• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

U. of Wisconsin-Green Bay Faculty Votes to Unionize

May 13, 2011, 2:51 pm

Faculty members at the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay have voted overwhelmingly in favor of union representation, according to the American Federation of Teachers. Of the 167 full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty members who would be represented by the new AFT-affiliated union, 117 voted in favor of forming it and just 2 voted against. The campus is the seventh in the University of Wisconsin system whose faculty members have voted in favor of unionizing since the state’s adoption of a 2009 measure giving the system’s faculty and academic staff the right to bargain collectively. Five of those successful votes have been held in the months since Gov. Scott Walker proposed a measure—subsequently adopted by lawmakers but held up in the courts—that would strip academic faculty and staff members of their right to bargain collectively. The AFT statement announcing the Green Bay results taunts the state’s Republican governor, saying he “deserves at least a fruitbasket for all of the work he’s done in helping organize the University of Wisconsin system.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • akprof

    Oh, Scott Walker so deserves this!! 

  • jffoster

    If the Wisconsin Law stands, it’ll be a union with no teeth and a fat lot of good it’ll do em.  

  • badgerblogger

    It’s Gov. Walker (a C-average college student who chose to leave Marquette University after he lost a student election to a write-in candidate under “suspicious” circumstances) who should be pitied, not the move of a growing number of UW System faculties to unionize. Walker’s “successes” so far: his pandering to out-of-state Tea Party ideologues rather than working for the citizens of WI who don’t support his extreme political beliefs;  obvious and heavy-handed power grabs at meetings that most likely violate state open meeting requirements; and myopic policies that have — literally — cost WI millions of dollars and have resulted in a strong (and, most likely, successful) recall effort aimed at Walker and toady state GOP senators. Walker’s moves to “bust” all public unions has only resulted in previous supporters recoiling from him during his first 5 months in office and in protests reminiscent of the 1960s civil rights marches. 

    Walker was FORCED to admit, under Congressional oath, that the move to kill off public unions in WI would not save ANY tax money. But that was the reason he proposed the move in a state budget repair bill that is currently tied up in state litigation. Walker’s move to split off the University of Wisconsin-Madison from the rest of the UW System (to offer the flagship school more “flexibility”) has resulted in growing support for the System as a strong and cohesive 26-campus entity and a growing level of distrust for “freshman” UW Chancellor Biddy Martin from her campus and from UW System chancellors.  (While 2 former UW chancellors have now indicated their support a split, they certainly didn’t get behind this move when THEY were in charge at Madison!) 

    Walker and his supporters are skilled liars (grossly exagerating costs, solving “problems” where none exist, setting up straw-man arguments that can’t withstand minimal fact-checking). But when the truth eventually comes out, things have a way of falling apart for him.

    UW System faculty who’ve voted to unionize will be in the BEST position to fight Walker, a political lightweight who, ideally, will be drummed out of office in 2012. Congratulations to UW-Green Bay faculty for standing up for THEIR rights and the rights of all UW System faculty and staff.

  • jffoster

    “for standing up for ‘their’ rights”?   They have a right to form and join a union. Public employees do not have a right to collective bargaining. They may have the privilege provided the laws of the particular State grant it to them or require it be done with them.  

  • jwr12

    I find this notion that collective bargaining is a “privilege” somewhat contrary to common sense, regardless of what the law says.  Why should the voluntary decision of a group of workers to bargain together be regarded as a “privilege”?  What it is is a natural assertion by laborers of their collective power, that in turn is legally regulated and outlawed under certain circumstances by our particular political institutions.  Calling it a privilege seems to imply that it takes a special dispensation of the public to make such collective action possible, whereas in point of fact our public institutions have chosen — for a variety of reasons, only some plausibly defensible — to forcibly limit labor action.  If living is a right, and labor an obligation, then it would seem to me that seeking just terms for one’s labor is merely a matter of survival, and as such is as natural a right as exists.

  • jffoster

    Even FDR and George Meany had real difficulties with the notion of collective bargaining with government. Government may choose, whether a good idea or not, to bargain collectively with a union. But it doesn’t have to.  

  • EmmaMmm

    Not true.  Even if the law eventually goes into effect, the union can and will bargain for what it can, which will include work conditions, class sizes, etc.  A union with a nearly unanimous vote + an administration that is afraid that their faculty will bolt due to the Wisconsin GOP’s hostility to higher ed = an environment where bargaining will be possible.

  • paldy

    Pray for backlash!   This gives me hope.

  • uwstaff

    If the law is implemented as passed, UW faculty and staff will be barred from collective bargaining again.  The newly formed union can attempt to advocate for its members, but it will have no place at the table with campus or state administrators.  We’ve already had that kind of union for many years, and it isn’t effective. 

  • jffoster

    Bolt whither?  To Ohio?   

  • EmmaMmm

    To private schools.  Or to the private sector, where we’ll be competing with you for your job.  Watch out.  We’re smart, resourceful and have already been taught to do more with less.

  • EmmaMmm

     Only true on the state level. Local administration ignores the overwhelming majority of their faculty at their peril.