• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

Campus Newspapers Consider Charging for Content

October 14, 2011, 2:07 pm

A new effort will help college newspapers add paywalls to their Web sites, enabling editors to collect donations or charge subscription fees to frequent readers of online editions.

The digital-subscription company Press+ and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation will cover the start-up fees for adding a meter system to the first 50 campus papers that sign up.

So far, most of the newspapers interested in adopting the system do not plan to charge on-campus users, and many plan to simply ask for donations from off-campus readers rather than making payment mandatory.

The project follows recent high-profile moves by national and local newspapers, such as The New York Times and The Dallas Morning News, to require readers to pay for access to certain online content.

Boston University’s Daily Free Press introduced a system for donations a few weeks ago, and it has already brought in some additional revenue, said Annie Ropeik, chair of the paper’s board of directors.

“We were skittish at first of the idea of an actual paywall that would lock you out,” Ms. Ropeik said. “But once the donation idea came up, it seemed like a no-lose situation for us.”

Ms. Ropeik, a senior at the university, said the paper is struggling to cover costs and it’s hoped that the donation system will help, even if it doesn’t net big revenue.

A few college newspapers are experimenting with charging for content. Oklahoma State University’s Daily O’Collegian was the first campus newspaper to charge for online content. Under its model, any non-student outside a 25-mile radius of the college must pay $10 a year for access to more than three articles a month.

Jeff Jarvis, a blogger and professor of new media at the City University of New York, said he can’t fathom why a campus newspaper would want to charge readers, even to only those off campus. Most college newspapers, he said, accrue little cost because their labor is voluntary and the printed paper, if there is one, is generally paid for through student dues.

But to Gordon Crovitz, the co-founder of Press+, the idea is not only about financial gain, but also offers a way to teach student journalists about new business models.

“The student journalists running college newspapers who hope to have a career in journalism are very aware that the traditional media model is broken,” he said in a statement. “This generation needs to find new revenue streams, including new ways to collect revenues from the readers who get the most value from the access.”

For Boston University’s Daily Free Press, though, Ms. Ropeik said her paper’s new policy is all about the money. The donation page on the Web site, she said, is a way to reach out to current donors in a more obvious way, and perhaps get others to support the paper as well.

Mr. Jarvis said college newspapers should instead model their ideas on Facebook in trying to find new revenue streams.

“Rather than experimenting with paywalls and trying to learn from that,” Mr. Jarvis said, “I think colleges would be much better off asking, ‘What would Mark Zuckerberg do?’ ”

This entry was posted in Publishing, Student Life. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • akprof

    At least it was purchased by NPR rather than FOX!! 

  • jcarp6501

    Hmmm,  at least with FOX you would have the opportunity to hear more than a liberal agenda.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Nashblackcat Kevin Groce

    Who cares I don’t want the format of wrvu to change. It’s always politics with you people.  If you don’t know what WRVU was then why comment.

  • texasmusic

    If you’re trying to teach them new business models, that’s good, but pick one that has a shot of working.  I can’t imagine many people will want to pay to access a college newspaper, especially if they’re not a student.  Frankly, I can imagine even fewer students who would be willing to pay for a subscription.

  • jacobseric

    Professor Jarvis may be an expert on new media, but he really doesn’t know what he’s talking about in terms of campus newspapers. His claim that “Most college newspapers accrue little cost because their labor is voluntary and the printed paper, if there is one, is generally paid for through student dues” is pretty far off the mark. Many college newspapers get only a fraction — in some cases a small fraction — of their budget from student fees, and some — like mine — get no student fees at all. Many college newspapers pay some of the students on their staffs. Most college newspapers have costs for printing and distribution. Many have costs for website hosting. Many have costs for camera equipment and computer hardware and software. Many college newspapers rely on the sale of advertising to balance their budgets, a task made more difficult in recent years as newspaper advertising in general has declined and as newspapers large and small, commercial and college, have struggled to develop workable business models to replace declining print advertising revenues with new online revenues.

    His solution? Invent the next Facebook. Gee, thanks; wish we’d thought of that. At my newspaper, we’re approached at least once a week by software startups who want to partner with us over the cool new web or mobile application they’ve created. (Most have no solid business plan, and most don’t appear to be the next Big Thing — but our student management team is nonetheless tasked with testing, questioning, and evaluating dozens of new ventures in the hope of finding the right one(s) to work with and passing over the ones which will be gone within a year.) Website paywalls may not prove to be a viable solution for college newspapers unless the trend eventually becomes the norm for all news media, but thinking that the staff at each college newspaper can come up with and execute the one-in-a-million highly-successful new web venture seems terribly far-fetched.

    Eric Jacobs
    General Manager
    The Daily Pennsylvanian (Univ. of Pennsylvania)

  • photophil

    Three things for the long run:
    1.In web economics you have to give something away to get something. I was a college newspaper adviser for years and giving away news on the net had hidden benefits not discussed here ….. three articles a month (OSU’s model ) is not good. The Alumni Association should foot  the bill for open access. it does not infringe on press rights nor is it connected directly to the college or university (state schools). It is the alumni and the [potential student who wants to read your paper. Making them pay will … well you know… would you pay for an-online paper college paper you ‘might’ attend’ if you were in high school??

    2. History: too often colleges start skimping on extra copies of the paper and justify it by saying .. well we have it online. then ten years down the road some technology changes and there is no history of the college or the newspaper. Try finding old faculty members on your campus to see what I mean. Historically, they do not exist until you go back far enough. .  say back to 1940s in your library and they do.. Why? A printed yearbook . Free in the library archival without commercial hassle.

    3. Press+ is a corporation. your re turning your archives and online edition over to them for review in a sense. try printing something that is truly controversial that they might feel is inappropriate for their corporate model and see how far that goes. I would use stronger words but over a 45-year slide toward giving the academic world over to ‘business models’ and ‘business sense’, think we would have learned something. oh… the guys protesting Wall Street seem to have gotten it. Look for the greed behind this plan… control and subtle ownership.

    If you turn your paper over to a third -party company to archive, you lose control of your free history.

    Nope… advertising for online papers is a proven model. limiting circulation nad trusting the web folks to keep your paper archived are bad ideas.

    Phil W.
    Former newspaper adviser at several colleges