“Within the confines of the lecture hall, no other virtue exists but plain intellectual integrity,” wrote Max Weber.
That may be so. But some of Weber’s intellectual grandchildren—i.e., the leaders of the American Sociological Association—believe that it also helps if instructors bring to their lecture halls a well-designed syllabus and a decent idea of how to engage students with the material.
To promote those smaller virtues, the association has just unveiled Trails, a digital repository where sociologists can post syllabi, lesson plans, bibliographies, and other teaching resources. The site already holds more than 2,700 items, and its doors are open for new submissions.
Not every submission will be automatically archived. Materials will be assessed by peer-review committees for their fidelity to a set of principles of high-quality teaching that have been identified by the association.
Committee members “are absolutely encouraged and empowered to turn down material,” says Margaret Weigers Vitullo, director of the association’s academic and professional-affairs program. But the process is not intended to be a roadblock, she says.
“Our goal for the peer-review process is not only to sort out which materials belong in the repository, but also to promote a conversation within the discipline about effective teaching and learning.”
Because items published on Trails will be peer-reviewed, Ms. Vitullo hopes that some faculty members will be able to include them in their tenure-and promotion portfolios. “I think Trails can set up a model for promoting the recognition of the scholarship of teaching and learning,” she argues. “As Ernest Boyer said, faculty reward systems will need to be revised in order for faculty members to truly be rewarded on the basis of their scholarship of teaching.”
An annual subscription to the Trails site costs $25 for association members, $100 for nonmembers.




7 Responses to A New Digital Repository for Sociology Instructors
dpn33 - May 26, 2010 at 4:10 pm
I can’t believe they charge for this. It should be free. It could still be peer-reviewed.
emmadw - May 26, 2010 at 5:06 pm
Would be useful to see how it compares to http://intute.ac.uk/sociology/ (a UK based [free] repository). However, as I’m not a member, can’t compare.
burkescottwilliams - May 26, 2010 at 5:43 pm
$25 is hardly an unreasonable amount of money to charge for the upkeep of a site, the code, and servers, since, presumably, one can access in through one’s institution. While such things are much, much cheaper than a traditional journal, they are not actually free. Now, one could argue that it should be paid out of the professional society dues, which would be a reasonable alternate model.
rmelton5 - May 26, 2010 at 8:12 pm
How are they making it available to libraries?
sanjoaquin - May 27, 2010 at 9:33 am
It would be highly unusual for the ASA to do something free to its members or anyone else, in my experience. The pricing structure is inverse to the needs of the potential audience for these materials. Anyone wants to organize a repository with free access as a public service to the discipline, its practitioners, and its students, I’m in.
dpn33 - May 28, 2010 at 10:40 am
There are numerous other free repositories out there. Yes, of coruse, there are costs to the host, but there should be a way for the general user to access it without paying $100. If scholars want their work to be read, this isn’t the way to go.
cepp3168 - May 31, 2010 at 12:27 am
Amanda and Darlaine:In case you were not aware of this. cindy