Plenty of institutions would like to churn out more software patents, but there doesn’t seem to be a real consensus on how to go about doing that. Should colleges separate technology projects from broader research-and-development programs or lump the two in together? Should professors run their own start-ups, or should seasoned entrepreneurs take over the reins? The answers are far from clear-cut.
That’s why a new working paper, titled “University Software Ownership: Technology Transfer or Business as Usual?,” might be of interest to any number of campus administrators. The paper — written by professors at Columbia University, Duke University, and the University of Texas at Austin, and published by the Social Science Research Network — hopes to act as a systematic study of campus software patenting.
The study argues that too many institutions have adopted a “one size fits all” approach to technology development. Software often follows a different route to commercial success than inventions in fields like life sciences, the authors write, so rigid approaches to research and development might result in a spate of weak IT patents. —Brock Read
Developing online and blended learning programs requires research and collaboration. Learn how top technology companies are partnering with campuses across the country to advance online learning as it becomes an increasingly important aspect of higher education.