succeeding, how well the transfer system is working, and how well university graduates are doing in the labor market.”

But college officials downplayed those concerns. The database will be moved to the community-college system, and the state’s college systems have agreed to keep contributing information until it can find a new home, said Patrick Perry, the community colleges’ vice chancellor of technology, research, and information systems.

“Data won’t be destroyed,” Mr. Perry said. He said the system’s goal is to prevent a gap in data collection and to make sure the data remains available to the public.

However, he said it was too early to say whether the community colleges would be able to maintain an existing Web site that allows researchers, journalists, and others to access the data online. Mr. Griffin said he doubts the colleges will have the resources to maintain online access or handle specific questions from researchers, legislators, or the public.

Richard W. Moore, a researcher who has used the commission’s data, bemoaned the loss of an independent agency that can analyze information about the nation’s largest higher-education system and provide policy recommendations to lawmakers. The colleges will not have the same mandate reporting on themselves, he said.

“We really kind of expect better from California,” said Mr. Moore, a management professor at California State University at Northridge. “There was an era when we led in this way, when we had the best system and the best data. We don’t anymore.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • Prof_truthteller

    Apres moi, le deluge. Who cares? Cut first, ask questions later. It’s the new budget planning paradigm. Hey, everyone else is doing it- even the federal government- why not California?

  • chriskox

    Pish tush!  Archive it!

  • johnblee

    States are spending a lot of time an money on building record systems that help track students through their education.  The data have the effect of helping leaders understand the problem areas where the education system can be improved.  Without this knowledge political preferences and guesses about what works will provide the basis for critical education and funding decisions.  Cutting this capacity is a loss for California, but other states have reduced funding for state analysts who help make sense of these data.  Sad to walk away from a valuable resource that can make a difference. 

  • readkc

    Related LA Times story: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-jerry-brown-20110817,0,570235.story
    “Bruised by budget battle, Jerry Brown curbs ambitions”