• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

Colleges Say They Didn’t Delete Online Material on Planned Parenthood

May 4, 2011, 7:30 pm

The Cardinal Newman Society, a conservative Roman Catholic organization, said on Monday that two dozen Catholic colleges had removed mentions of Planned Parenthood from their Web sites after facing criticism over the material.

But while several colleges acknowledged deleting material, officials at five colleges on the group’s list denied removing any mention of the reproductive-rights organization. And many of the Web pages that the colleges supposedly modified still mention Planned Parenthood.

The Cardinal Newman Society has long criticized Catholic colleges for promoting practices that it believes are inconsistent with Catholic doctrine. Last month, as lawmakers debated federal support for Planned Parenthood, the society released a report that admonished colleges for including references to the organization in online medical resources, internship listings, and staff biographies.

The society reported on Monday that 24 colleges had since removed information about Planned Parenthood from their Web sites. “Probably in most of the cases, the college leaders were unaware of the links and genuinely wanting to see those removed,” Patrick J. Reilly, the group’s president, said on Wednesday.

Officials at three colleges—the University of Dayton, Saint Leo University, and St. Catherine University—said they had removed the Planned Parenthood information either directly or indirectly in response to the report.

The University of Dayton purchased a digital flier for its career-services Web site, called “What Can I Do With This Major?”, without knowing that Planned Parenthood was one of many options provided, said Teri Rizvi, a spokeswoman. Once officials learned of the reference, it modified the flier, she said.

“As a Catholic university, the University of Dayton does not affiliate itself with Planned Parenthood,” Ms. Rizvi wrote in an e-mail.

But officials at five colleges listed by the Cardinal Newman Society, including some of the more-prominent institutions on the list, rejected the idea that they had deleted any mention of Planned Parenthood from their Web sites. A few of them said the information was still in the same online location.

“The Cardinal Newman Society has no academic standing and has been admonished by Catholic bishops for using scare tactics that are designed to induce elderly donors into supporting their misguided efforts,” said Jack Dunn, a spokesman at Boston College. “As a Jesuit, Catholic university, Boston College has never been influenced by them.”

The society had said that an online biography of Connie Griffin, an adjunct literature professor at Boston College, had previously listed course materials from Fall 2006 that recommended Web sites for Planned Parenthood and other like-minded organizations. The syllabus is no longer on the Web site, and Ms. Griffin did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Web page of another college cited in the report, Edgewood College of Wisconsin, still has links and phone numbers to Planned Parenthood. Officials at Gonzaga University, the University of San Diego, the University of San Francisco, and Dominican University of California said they did not remove any information about Planned Parenthood from their Web sites.

“I don’t know how they can say that it’s been removed,” said David Sonntag, a Gonzaga spokesman. “If you go to the site, you’ll find it’s still there.”

When asked about the discrepancies, Mr. Reilly of the Cardinal Newman Society said he wasn’t sure why some colleges were listed as deleting Planned Parenthood material when they hadn’t done so. “I have no explanation for that,” he said.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • 22280998

    Isn’t editing people’s biographies going a bit far? However, I am more concerned about the demand not to hire anyone who worked with or for any organization that is involved in advising or offering abortions.

  • jkseago

    Catholic Universities should stand by the ideologies that founded them. If this means that they cannot support the effort of Planned Parenthood shouldn’t they have the right to remove objectionable content from their website?

  • chuckkle

    Pragmatically, Planned Parenthood is often the lowest cost basic health service for women in many communities. It is also often the first choice of clients for various forms of birth control (shocking news! many Catholic men and most Catholic women use some form of birth control besides abstinence and pre-ejaculation withdrawal). If unmarried, and you had to choose the student health service at a Catholic college or Planned Parenthood, who would you go to first? Get real, people, Catholic women are totally capable of distinguishing between getting a routine pap smear at PP, getting the pill or a patch there , and getting an abortion through PP.

    Chuck Kleinhans

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XBTCBYVYW5KBTSW5TBVZE2OJBM l

    From the Pope 4/2008
    It comes as no surprise, then, that not just our own ecclesial communities but society in general has high expectations of Catholic educators. This places upon you a responsibility and offers an opportunity. More and more people – parents in particular – recognize the need for excellence in the human formation of their children. As Mater et Magistra, the Church shares their concern. When nothing beyond the individual is recognized as definitive, the ultimate criterion of judgment becomes the self and the satisfaction of the individual’s immediate wishes. The objectivity and perspective, which can only come through a recognition of the essential transcendent dimension of the human person, can be lost. Within such a relativistic horizon the goals of education are inevitably curtailed. Slowly, a lowering of standards occurs. We observe today a timidity in the face of the category of the good and an aimless pursuit of novelty parading as the realization of freedom. We witness an assumption that every experience is of equal worth and a reluctance to admit imperfection and mistakes.

    *And particularly disturbing, is the reduction of the precious and delicate area of education in sexuality to management of ‘risk’, bereft of any reference to the beauty of conjugal love.*

    How might Christian educators respond? These harmful developments point to the particular urgency of what we might call “intellectual charity”. This aspect of charity calls the educator to recognize that the profound responsibility to lead the young to truth is nothing less than an act of love. Indeed, the dignity of education lies in fostering the true perfection and happiness of those to be educated. In practice “intellectual charity” upholds the essential unity of knowledge against the fragmentation which ensues when reason is detached from the pursuit of truth. It guides the young towards the deep satisfaction of exercising freedom in relation to truth, and it strives to articulate the relationship between faith and all aspects of family and civic life. Once their passion for the fullness and unity of truth has been awakened, young people will surely relish the discovery that the question of what they can know opens up the vast adventure of what they ought to do. Here they will experience “in what” and “in whom” it is possible to hope, and be inspired to contribute to society in a way that engenders hope in others.