• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

UCLA Defies Call to Ban Muslim Students Association

March 2, 2011, 3:06 pm

Officials at the University of California at Los Angeles have rejected a prominent advocacy group’s demands that they remove a Muslim Students Association chapter from the campus.  ACT for America, a group founded to combat what it regards as Islamic radicalism, has gathered more than 900 signatures on a petition urging UCLA to ban the association “on the grounds that their purpose is to conduct a stealth jihad against America through the indoctrination of our youth on college campuses.” In leveling such accusations, ACT for America has cited remarks made in January at a Muslim conference at the university—remarks that Phil Hampton, a UCLA spokesman, says the group has mischaracterized. Mr. Hampton says the Muslim group has done nothing that justifies banning it. David Horowitz, a conservative who often criticizes radical Islam, has issued a statement calling the ACT for America campaign misguided because it would curtail the Muslim Students Association’s First Amendment rights.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • traneman

    I checked out ACT for America’s website and I immediately thought that I could be looking at the website of a neo-nazi or white supremicist group. It still boggles my mind, and somewhat frightens me, that supposedly intelligent people can create such hysteria and get others to believe and support them! Such people never let the facts or common sense get in the way of what they want to believe. I guess, like the talking heads on Fox, they create this unfounded hysteria because it sells and gets them attention. According to them, anyone who has an Arabic sounding name, or looks to be from the “Middle East” (There is no “Middle East” unless you want to add all of N. Africa, Greece, and part of the former Soviet Union), must be some Islamic radical. This narrow-mindedness serves no one but their ridiculous cause. These people have absolutely no real understanding of what it is to be true to our Constitution.

  • old nassau’67

    A couple observations:
    1. UCLA has 40,000 students, about 20,000 support (faculty, staff, maintenance, security….): 900 isn’t much.
    2. and even if more signed, MSA has done nothing
    3. and even if the “remarks” were correctly characterized, they are speech, not actions,
    4. and, on this day, as decided 8 – 1 by the US Supreme Court, the First Amendment protects the far more “hateful”, but still just “speech” of the Westboro Baptist Church.

  • keis8427

    dank48…you rocked that answer!

  • mindnbodybuilding

    yeah he did!

  • gratefulamerican

    This is not a free speech issue. It is a sedition issue. Seditious behavior should not be tolerated by those of us who love our liberty and regard the Constitution as the law of the land.

  • gratefulamerican

    Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with Sharia. It is a totalitarian legal doctrine in direct contrast with liberty. Kudos to ACT for attempting to expose the threat we face from Islamic doctrines being promoted on American campuses.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRNCYRBBEu8