• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

Archive Watch: British Library Purchases Poet’s 40,000 E-Mails

April 22, 2011, 3:29 pm

E-mails don’t have the inky charisma of handwritten manuscripts, but they’re more and more a part of literary archives. For instance, when the British Library announced this week that it has acquired the poet Wendy Cope‘s archive, it made much of the hybrid nature of the material, which includes thousands of e-mails.

“Retrieved from ‘the cloud’, the collection of approximately 40,000 e-mails dating from 2004 to the present is the most substantial in a literary archive acquired by the British Library to date, affording among other things a fascinating and extensive insight into writerly networks,” the library said. The acquisition cost £32,000 (nearly $53,000), according to the announcement.

“It’s new territory for us,” Rachel Foss, lead curator of modern-literary manuscripts at the British Library, told The Independent newspaper. “This is the second major e-mail acquisition we’ve made, after Harold Pinter’s archive in 2007, but contains more material than that. We are increasingly acquiring digital material; this is going to be the norm as we move forward, and we are going to get to the stage where e-mails replace physical letters.”

In another sign of how institutions approach contemporary hybrid archives, the library also pointed to what it called “enhanced curatorial activities” surrounding the acquisition. Library personnel took digital photographs of the poet’s study to create a panoramic digital view of it. They recorded an interview with Ms. Cope “in which she reflects on her archive and the writing life it represents.” All that “will allow researchers to reconstruct a retrospective context for the physical and electronic records acquired, as well as recording for posterity the space which informed the creative process,” the library said.

A wry and popular poet known, among other things, for her parodies of figures such as Philip Sidney and T.S. Eliot, Ms. Cope is the author of four collections, including Making Cocoa for Kingsley Amis. (The very brief title poem includes a famous line: “Some kind of record seemed vital. “) Her most recent book, Family Values, was published this year.

The library saluted Ms. Cope’s work as representing “a female creative response to the male poetic establishment, inscribing a significant counterpoint to the postwar poetic canon.” That doesn’t quite do justice to poems like her limerick-parody of Eliot’s The Waste Land:

In April one seldom feels cheerful;
Dry stones, sun and dust make me fearful …

See an assortment of Ms. Cope’s love poems here; read her case for abolishing the job of poet laureate here.

According to The Independent, Ms. Cope downplayed the literary interest of her e-mails. She told the paper that many of them “are not interesting at all.”

While some news reports and the library itself highlighted the digital component of the Cope archive, there’s a good deal of old-fashioned literary material for researchers to contemplate as well, including school reports and 67 poetry notebooks. Dating from 1973 to the present, they form “the core of the archive,” the library said, with “drafts of poems, jottings of ideas, notes on form and rhyme scheme juxtaposed with transitory glimpses of everyday life, for example in the meticulous ‘to do’ lists.”

Have a favorite Cope poem? Let us know in the comments.

This entry was posted in Archive Watch, Libraries, Research and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://twitter.com/BLEnglish_Drama jamie andrews

    Nice mentions of all aspects of great acquisition

  • http://twitter.com/marmiedwards Marmie Edwards

    Value of e-mail to track thoughts of poets and advance historical research. Look forward to future development.

  • http://www.facebook.com/geofhuth Geof Huth

    Just before the Text Festival, here’s the confluence of so many of my interests: poetry (though not necessarily to my taste), archives, and electronic records. All hail the British Library for accepting the reality of the contemporary world.

  • http://twitter.com/K4arkive Krista Ferrante

    Glad to see such a large player diving into email archiving

  • nacrandell

    As to the charges:
    a) Trespassing – he probably was behind the counter area or other ‘section’ and this charge was added for effect,
    b) Battery – if he struck or pushed someone or the officer intentionally then he is hit with the charge, pardon the pun,
    c) Resisting arrest – if he become belligerent or physical in any manner, then they can charge him.

    Cut the PC stuff – baggy pants is not cultural wardrobe, just bad parenting on the mom’s part – buy the kid a belt!

  • CU_Alum

    If airline personnel told him to leave the boarding area and he didn’t, that would be trespassing.  I don’t know if that’s what happened, but it’s a plausible explanation.

  • pathogen

    Umm….I certainly hope he didn’t learn that in one of his classes, since it’s a total urban legend. The baggy pants thing MIGHT originate from the fact that in prison, you don’t get a belt so you can’t use it to hang yourself. It’s a fashion trend. That’s it. Hasn’t this airline employee ever set foot in a large city? I see young men wearing this all the time, and the world has yet to end. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Betty-Austin/557082992 Betty Austin

    It’s amazing to hear about the way people respond to personal appearances.  I’m interested in knowing how the University will respond to this student’s arrest.  My doctoral dissertation has to do with school dress codes, and I’m trying to find a focus that has to do with teacher dress, and how students perceive their teachers.  The study hasn’t yet been fully crafted.  Any topic that has to do with adornment and education has meaning to me at this point.  I would appreciate any comments along these lines.

    Thanks.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Betty-Austin/557082992 Betty Austin

    This young man is representing his University.  I’m wondering how the college will respond to his arrest?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Betty-Austin/557082992 Betty Austin

    This person who called and reported him, was naive?  Or What?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Betty-Austin/557082992 Betty Austin

    Good point nacrandell.  How do you classify a cultural wardrobe?  That is new terminology for me.

  • mikewillis

    The story I heard was that it started because “saggin’” spelled backwards is…  This was the tale in a semi-urban high school I once taught in.

  • whizzkid43

    This so called fashion trend is not an urban legend. It is truth. I am an African American female and a university professor and I can tell you that even though many young men and women of all races and backgrounds like to wear their pants this way, it is simply indecent exposure, poor upbringing and frankly disgusting. Just because a group of people have adopted this lack of dress as a so called fashion statement does not mean the rest of society has to acquiesce, be PC and accept this behavior. Get a belt, wear pants that fit and keep your not so private parts to yourselves!!!

  • richardtaborgreene

    now if he had been arrested for “inadequate symmetry of boxer print pattern” THAT would have been cool 

  • wilcoxlibrary

    The correct term for the dress style is “sagging.”  It comes out of the prison system due to no belts to hold up pants.

  • FUtah2011

    Haven’t we had enough wiener stories already this week?

  • 22278921

    What about women who wear tank tops that reveal their bras? Or the ones who wear low cut pants so that the tattoo on their backsides shows?  Or t-shirts with lewd and abrasive inscriptions?  Don’t we see these on campuses every day?  Truthfully, this type of thing, including the pants that seem in imminate danger of falling off, are tacky and unpleasant. They do reflect the sloppy standards of our society (e.g., people wearing jogging suits to church or golf attire to a funeral).  However, as I walk across campus or look down the rows in the classroom, I take comfort in the fact that this too shall pass. These kids will grow up and get jobs and that will be the end of their youthful fashion fling, except of course that they will be stuck witht the tatts. My generation offended adults by wearing long hair, beards, love beads and peace signs.  There was widespread certainty that we were bringing civilization to a new low.  And so it goes.

    On a more serious note, though, maestrho has made important points about the tenor of the discussion here.  The underlying racism is clear in some of the remarks; in fact the level of venom in some instances is amazing.  I am white so it is not my racial ”oversensivity.” The outrage directed here at what is essentially a dress norm for young black men is way over the top. While I deplore the fact that young black men have chosen this degrading image, it is really nothing more than a style or fashion trend of the young. Apparently Deshon is guilty of overreacting to stern authoritarian measures. Who wouldn’t be outraged if airline officials challenged our right to board for what we considered arbitrary and unjust reasons, but with maturity we might handle the situation more effectively by quietly complying and saving our indignation for another venue (friend, spouse, blog, etc.). But Deshon is also guilty of being young and being black, and therein lies the difference.

  • tgroleau

    Why is this an appropriate news story for the Chronicle of Higher Ed?  It is because the young man happens to be a collegiate athlete?  Does the Chronicle report every college athlete who is arrested for anything?

  • http://larvatus.livejournal.com/ Michael Zeleny

    The fashion actually transitioned from prison culture, said author-youth advocate Judge Greg Mathis of the “Judge Mathis” show.    
    “In prison you aren’t allowed to wear belts to prevent self-hanging or the hanging of others,” said Mathis, who at 17 once served eight months in jail. “They take the belt and sometimes your pants hang down. The same with no shoestrings in your shoes. You aren’t allowed to have shoestrings. Many cultures of the prison have overflowed into the community unfortunately.”    
    Saggin’ also has sexual connotations in prison.    
    “Those who pulled their pants down the lowest and showed their behind a little more raw, that was an invitation,” said Mathis. “[The youth] don’t know this part about it. I always tease and tell them that they better be careful because some man who has been in prison 30 years who comes home and doesn’t know any different may think it’s an open invitation.”
    —Margena A. Christian, “The Facts Behind The Saggin’ Pants Craze”, Jet, Vol. 111, No. 18, 7 May 2007, pp 16

  • professormiller

    Honestly, it is not.  If every idiot at an airport had an article written about him/her, then you would have a journal devoted to silly behavior (there probably is one).  The Chronicle has a left-wing agenda.  It is as clear as the sky is blue.  They report this material because it projects a possible “victim” status within American society and it is neither proper nor objective.        Anyone can post.  Be wary of what you read.  Be skeptical of articles published.  In fact, it’s best to be logical and carry a healthy skepticism about any type of published material in the contemporary world.  If an argument is backed up with facts, even if you disagree with them, then that argument should be given respect. Argue on the facts.  Nothing more.  Nothing less.   There exists far too many posts here based almost solely upon emotion.  
      If you take a long look at the past 10 years of coverage in the Chronicle, then you see a clear left-wing ideology.  This is not objectivity.  I would hope, someday, there will exist a forum that is not so clearly slanted in one direction. You can see this bias by the articles chosen to be published.  You do not see conservative ideology here because it is considered evil or “bad.”  Everyone, for the sake of objectivity, should see both sides and let them choose which side they favor. 
      Yet, this is the world of academe.  Again, welcome to the liberals home-away-from home.  Their safe-haven.  The Ivory Tower.  And, many dare say there is no bias against conservatives in Academe.  Yet, they speak of freedom of thought and speech!  Only true if what is said agrees with their ideas. 
      It’s a typical liberal way of attempting to find wrongs where none exist any longer.  It is foolish!  And, the editors know it.
      If one is so confused as to not know how to pull their pants up in an airport, then they are no “victim.”  What his mother is supposedly quoted as saying is a typical answer for one that wants to be cast as a victim. 
      This man was no victim.  He is an adult that has free will and a choice and is not stupid.   Laws might be wrong but showing your arse is not a way of changing anything.  Always the victim….this, this…is what is wrong with this entire escapade.  There is no victim.  Tax dollars are lost on some idiot that is so disrespectful (or never taught) how to keep his pants on correctly?!  Welcome to the world of being “politically correct.”  It’s outmoded.  It’s stupid. There are no victims.   

  • 5768

    Not anything goes?  Since when?!

  • professormiller

    I agree that there is a lot of federal nonsense but it is for our collective safety.  I know it is irritating to go through extra checks and screenings at airports but it is for safety.  The government is not doing this as punishment.  It is to keep us safe. 
      Liberals always want the government to be more involved in our lives.  Well, they have it.  A good example.   As annoying as it is to go through all the screenings, it is not what you call “fascism.”  Study history. 
      American is not a fascist nation.  Can you define fascism without looking it up?  If not, then you have no idea what you’re talking about when using that word.  The federal government is not an enemy.  Rather, it is who we, as a people, elect that bow to foreign leaders and run up a debt far beyond anything manageable that does not deserve the office they hold.    Federalism is not the enemy.  It is those that are chosen to represent us that can either be a hero or a politician.  Nevertheless, you use “fascism” completely out of context. Not “every person” working at an airport is “the legislator, enforcer, and judge, all backed by the power of the federal government.”
      There exists annoying rules.  Yet, they exist for a reason. It is not “Fascism.”  It is safety.  Ask the Israelis.  I think they know a bit about airport security. 
     
     

  • mmcfadde

    Please correct this article.

    The young man was arrested for assaulting the gate and flight attendants.  He took issue with the airlines representative who found that because the man could not walk without holding up his pants that there was a safety issue involved with both entry and emergency exit policy. After being asked several times to pull up his pants, Mr. Marman decided to throw the gate attendant against a plate glass window, then, strolling down the jetway, cursed everyone in the area. Once on the plane he fought with the flight attendant as well as the safety and security personnel.

  • CU_Alum

    According to other reports I have seen, Mr. Marman was already on the plane when he was asked to leave and refused to do so.  That does constitute trespassing.  Given concerns about airline security, I can understand why the airline called the police.  But it does seem like both sides should have been able to prevent the situation from escalating to that point.

  • heliand

    I always thought university athletes had to wear suits when they travelled.
    Travel dress code notwithstanding, the young man was in public. Pull up your pants!

  • professormiller

    You make several good points.  I agree with almost everything you say.  Another example of liberal silliness:  Sen. Boxer of California.  She has actively advocated for gun control.  Yet, she owns them herself and has a firearms license. 
      Typical for a liberal.  Talk the talk but can’t live up to it.  It is just going to get worse as November 2012 gets closer.  Good thing is (I hope):  Checkmate for Obama! Libs are on the defensive.  They have a lot to answer for.  You’ll see few  people here that agree with anything hinting of conservatism.  Let your voice be heard.  Good post. 

  • geochaucer

    Betty, I think not.  He was not traveling as a member of a team or otherwise operating on behalf of the university.  He was going to a funeral.  He was no more representing the university than I do when travel to visit my kids or when I go to McDonald’s. 

  • geochaucer

    Wow, portiacoelhi, just wow.  Can you make up a scenario next involving a bicycle and a movie theater?

  • d_perez

    Thank you, WhizzKid!  I couldn’t agree more.  I find it incredibly offensive to be randomly and publically mooned by young guys who don’t have sense enough to pull their pants up.  Pants are supposed to cover your bum, and they’re not supposed to prevent you from walking normally, and they’re not supposed to make you look like an idiot.  I hate the baggy pants thing.  And dlws8607, I’m not fond of having my female students exposing their cleavage, either.  I would much prefer they show some self respect instead of trying to look like strippers. 

  • racmonti

    holy dog poo, professor! So we’ve gone from a story about a kid with bad manners and bad dress style to an attack on liberals? Who want the govt involved in our lives? What do you say about conservatives who want to decide some of the most important & personal choices regarding reproduction that face (mostly) women? When you conservatives want to poke under women’s and men’s undergarments (and I’m not talking about airport activities) and tell us what we may do/not do with them, now that’s getting way too personal!

  • racmonti

     Libs? Imagining Obama’s kids dressing like the guy in the story? Now what have these little girls ever done to you?

    Come on guys. This is a story about corporate employees and a customer who all acted like idiots. I’d say the conservatives are about as two-faced as anyone else.

     I have to wonder if Portia is a former neighbor of mine in DC? The name and the extreme sentiments expressed here remind me of her.

  • 11144703

    I see naked women covering their key parts on ads.  I guess on a plane that would be cool too.  And anyone against a cultural norm is a fascist.

    I’m hoping for the front underwear open trouser button half-opened fly look, showing only underwear.  Who’s being hurt?  Anyone against the cultural norm of a pants fly closed is a fascist. 

  • 11144703

    I’m hoping for the front-underwear open-trouser-button half-opened-fly look, showing only underwear.  Who’s being hurt?  Not even skin showing.  Anyone against the cultural norm of a closed pants fly is a fascist (and possible racist).  Those for the open front trouser button and open pants fly look SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Betty-Austin/557082992 Betty Austin

    Fashion and clothing is a language, a form of communication.  They sends signals to the observing eye and are strong manipulators that stir the imagination.  Modern society is declining in morality. Dressing slothfully in public is unacceptable and offensive. We as teachers must model and voice the importance of dressing tastefully, and the consequences thereof.

    Betty Austin

     

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Betty-Austin/557082992 Betty Austin

    That’s just it!  The young need to hear about and know what is not acceptable.  It is our duty to alert and pass along/teach and our youth how they look and sound.  There is a time and place for everything. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Betty-Austin/557082992 Betty Austin

    Adults should be mandated to show youth the right/ wrong, way of presenting themselves in public. We can’t continue to subscribe to the “I’m Ok you’re Ok” syndrome. Turn our heads, and say kids will be kids.  Morality in contemporary society is slipping away.  We must reclaim it for the sake of future generations.

    Betty 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Betty-Austin/557082992 Betty Austin

    Good point.  Dress codes across campuses today are becoming too relaxed and the gang mentality is creeping in causing crime, etc.  Media in this instance made the appropriate move
    by voicing the fact that an educated young adult is making poor dress choices in public.  This might help someone else from making the same mistake.

    Betty Austin

  • mkant69

    What is the evidence for this statement? If you look at the 10-Q and 10-K SEC filings of the publicly-traded for-profit colleges, the profits represent 10% to 20% of the student indebtedness. While significant, that’s hardly “much/most”, which imply “more than half”. 

  • rocky1969

    Stereotypes are problematic, in part, because they are based more on assumptions, beliefs, or prejudice rather than actual facts.  They may even be true in some cases, but when applied as across the board statements they are unfair, misleading, and in some cases entirely false.  Some for-profit colleges do take advantage of vulnerable and misled students and deserve harsh criticism and consequences.  But other for profit colleges are creating new paths for providing post secondary education that are effective, innovative, not encumbered by or beholding to funders, and deliver student outcomes that are consistent with the marketing/recruiting message.  Shareholders who have taken out second mortgages on their homes, skipped innumerable pay checks for themselves, and lost many nights sleep trying to make their vision a reality deserve a reasonable return on their investment of money, energy, and dedication. While it is often a bit tricky to define “reasonable return,” in the end, an institution with integrity resolves these issues and invests appropriately in the enrichment of the school, the educational programs, and the students’ experience, not just the shareholders’ bank accounts.  Integrity is not reserved for the world of not-for-profit institutions. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1533697656 Jeffrey G Ryan

    The problem with this piece is the suggestion of equivalency among two very different service providers, and the contention that this is only about paying for educational services for people without means – neither is accurate.   2-year colleges provide a range of services that for-profits don’t and generally can’t (easy transfers into 4-year school degree programs being the best example), as well as a menu of Associate-level technical degree programs, all at low cost per credit hour.   The vast majority of students in publicly funded community colleges are not on Federal financial aid, whereas the opposite is generally true in for-profits, and their business models, right down to their schedules of terms and courses, are designed to extract the legal maximum of Federal dollars from every student they enroll.   This last point is why there is such scrutiny of for-profits at present, while at the same time a Congress seeking to make major budget cuts is still looking for ways to increase support to 2-year colleges – they see the dollars spent/student degree ratios of each and vote the math. 

    What isn’t getting discussed is the critical parameter of what the best delivery is for different kinds of higher education degree programs.  What we certainly know is that no class of institution is a one-size-fits-all in this regard: there are clearly things the for-profits do better than traditional public/private colleges or 2-year colleges, as well as things only a bricks-and-mortar traditional institution can hope to deliver.   The broad brush approaches we’ve taken thus far prevent us examining these kinds of efficiencies and in fact encourages very expensive competition among higher ed providers not unlike what goes on with hospitals (and drives up healthcare costs thereby).  We need to change this and quickly if we’re to afford broad access to higher education in the near future.

  • nateccnn

    Coomunity college default rates = 4-5% while FP Default rates are closer to 15%.  Recall that 85% of the FP loans are paid in full…now do us the rerst of your math equation.  Public still makes more money as the subsidues at CC are much higher than the defaulted dollars at FP.